The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of cycloheximide-induced apoptosis in human leukocytes: Fluorescence microscopy using annexin V/propidium iodide versus acridin orange/ethidium bromide
Abstract
Apoptosis is a highly regulated and programmed cell breakdown process characterized by numerous changes. Since it is implicated in many pathological as well as physiological processes, it is vital to have reliable methods for detecting cell death. In this study, we compared several methods for detecting apoptosis and necrosis in human leukocytes. Apoptosis was induced either by incubating the cells with various doses of cycloheximide (CHX) or by 312 nm UVB irradiation. The methods used for detecting apoptosis were light microscopy (May Grunwald-Giemsa and trypan blue staining), fluorescence microscopy (acridin orange/ethidium bromide and annexin V/propidium iodide staining) and agarose gel electrophoresis of fragmented genomic DNA. Our study showed that CHX-induced apoptosis in cultured peripheral blood mononuclear cells but had no effect on apoptosis in polymorphonuclear cells, so its effect depends on cell type. Evaluation and comparison of the methods for detecting apoptosis showed the following. A Giemsa-stained cytospin allows the main morphological characteristics of necrotic and apoptotic death to be recognized. Trypan blue staining, widely used for estimating cell viability, is valueless for detecting apoptosis. Both fluorescence methods provided reliable and reproducible results and distinguished clearly between subpopulations of apoptotic cells, and were closely intercorrelated. Although applicable to a wide spectrum of cell types, agar electrophoresis of extracted DNA cannot be applied to all cell types and apoptotic conditions. Generally, microscopic examination of acridin orange/ethidium bromide stained cells can be recommended as the most reliable of the methods tested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dual AO/EB Staining to Detect Apoptosis in Osteosarcoma Cells Compared with Flow Cytometry
Liu, K., Liu, P.-C., Liu, R., & Wu, X. (2015) · Medical Science Monitor Basic Research · doi:10.12659/msmbr.893327 · Cited by 770
An overview of apoptosis assays detecting DNA fragmentation
Majtnerová, P., & Roušar, T. (2018) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-018-4258-9 · Cited by 330
Vetrano, S., Rescigno, M., Rosaria Cera, M., Correale, C., Rumio, C., Doni, A., Fantini, M., Sturm, A., Borroni, E., Repici, A., et al. (2008) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.002 · Cited by 254
Tada‐Oikawa, S., Oikawa, S., Hirayama, J., Hirakawa, K., & Kawanishi, S. (2009) · Photochemistry and Photobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.2009.00600.x · Cited by 80
Ammar, O., Mehdi, M., Tekeya, O., Neffati, F., & Haouas, Z. (2019) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-019-01579-7 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- BASKIC, D., POPOVIC, S., RISTIC, P., & ARSENIJEVIC, N.
- Venue
- Cell Biology International
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 924-932
- ISSN
- 1065-6995 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030904288
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of cycloheximide-induced apoptosis in human leukocytes: Fluorescence microscopy using annexin V/propidium iodide versus acridin orange/ethidium bromide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cellbi.2006.06.016
- The paper
- BASKIC, D., POPOVIC, S., RISTIC, P., & ARSENIJEVIC, N. (2006). Analysis of cycloheximide-induced apoptosis in human leukocytes: Fluorescence microscopy using annexin V/propidium iodide versus acridin orange/ethidium bromide. Cell Biology International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellbi.2006.06.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.