Cited by 231T-cell and B-cell ImmunologyAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesIL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

TCR Transgenic Mice Reveal Stepwise, Multi-site Acquisition of the Distinctive Fat-Treg Phenotype

Open access

Abstract

Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) hosts a population of regulatory T (Treg) cells, with a unique phenotype, that controls local and systemic inflammation and metabolism. Generation of a T cell receptor transgenic mouse line, wherein VAT Tregs are highly enriched, facilitated study of their provenance, dependencies, and activities. We definitively established a role for T cell receptor specificity, uncovered an unexpected function for the primordial Treg transcription-factor, Foxp3, evidenced a cell-intrinsic role for interleukin-33 receptor, and ordered these dependencies within a coherent scenario. Genesis of the VAT-Treg phenotype entailed a priming step in the spleen, permitting them to exit the lymphoid organs and surveil nonlymphoid tissues, and a final diversification process within VAT, in response to microenvironmental cues. Understanding the principles of tissue-Treg biology is a prerequisite for precision-targeting strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.004

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 33 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–230 of 230

Metadata

Authors
Li, C., DiSpirito, J. R., Zemmour, D., Spallanzani, R. G., Kuswanto, W., Benoist, C., & Mathis, D.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Mathis, Diane
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
174
Issue
2
Pages
285-299.e12
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2806425229
Cited by
231
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 8
FWCI
10.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • American Diabetes Association (1-16-PDF-028, 1-17-PMF-005)
  • National Institutes of Health (2R01 DK092541)
  • JPB Foundation
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (F30AG046045, T32-GM007753)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › IL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways
Keywords
visceral adipose tissue, regulatory T cells, T cell receptor transgenic mice, Foxp3, Treg differentiation, microenvironmental cues
MeSH terms
Interleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 Protein, Animals, Macrophages, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Phenotype, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, RNA, Spleen, Receptors, Interleukin, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly, PPAR gamma, Intra-Abdominal Fat, T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory, Mice, Forkhead Transcription Factors, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review