Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multiplexed Proteome Dynamics Profiling Reveals Mechanisms Controlling Protein Homeostasis

Open access
Savitski, Mikhail M., Zinn, Nico, Faelth-Savitski, Maria, Poeckel, Daniel, Gade, Stephan, Becher, Isabelle, Muelbaier, Marcel, Wagner, Anne J., Strohmer, Katrin, Werner, Thilo, Melchert, Stephanie, Petretich, Massimo, Rutkowska, Anna, Vappiani, Johanna, Franken, Holger, Steidel, Michael, Sweetman, Gavain M., Gilan, Omer, Lam, Enid Y.N., Dawson, Mark A., Prinjha, Rab K., Grandi, Paola, Bergamini, Giovanna, Bantscheff, Marcus·2018·Cell

Abstract

Protein degradation plays important roles in biological processes and is tightly regulated. Further, targeted proteolysis is an emerging research tool and therapeutic strategy. However, proteome-wide technologies to investigate the causes and consequences of protein degradation in biological systems are lacking. We developed "multiplexed proteome dynamics profiling" (mPDP), a mass-spectrometry-based approach combining dynamic-SILAC labeling with isobaric mass tagging for multiplexed analysis of protein degradation and synthesis. In three proof-of-concept studies, we uncover different responses induced by the bromodomain inhibitor JQ1 versus a JQ1 proteolysis targeting chimera; we elucidate distinct modes of action of estrogen receptor modulators; and we comprehensively classify HSP90 clients based on their requirement for HSP90 constitutively or during synthesis, demonstrating that constitutive HSP90 clients have lower thermal stability than non-clients, have higher affinity for the chaperone, vary between cell types, and change upon external stimuli. These findings highlight the potential of mPDP to identify dynamically controlled degradation mechanisms in cellular systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.030

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 218

Metadata

Authors
Savitski, M. M., Zinn, N., Faelth-Savitski, M., Poeckel, D., Gade, S., Becher, I., Muelbaier, M., Wagner, A. J., Strohmer, K., Werner, T., Melchert, S., Petretich, M., Rutkowska, A., Vappiani, J., Franken, H., Steidel, M., Sweetman, G. M., Gilan, O., Lam, E. Y. N., Dawson, M. A., Prinjha, R. K., Grandi, P., Bergamini, G., & Bantscheff, M.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
173
Issue
1
Pages
260-274.e25
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791501381
Cited by
218
References
24
FWCI
12.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiplexed Proteome Dynamics Profiling Reveals Mechanisms Controlling Protein Homeostasis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.030
The paper
Savitski, M. M., Zinn, N., Faelth-Savitski, M., Poeckel, D., Gade, S., Becher, I., Muelbaier, M., Wagner, A. J., Strohmer, K., Werner, T., Melchert, S., Petretich, M., Rutkowska, A., Vappiani, J., Franken, H., Steidel, M., Sweetman, G. M., Gilan, O., Lam, E. Y. N., . . . Bantscheff, M. (2018). Multiplexed Proteome Dynamics Profiling Reveals Mechanisms Controlling Protein Homeostasis. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.030

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.