Cited by 16

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RhoH plays distinct roles in T-cell migrations induced by different doses of SDF1α

Wang, Hong, Zeng, Xin, Fan, Zhigang, Lim, Bing·2010·Cellular Signalling

Abstract

Hematopoietic-specific RhoGTPase RhoH displays an important role in regulating T-cell development, a process that is accompanied by ordered and directed migration of progenitors through thymus. While RhoGTPases are key regulators of cytokinesis, the precise role of RhoH in T-cell migration is unknown. Here, by using Jurkat cell migration as a model, we found that RhoH is required for cell migration in response to the high concentration of SDF1 alpha but displays inhibitory roles in regulating migration in the absence of SDF1 alpha or in the range of low concentrations. We further found that RhoH-mediated migration requires PAK1 but not ITK. Indeed, both the low and high concentrations of SDF1 alpha activate PAK1 but only the high concentration-induced activation of PAK1 requires RhoH. Further study of the RhoH-PAK interaction revealed that RhoH is able to bind and activate PAK1, indicating that RhoH plays a positive role in response to the high concentration of SDF1 alpha. In contrast, at rest, RhoH indirectly inhibits Slp76/ITK activity through its modulation on TCR signaling, supporting a negative regulatory role for RhoH when SDF1 alpha is insufficient to activate the RhoH-PAK1 pathway. Together, our study uncovered a dual role for RhoH in SDF1 alpha signaling in T-cell responses.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.02.005

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Takahama, 2006, Nat. Rev. Immunol., 6, 127, 10.1038/nri1781 · DOI
  2. Misslitz, 2006, Immunol. Rev., 209, 115, 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2006.00351.x · DOI
  3. Petrie, 2003, Nat. Rev. Immunol., 3, 859, 10.1038/nri1223 · DOI
  4. Petrie, 2007, Annu. Rev. Immunol., 25, 649, 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115715 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Prockop, 2002, J. Immunol., 169, 4354, 10.4049/jimmunol.169.8.4354 · DOI
  6. Boehm, 2006, Trends Immunol., 27, 477, 10.1016/j.it.2006.08.004 · DOI
  7. Viola, 2008, Front. Biosci., 13, 6341, 10.2741/3158 · DOI
  8. Fu, 2004, Cell. Mol. Immunol., 1, 266
  9. Kucia, 2004, J. Mol. Histol., 35, 233, 10.1023/B:HIJO.0000032355.66152.b8 · DOI
  10. Kim, 1999, J. Leukoc. Biol., 65, 6, 10.1002/jlb.65.1.6 · DOI
  11. Poznansky, 2002, J. Clin. Invest., 109, 1101, 10.1172/JCI0213853 · DOI
  12. Ara, 2003, J. Immunol., 170, 4649, 10.4049/jimmunol.170.9.4649 · DOI
  13. Sanchez-Madrid, 1999, Embo J., 18, 501, 10.1093/emboj/18.3.501 · DOI
  14. Ridley, 2003, Science, 302, 1704, 10.1126/science.1092053 · DOI
  15. Haddad, 2001, Blood, 97, 33, 10.1182/blood.V97.1.33 · DOI
  16. Nishita, 2002, Mol. Cell. Biol., 22, 774, 10.1128/MCB.22.3.774-783.2002 · DOI
  17. Arai, 2005, Cell. Signal., 17, 497, 10.1016/j.cellsig.2004.09.007 · DOI
  18. Takesono, 2004, Curr. Biol., 14, 917, 10.1016/j.cub.2004.04.011 · DOI
  19. Volinsky, 2006, Biochem. J., 397, 213, 10.1042/BJ20051655 · DOI
  20. Bubeck Wardenburg, 1998, Immunity, 9, 607, 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80658-5 · DOI
  21. Van Aelst, 1997, Genes Dev., 11, 2295, 10.1101/gad.11.18.2295 · DOI
  22. Bishop, 2000, Biochem. J., 348, 241, 10.1042/bj3480241 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Matozaki, 2000, Cell. Signal., 12, 515, 10.1016/S0898-6568(00)00102-9 · DOI
  24. Koch, 1994, Biochem. J., 299, 775, 10.1042/bj2990775 · DOI
  25. Laudanna, 1996, Science, 271, 981, 10.1126/science.271.5251.981 · DOI
  26. Allen, 1997, J. Cell. Sci., 110, 707, 10.1242/jcs.110.6.707 · DOI
  27. Cox, 1997, J. Exp. Med., 186, 1487, 10.1084/jem.186.9.1487 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Jaffer, 2002, Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol., 34, 713, 10.1016/S1357-2725(01)00158-3 · DOI
  29. Bokoch, 2003, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 72, 743, 10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161742 · DOI
  30. Lei, 2000, Cell, 102, 387, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00043-X · DOI
  31. Abo, 1998, Embo J., 17, 6527, 10.1093/emboj/17.22.6527 · DOI
  32. Dallery-Prudhomme, 1997, Genomics, 43, 89, 10.1006/geno.1997.4788 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Dorn, 2007, Blood, 109, 2346, 10.1182/blood-2006-04-019034 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Foster, 1996, Mol. Cell. Biol., 16, 2689, 10.1128/MCB.16.6.2689 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Riento, 2005, Biochem. Soc. Trans., 33, 649, 10.1042/BST0330649 · DOI
  36. Cherry, 2004, Nat. Immunol., 5, 961, 10.1038/ni1103 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Gu, 2005, Blood, 105, 1467, 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1604 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Dallery, 1995, Oncogene, 10, 2171
  39. Yang, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 15345, 10.1074/jbc.M010311200 · DOI
  40. Moffat, 2006, Cell, 124, 1283, 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.040 · DOI
  41. Wang, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 25241, 10.1074/jbc.M401356200 · DOI
  42. Fischer, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 29816, 10.1074/jbc.M312848200 · DOI
  43. Wu, 2006, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 351, 328, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.09.172 · DOI
  44. Zaman, 2008, J. Leukoc. Biol., 84, 1082, 10.1189/jlb.1007698 · DOI
  45. Qi, 2007, Sci. STKE., 396
  46. Gupta, 2001, Immunol. Lett., 78, 29, 10.1016/S0165-2478(01)00228-0 · DOI
  47. Balabanian, 2005, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 5760, 10.1074/jbc.M508234200 · DOI
  48. Valentin, 2007, Curr. Biol., 17, 1026, 10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.020 · DOI
  49. Burns, 2006, J Exp Med., 203, 2201, 10.1084/jem.20052144 · DOI
  50. Hartmann, 2008, J. Leukoc. Biol., 84, 1130, 10.1189/jlb.0208088 · DOI
  51. Poznansky, 2000, Nat. Med., 6, 543, 10.1038/75022 · DOI
  52. Kiosses, 1999, J. Cell. Biol., 147, 831, 10.1083/jcb.147.4.831 · DOI
  53. Schwartz, 2006, Cell, 125, 1223, 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.015 · DOI
  54. Pasqualucci, 2001, Nature, 412, 341, 10.1038/35085588 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 16

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RhoH plays distinct roles in T-cell migrations induced by different doses of SDF1α. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.02.005
The paper
Wang, H., Zeng, X., Fan, Z., & Lim, B. (2010). RhoH plays distinct roles in T-cell migrations induced by different doses of SDF1α. Cellular Signalling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.02.005