Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metabolic endotoxemia is dictated by the type of lipopolysaccharide

Open access
Anhê, Fernando F., Barra, Nicole G., Cavallari, Joseph F., Henriksbo, Brandyn D., Schertzer, Jonathan D.·2021·Cell Reports

Abstract

Abstract Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) can promote metabolic endotoxemia, which is considered inflammatory and metabolically detrimental based on Toll-like receptor (TLR)4 agonists such as Escherichia coli -derived LPS. LPS from certain bacteria antagonize TLR4 yet contribute to endotoxemia measured by Endotoxin Units (EU). We found that E. coli LPS impaired gut barrier function and worsened glycemic control in mice, but equal doses of LPS from other bacteria did not. Matching the LPS dose from R. sphaeroides and E. coli by EU revealed that only E. coli LPS promoted dysglycemia, adipose inflammation, delayed intestinal glucose absorption, and augmented insulin and GLP-1 secretion. Metabolically beneficial endotoxemia promoted by R. sphaeroides LPS counteracted dysglycemia caused by an equal dose of E. coli LPS and promoted insulin sensitivity in obese mice. The concept of metabolic endotoxemia should be expanded beyond LPS load (EU) to include LPS characteristics, where the balance of deleterious and beneficial endotoxemia regulates host metabolism. Highlights Type of LPS dictates gut barrier function, inflammation, insulin, GLP-1, intestinal glucose absorption and blood glucose Endotoxin Units (EU) do not reflect how LPS influences blood glucose or hormones LPS derived from certain types of bacteria are insulin sensitizers R. sphaeroides LPS promotes metabolically beneficial endotoxemia LPS characteristics dictate metabolically beneficial versus deleterious endotoxemia

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109691

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Anhê, F. F., Barra, N. G., Cavallari, J. F., Henriksbo, B. D., & Schertzer, J. D.
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
36
Issue
11
Pages
109691
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3201181612
Cited by
175
References
8
FWCI
6.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolic endotoxemia is dictated by the type of lipopolysaccharide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109691
The paper
Anhê, F. F., Barra, N. G., Cavallari, J. F., Henriksbo, B. D., & Schertzer, J. D. (2021). Metabolic endotoxemia is dictated by the type of lipopolysaccharide. Cell Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109691

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.