Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quiescent cancer cells resist T cell attack by forming an immunosuppressive niche

Open access
Baldominos, Pilar, Barbera-Mourelle, Alex, Barreiro, Olga, Huang, Yu, Wight, Andrew, Cho, Jae-Won, Zhao, Xi, Estivill, Guillem, Adam, Isam, Sanchez, Xavier, McCarthy, Shannon, Schaller, Julien, Khan, Zara, Ruzo, Albert, Pastorello, Ricardo, Richardson, Edward T., Dillon, Deborah, Montero-Llopis, Paula, Barroso-Sousa, Romualdo, Forman, Juliet, Shukla, Sachet A., Tolaney, Sara M., Mittendorf, Elizabeth A., von Andrian, Ulrich H., Wucherpfennig, Kai W., Hemberg, Martin, Agudo, Judith·2022·Cell

Abstract

SUMMARY Immunotherapy is a promising treatment for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but patients relapse, highlighting the need to understand the mechanisms of resistance. We discovered that in primary breast cancer, tumor cells that resist T cell attack are quiescent. Quiescent cancer cells (QCCs) form clusters with reduced immune infiltration. They also display superior tumorigenic capacity and higher expression of chemotherapy resistance and stemness genes. We adapted single-cell RNA-sequencing with precise spatial resolution to profile infiltrating cells inside and outside the QCC niche. This transcriptomic analysis revealed hypoxia-induced programs and identified more exhausted T cells, tumor-protective fibroblasts, and dysfunctional dendritic cells inside clusters of QCCs. This uncovered differential phenotypes in infiltrating cells based on their intra-tumor location. Thus, QCCs constitute immunotherapy-resistant reservoirs by orchestrating a local hypoxic immune-suppressive milieu that blocks T cell function. Eliminating QCCs holds the promise to counteract immunotherapy resistance and prevent disease recurrence in TNBC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2022.03.033

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 107 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Baldominos, P., Barbera-Mourelle, A., Barreiro, O., Huang, Y., Wight, A., Cho, J.-W., Zhao, X., Estivill, G., Adam, I., Sanchez, X., McCarthy, S., Schaller, J., Khan, Z., Ruzo, A., Pastorello, R., Richardson, E. T., Dillon, D., Montero-Llopis, P., Barroso-Sousa, R., Forman, J., Shukla, S. A., Tolaney, S. M., Mittendorf, E. A., von Andrian, U. H., Wucherpfennig, K. W., Hemberg, M., & Agudo, J.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
185
Issue
10
Pages
1694-1708.e19
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4226021421
Cited by
317
References
107
FWCI
24.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quiescent cancer cells resist T cell attack by forming an immunosuppressive niche. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cell.2022.03.033
The paper
Baldominos, P., Barbera-Mourelle, A., Barreiro, O., Huang, Y., Wight, A., Cho, J.-W., Zhao, X., Estivill, G., Adam, I., Sanchez, X., McCarthy, S., Schaller, J., Khan, Z., Ruzo, A., Pastorello, R., Richardson, E. T., Dillon, D., Montero-Llopis, P., Barroso-Sousa, R., . . . Agudo, J. (2022). Quiescent cancer cells resist T cell attack by forming an immunosuppressive niche. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.03.033

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.