Cited by 12DNA Repair MechanismsBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Mechanism of DNA capture by the MukBEF SMC complex and its inhibition by a viral DNA mimic

Open access
Bürmann, Frank, Clifton, Bryony, Koekemoer, Sophie, Wilkinson, Oliver J., Kimanius, Dari, Dillingham, Mark S., Löwe, Jan·2025·Cell

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Ring-like structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) complexes are crucial for genome organization and operate through mechanisms of DNA entrapment and loop extrusion. Here, we explore the DNA loading process of the bacterial SMC complex MukBEF. Using cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM), we demonstrate that ATP binding opens one of MukBEF's three potential DNA entry gates, exposing a DNA capture site that positions DNA at the open neck gate. We discover that the gp5.9 protein of bacteriophage T7 blocks this capture site by DNA mimicry, thereby preventing DNA loading and inactivating MukBEF. We propose a comprehensive and unidirectional loading mechanism in which DNA is first captured at the complex's periphery and then ingested through the DNA entry gate, powered by a single cycle of ATP hydrolysis. These findings illuminate a fundamental aspect of how ubiquitous DNA organizers are primed for genome maintenance and demonstrate how this process can be disrupted by viruses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2025.02.032

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Bürmann, F., Clifton, B., Koekemoer, S., Wilkinson, O. J., Kimanius, D., Dillingham, M. S., & Löwe, J.
Affiliations
  • MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Bürmann, Frank
  • Dillingham, Mark S.
  • Löwe, Jan
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-05
Volume
188
Issue
9
Pages
2465-2479.e14
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4409108849
Cited by
12
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (227260/Z/23/Z)
  • UK Research and Innovation Medical Research Council
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/Y004426/1)
  • European Molecular Biology Organization
  • UK Research and Innovation
  • EMBO (ALTF 605-2019)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
MukBEF, SMC complex, DNA loading, DNA capture, ATP hydrolysis, bacteriophage T7, DNA loop extrusion, genome organization, bacterial chromosome organization
MeSH terms
Adenosine Triphosphate, Bacterial Proteins, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, DNA, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Viral, Escherichia coli, Viral Proteins, Bacteriophage T7, Cryoelectron Microscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review