Cited by 3Cellular transport and secretionExtracellular vesicles in diseaseMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Continuum architecture dynamics of vesicle tethering in exocytosis

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Essential for eukaryotes, multiple copies of the exocyst complex tether each secretory vesicle to the plasma membrane (PM) in constitutive exocytosis. The exocyst higher-order structure (ExHOS) that coordinates the action of these multiple exocysts remains unexplored. We integrated particle tracking, super-resolution microscopy, and cryo-electron tomography to time-resolve the continuum conformational landscape of the ExHOS and to functionally annotate its different conformations. We found that 7 exocysts form a flexible ring-shaped ExHOS that tethers vesicles at <45 nm from the PM. The ExHOS rapidly expands while pulling the vesicle toward the PM in a stepwise mechanism comprising three metastable states at 27, 18, and 5 nm from the PM. After fusion, Sec18 mediates the disassembly of the stationary ExHOS, a function that controls the rate of exocytosis. By resolving biophysical principles in situ, we reconstructed the spatiotemporal dynamics of the multimeric architecture controlling vesicle tethering in exocytosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2025.11.038

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 89

  1. He, 2009, The exocyst complex in polarized exocytosis, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 21, 537, 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.04.007 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Munson, 2006, The exocyst defrocked, a framework of rods revealed, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 13, 577, 10.1038/nsmb1097 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Rossi, 2020, Exocyst structural changes associated with activation of tethering downstream of Rho/Cdc42 GTPases, J. Cell Biol., 219, 10.1083/jcb.201904161 · DOI
  4. Liu, 2023, A phosphoinositide switch mediates exocyst recruitment to multivesicular endosomes for exosome secretion, Nat. Commun., 14
  5. Ma, 2024, Exo70 promotes herpesvirus secretory vesicle tethering and virion release in an exocyst complex-dependent manner, bioRxiv
  6. Miao, 2017, Collaboration between Distinct Rab Small GTPase Trafficking Circuits Mediates Bacterial Clearance from the Bladder Epithelium, Cell Host Microbe, 22, 330, 10.1016/j.chom.2017.08.002 · DOI
  7. Nichols, 2010, Salmonella-directed recruitment of new membrane to invasion foci via the host exocyst complex, Curr. Biol., 20, 1316, 10.1016/j.cub.2010.05.065 · DOI
  8. Zhu, 2024, Salmonella exploits membrane reservoirs for invasion of host cells, Nat. Commun., 15
  9. Fujisaki, 2015, Rice Exo70 interacts with a fungal effector, AVR-Pii, and is required for AVR-Pii-triggered immunity, Plant J., 83, 875, 10.1111/tpj.12934 · DOI
  10. Michalopoulou, 2022, The host exocyst complex is targeted by a conserved bacterial type-III effector that promotes virulence, Plant Cell, 34, 3400, 10.1093/plcell/koac162 · DOI
  11. Guo, 1999, The exocyst is an effector for Sec4p, targeting secretory vesicles to sites of exocytosis, EMBO J., 18, 1071, 10.1093/emboj/18.4.1071 · DOI
  12. Novick, 2016, Regulation of membrane traffic by Rab GEF and GAP cascades, Small GTPases, 7, 252, 10.1080/21541248.2016.1213781 · DOI
  13. Sivaram, 2005, Dimerization of the exocyst protein Sec6p and its interaction with the t-SNARE Sec9p, Biochemistry, 44, 6302, 10.1021/bi048008z · DOI
  14. Grote, 2000, Ordering the Final Events in Yeast Exocytosis, J. Cell Biol., 151, 439, 10.1083/jcb.151.2.439 · DOI
  15. Söllner, 1993, A Protein Assembly-Disassembly Pathway In Vitro That May Correspond to Sequential Steps of Synaptic Vesicle Docking, Activation, and Fusion, Cell, 75, 409, 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90376-2 · DOI
  16. Heider, 2016, Subunit connectivity, assembly determinants and architecture of the yeast exocyst complex, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 23, 59, 10.1038/nsmb.3146 · DOI
  17. Mei, 2018, Cryo-EM structure of the exocyst complex, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 25, 139, 10.1038/s41594-017-0016-2 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Ganesan, 2020, Integrative structure and function of the yeast exocyst complex, Protein Sci., 29, 1486, 10.1002/pro.3863 · DOI
  19. Ahmed, 2018, Exocyst dynamics during vesicle tethering and fusion, Nat. Commun., 9, 10.1038/s41467-018-07467-5 · DOI
  20. Picco, 2017, The In Vivo Architecture of the Exocyst Provides Structural Basis for Exocytosis, Cell, 168, 400, 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.004 · DOI
  21. Gingras, 2022, High-resolution secretory timeline from vesicle formation at the Golgi to fusion at the plasma membrane in S. cerevisiae, eLife, 11, 10.7554/eLife.78750 · DOI
  22. Marko, 2007, Focused-ion-beam thinning of frozen-hydrated biological specimens for cryo-electron microscopy, Nat. Methods, 4, 215, 10.1038/nmeth1014 · DOI
  23. Lučić, 2013, Cryo-electron tomography: The challenge of doing structural biology in situ, J. Cell Biol., 202, 407, 10.1083/jcb.201304193 · DOI
  24. Picco, 2015, Visualizing the functional architecture of the endocytic machinery, eLife, 4, 10.7554/eLife.04535 · DOI
  25. Cieslinski, 2023, Nanoscale structural organization and stoichiometry of the budding yeast kinetochore, J. Cell Biol., 222, 10.1083/jcb.202209094 · DOI
  26. Betzig, 2006, Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution, Science, 313, 1642, 10.1126/science.1127344 · DOI
  27. Zanacchi, 2017, A DNA origami platform for quantifying protein copy number in super-resolution, Nat. Methods, 14, 789, 10.1038/nmeth.4342 · DOI
  28. Thevathasan, 2019, Nuclear pores as versatile reference standards for quantitative superresolution microscopy, Nat. Methods, 16, 1045, 10.1038/s41592-019-0574-9 · DOI
  29. Orr, 2022, Sec18 supports membrane fusion by promoting Sec17 membrane association, Mol. Biol. Cell, 33, 10.1091/mbc.E22-07-0274 · DOI
  30. White, 2018, Structural principles of SNARE complex recognition by the AAA+ protein NSF, eLife, 7, 10.7554/eLife.38888 · DOI
  31. Zhao, 2015, Mechanistic insights into the recycling machine of the SNARE complex, Nature, 518, 61, 10.1038/nature14148 · DOI
  32. Haruki, 2008, The Anchor-Away Technique: Rapid, Conditional Establishment of Yeast Mutant Phenotypes, Mol. Cell, 31, 925, 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.07.020 · DOI
  33. Gallego, 2013, Detection and Characterization of Protein Interactions In Vivo by a Simple Live-Cell Imaging Method, PLoS One, 8, 10.1371/journal.pone.0062195 · DOI
  34. Rinner, 2008, Identification of cross-linked peptides from large sequence databases, Nat. Methods, 5, 315, 10.1038/nmeth.1192 · DOI
  35. Mayer, 1996, Sec18p (NSF)-Driven Release of Sec17p (alpha-SNAP) Can Precede Docking and Fusion of Yeast Vacuoles, Cell, 85, 83, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81084-3 · DOI
  36. Lee, 2024, Exocyst stimulates multiple steps of exocytic SNARE complex assembly and vesicle fusion, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 32, 150, 10.1038/s41594-024-01388-2 · DOI
  37. An, 2021, An active tethering mechanism controls the fate of vesicles, Nat. Commun., 12, 10.1038/s41467-021-25465-y · DOI
  38. He, 2007, Exo70 interacts with phospholipids and mediates the targeting of the exocyst to the plasma membrane, EMBO J., 26, 4053, 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601834 · DOI
  39. Kustermann, 2017, The cell polarity proteins Boi1p and Boi2p stimulate vesicle fusion at the plasma membrane of yeast cells, J. Cell Sci., 130, 2996, 10.1242/jcs.206334 · DOI
  40. Masgrau, 2017, Distinct roles of the polarity factors Boi1 and Boi2 in the control of exocytosis and abscission in budding yeast, Mol. Biol. Cell, 28, 3082, 10.1091/mbc.e17-06-0404 · DOI
  41. Miller, 2023, Allosteric regulation of exocyst: Discrete activation of tethering by two spatial signals, J. Cell Biol., 222, 10.1083/jcb.202206108 · DOI
  42. Wu, 2010, The Exo70 subunit of the exocyst is an effector for both Cdc42 and Rho3 function in polarized exocytosis, Mol. Biol. Cell, 21, 430, 10.1091/mbc.e09-06-0501 · DOI
  43. Zhang, 2008, Membrane association and functional regulation of Sec3 by phospholipids and Cdc42, J. Cell Biol., 180, 145, 10.1083/jcb.200704128 · DOI
  44. Morgera, 2012, Regulation of exocytosis by the exocyst subunit Sec6 and the SM protein Sec1, Mol. Biol. Cell, 23, 337, 10.1091/mbc.e11-08-0670 · DOI
  45. Bera, 2023, Two successive oligomeric Munc13 assemblies scaffold vesicle docking and SNARE assembly to support neurotransmitter release, bioRxiv
  46. Rothman, 2023, Turbocharging synaptic transmission, FEBS Lett., 597, 2233, 10.1002/1873-3468.14718 · DOI
  47. Zhang, 1998, Synaptic vesicle size and number are regulated by a clathrin adaptor protein required for endocytosis, Neuron, 21, 1465, 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80664-9 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Maib, 2022, A mechanism for exocyst-mediated tethering via Arf6 and PIP5K1C-driven phosphoinositide conversion, Curr. Biol., 32, 2821, 10.1016/j.cub.2022.04.089 · DOI
  49. Janke, 2004, A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes, Yeast, 21, 947, 10.1002/yea.1142 · DOI
  50. Khmelinskii, 2011, Seamless gene tagging by endonuclease-driven homologous recombination, PLoS One, 6, 10.1371/journal.pone.0023794 · DOI
  51. Thévenaz, 1998, A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 7, 27, 10.1109/83.650848 · DOI
  52. Schindelin, 2012, Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis, Nat. Methods, 9, 676, 10.1038/nmeth.2019 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Mastronarde, 2005, Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements, J. Struct. Biol., 152, 36, 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.07.007 · DOI
  54. Kremer, 1996, Computer Visualization of Three-Dimensional Image Data Using IMOD, J. Struct. Biol., 116, 71, 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0013 · DOI
  55. Paul-Gilloteaux, 2017, EC-CLEM: Flexible multidimensional registration software for correlative microscopies, Nat. Methods, 14, 102, 10.1038/nmeth.4170 · DOI
  56. Eisenstein, 2023, Parallel cryo electron tomography on in situ lamellae, Nat. Methods, 20, 131, 10.1038/s41592-022-01690-1 · DOI
  57. Scheres, 2012, RELION: Implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination, J. Struct. Biol., 180, 519, 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.09.006 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Zheng, 2022, AreTomo: An integrated software package for automated marker-free, motion-corrected cryo-electron tomographic alignment and reconstruction, J. Struct. Biol. X, 6
  59. Mastronarde, 2017, Automated tilt series alignment and tomographic reconstruction in IMOD, J. Struct. Biol., 197, 102, 10.1016/j.jsb.2016.07.011 · DOI
  60. Castaño-Díez, 2012, Dynamo: A flexible, user-friendly development tool for subtomogram averaging of cryo-EM data in high-performance computing environments, J. Struct. Biol., 178, 139, 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.12.017 · DOI
  61. Iudin, 2023, EMPIAR: the Electron Microscopy Public Image Archive, Nucleic Acids Res., 51, D1503, 10.1093/nar/gkac1062 · DOI
  62. Lamm, 2024, MemBrain v2: an end-to-end tool for the analysis of membranes in cryo-electron tomography, bioRxiv
  63. Edelsbrunner, 1994, Three-dimensional alpha shapes, ACM Trans. Graph., 13, 43, 10.1145/174462.156635 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Coray, 2025, Geometry-aware template matching for cryo-electron tomograms in Dynamo, Structure, 33, 1591, 10.1016/j.str.2025.06.009 · DOI
  65. Turner, 2024, EMDB—the Electron Microscopy Data Bank, Nucleic Acids Res., 52, D456, 10.1093/nar/gkad1019 · DOI
  66. Edelstein, 2014, Advanced methods of microscope control using μManager software, J. Biol. Methods, 1, 10.14440/jbm.2014.36 · DOI
  67. Tinevez, 2017, TrackMate: An open and extensible platform for single-particle tracking, Methods, 115, 80, 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.09.016 · DOI
  68. Miura, 2020, Bleach correction ImageJ plugin for compensating the photobleaching of time-lapse sequences, F1000Res, 9, 10.12688/f1000research.27171.1 · DOI
  69. Moreira, 2009, Pil1 Controls Eisosome Biogenesis, Mol. Biol. Cell, 20, 809, 10.1091/mbc.e08-03-0313 · DOI
  70. Chen, 1995, Identification of an 11-kDa FKBP12-rapamycin-binding domain within the 289-kDa FKBP12-rapamycin-associated protein and characterization of a critical serine residue, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 4947, 10.1073/pnas.92.11.4947 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Pazos, 2023, The P4-ATPase Drs2 interacts with and stabilizes the multisubunit tethering complex TRAPPIII in yeast, EMBO Rep., 24, 10.15252/embr.202256134 · DOI
  72. Guo, 2020, Sphingolipids are required for exocyst polarity and exocytic secretion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Cell Biosci., 10, 10.1186/s13578-020-00406-2 · DOI
  73. Chiva, 2018, QCloud: A cloud-based quality control system for mass spectrometry-based proteomics laboratories, PLoS One, 13, 10.1371/journal.pone.0189209 · DOI
  74. Perkins, 1999, Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data, Electrophoresis, 20, 3551, 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19991201)20:18<3551::AID-ELPS3551>3.0.CO;2-2 · DOI
  75. Beer, 2017, Efficient quantitative comparisons of plasma proteomes using label-free analysis with MaxQuant, Methods Mol. Biol., 1619, 339, 10.1007/978-1-4939-7057-5_23 · DOI
  76. Perez-Riverol, 2022, The PRIDE database resources in 2022: A hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences, Nucleic Acids Res., 50, D543, 10.1093/nar/gkab1038 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Mund, 2018, Systematic Nanoscale Analysis of Endocytosis Links Efficient Vesicle Formation to Patterned Actin Nucleation, Cell, 174, 884, 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.032 · DOI
  78. Deschamps, 2016, Efficient homogeneous illumination and optical sectioning for quantitative single-molecule localization microscopy, Opt. Express, 24, 28080, 10.1364/OE.24.028080 · DOI
  79. Deschamps, 2020, EMU: reconfigurable graphical user interfaces for Micro-Manager, BMC Bioinform., 21, 10.1186/s12859-020-03727-8 · DOI
  80. Ries, 2020, SMAP: a modular super-resolution microscopy analysis platform for SMLM data, Nat. Methods, 17, 870, 10.1038/s41592-020-0938-1 · DOI
  81. Burley, 2017, Protein Data Bank (PDB): The Single Global Macromolecular Structure Archive, Methods Mol. Biol., 1607, 627, 10.1007/978-1-4939-7000-1_26 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Taubin, 1991, Estimation of Planar Curves, Surfaces, and Nonplanar Space Curves Defined by Implicit Equations with Applications to Edge and Range Image Segmentation, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 13, 1115, 10.1109/34.103273 · DOI
  83. Chernov, 2004, Statistical efficiency of curve fitting algorithms, Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 47, 713, 10.1016/j.csda.2003.11.008 · DOI
  84. Pedregosa, 2011, Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12, 2825
  85. Bateman, 2025, UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2025, Nucl. Acids Res., 53, D609, 10.1093/nar/gkae1010 · DOI · Paper page
  86. Rizo, 2024, Molecular mechanism underlying SNARE-mediated membrane fusion enlightened by all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 121, 10.1073/pnas.2321447121 · DOI
  87. Madeira, 2024, The EMBL-EBI Job Dispatcher sequence analysis tools framework in 2024, Nucleic Acids Res., 52, W521, 10.1093/nar/gkae241 · DOI
  88. Šali, 1993, Comparative Protein Modelling by Satisfaction of Spatial Restraints, J. Mol. Biol., 234, 779, 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626 · DOI · Paper page
  89. Meng, 2023, UCSF ChimeraX: Tools for structure building and analysis, Protein Sci., 32, 10.1002/pro.4792 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Puig-Tintó, M., Ortiz, S., Meek, S., Coray, R., Betancur, L. I., Hernández, A. C., Castellet, A., Kramer, E., Hoess, P., Mund, M., Molina-Ribagorda, A., Izquierdo-Serra, M., Oliva, B., de Marco, A., Ries, J., Castaño-Díez, D., Manzo, C., & Gallego, O.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
  • University of the Basque Country (ES)
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
  • New York Structural Biology Center (US)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • Universitat de Vic - Universitat Central de Catalunya (ES)
Corresponding author
  • Ries, Jonas
  • Manzo, Carlo
  • Gallego, Oriol
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-02
Volume
189
Issue
4
Pages
1170-1184.e22
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7124435907
Cited by
3
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • State Agency of Research
  • Human Frontier Science Program
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
Keywords
exocyst complex, vesicle tethering, exocytosis, Sec18, vesicle fusion, plasma membrane, metastable states, secretory vesicles, conformational dynamics, particle tracking, cryo-electron tomography
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Membrane, Exocytosis, Membrane Fusion, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Secretory Vesicles, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Vesicular Transport Proteins, Electron Microscope Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review