Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 466

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Analysis of cycloheximide-induced apoptosis in human leukocytes: Fluorescence microscopy using annexin V/propidium iodide versus acridin orange/ethidium bromide

BASKIC, D, POPOVIC, S, RISTIC, P, ARSENIJEVIC, N·2006·Cell Biology International

Abstract

Apoptosis is a highly regulated and programmed cell breakdown process characterized by numerous changes. Since it is implicated in many pathological as well as physiological processes, it is vital to have reliable methods for detecting cell death. In this study, we compared several methods for detecting apoptosis and necrosis in human leukocytes. Apoptosis was induced either by incubating the cells with various doses of cycloheximide (CHX) or by 312 nm UVB irradiation. The methods used for detecting apoptosis were light microscopy (May Grunwald-Giemsa and trypan blue staining), fluorescence microscopy (acridin orange/ethidium bromide and annexin V/propidium iodide staining) and agarose gel electrophoresis of fragmented genomic DNA. Our study showed that CHX-induced apoptosis in cultured peripheral blood mononuclear cells but had no effect on apoptosis in polymorphonuclear cells, so its effect depends on cell type. Evaluation and comparison of the methods for detecting apoptosis showed the following. A Giemsa-stained cytospin allows the main morphological characteristics of necrotic and apoptotic death to be recognized. Trypan blue staining, widely used for estimating cell viability, is valueless for detecting apoptosis. Both fluorescence methods provided reliable and reproducible results and distinguished clearly between subpopulations of apoptotic cells, and were closely intercorrelated. Although applicable to a wide spectrum of cell types, agar electrophoresis of extracted DNA cannot be applied to all cell types and apoptotic conditions. Generally, microscopic examination of acridin orange/ethidium bromide stained cells can be recommended as the most reliable of the methods tested.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cellbi.2006.06.016

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 466

Metadata

Authors
BASKIC, D., POPOVIC, S., RISTIC, P., & ARSENIJEVIC, N.
Venue
Cell Biology International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-11
Volume
30
Issue
11
Pages
924-932
ISSN
1065-6995 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030904288
Cited by
466
References
0
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of cycloheximide-induced apoptosis in human leukocytes: Fluorescence microscopy using annexin V/propidium iodide versus acridin orange/ethidium bromide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cellbi.2006.06.016
The paper
BASKIC, D., POPOVIC, S., RISTIC, P., & ARSENIJEVIC, N. (2006). Analysis of cycloheximide-induced apoptosis in human leukocytes: Fluorescence microscopy using annexin V/propidium iodide versus acridin orange/ethidium bromide. Cell Biology International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellbi.2006.06.016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.