Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inference of Tumor Evolution during Chemotherapy by Computational Modeling and In Situ Analysis of Genetic and Phenotypic Cellular Diversity

Open access
Almendro, Vanessa, Cheng, Yu-Kang, Randles, Amanda, Itzkovitz, Shalev, Marusyk, Andriy, Ametller, Elisabet, Gonzalez-Farre, Xavier, Muñoz, Montse, Russnes, Hege G., Helland, Åslaug, Rye, Inga H., Borresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Maruyama, Reo, van Oudenaarden, Alexander, Dowsett, Mitchell, Jones, Robin L., Reis-Filho, Jorge, Gascon, Pere, Gönen, Mithat, Michor, Franziska, Polyak, Kornelia·2014·Cell Reports

Abstract

Cancer therapy exerts a strong selection pressure that shapes tumor evolution, yet our knowledge of how tumors change during treatment is limited. Here, we report the analysis of cellular heterogeneity for genetic and phenotypic features and their spatial distribution in breast tumors pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We found that intratumor genetic diversity was tumor-subtype specific, and it did not change during treatment in tumors with partial or no response. However, lower pretreatment genetic diversity was significantly associated with pathologic complete response. In contrast, phenotypic diversity was different between pre- and posttreatment samples. We also observed significant changes in the spatial distribution of cells with distinct genetic and phenotypic features. We used these experimental data to develop a stochastic computational model to infer tumor growth patterns and evolutionary dynamics. Our results highlight the importance of integrated analysis of genotypes and phenotypes of single cells in intact tissues to predict tumor evolution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.12.041

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Almendro, V., Cheng, Y.-K., Randles, A., Itzkovitz, S., Marusyk, A., Ametller, E., Gonzalez-Farre, X., Muñoz, M., Russnes, H. G., Helland, Å., Rye, I. H., Borresen-Dale, A.-L., Maruyama, R., van Oudenaarden, A., Dowsett, M., Jones, R. L., Reis-Filho, J., Gascon, P., Gönen, M., Michor, F., & Polyak, K.
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
514-527
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148847151
Cited by
274
References
7
FWCI
12.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inference of Tumor Evolution during Chemotherapy by Computational Modeling and In Situ Analysis of Genetic and Phenotypic Cellular Diversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.12.041
The paper
Almendro, V., Cheng, Y.-K., Randles, A., Itzkovitz, S., Marusyk, A., Ametller, E., Gonzalez-Farre, X., Muñoz, M., Russnes, H. G., Helland, Å., Rye, I. H., Borresen-Dale, A.-L., Maruyama, R., van Oudenaarden, A., Dowsett, M., Jones, R. L., Reis-Filho, J., Gascon, P., Gönen, M., . . . Polyak, K. (2014). Inference of Tumor Evolution during Chemotherapy by Computational Modeling and In Situ Analysis of Genetic and Phenotypic Cellular Diversity. Cell Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.12.041

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.