Cited by 25

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nanoscale and functional heterogeneity of the hippocampal extracellular space

Grassi, Diego, Idziak, Agata, Lee, Antony, Calaresu, Ivo, Sibarita, Jean-Baptiste, Cognet, Laurent, Nägerl, U. Valentin, Groc, Laurent·2023·Cell Reports

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112478

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Syková, 2008, Diffusion in brain extracellular space, Physiol. Rev., 88, 1277, 10.1152/physrev.00027.2007 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Nicholson, 2000, Diffusion of molecules in brain extracellular space: theory and experiment, Prog. Brain Res., 125, 129, 10.1016/S0079-6123(00)25007-3 · DOI
  3. Rasmussen, 2022, Fluid transport in the brain, Physiol. Rev., 102, 1025, 10.1152/physrev.00031.2020 · DOI
  4. Godin, 2017, Single-nanotube tracking reveals the nanoscale organization of the extracellular space in the live brain, Nat. Nanotechnol., 12, 238, 10.1038/nnano.2016.248 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Tonnesen, 2018, Super-resolution imaging of the extracellular space in living brain tissue, Cell, 172, 1108, 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.007 · DOI
  6. Goode, 2020, An integrated index: engrams, place cells, and hippocampal memory, Neuron, 107, 805, 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.07.011 · DOI
  7. Sherwood, 2021, NMDARs, coincidence detectors of astrocytic and neuronal activities, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22, 7258, 10.3390/ijms22147258 · DOI
  8. Bartsch, 2015, Selective neuronal vulnerability of human hippocampal CA1 neurons: lesion evolution, temporal course, and pattern of hippocampal damage in diffusion-weighted MR imaging, J. Cerebr. Blood Flow Metabol., 35, 1836, 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.137 · DOI
  9. Alkadhi, 2019, Cellular and molecular differences between area CA1 and the dentate gyrus of the Hippocampus, Mol. Neurobiol., 56, 6566, 10.1007/s12035-019-1541-2 · DOI
  10. Zheng, 2017, Nanoscale diffusion in the synaptic cleft and beyond measured with time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy imaging, Sci. Rep., 7, 42022, 10.1038/srep42022 · DOI
  11. McBain, 1990, Regional variation of extracellular space in the hippocampus, Science, 249, 674, 10.1126/science.2382142 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hrabetová, 2005, Extracellular diffusion is fast and isotropic in the stratum radiatum of hippocampal CA1 region in rat brain slices, Hippocampus, 15, 441, 10.1002/hipo.20068 · DOI
  13. Saghyan, 2012, Extracellular diffusion in laminar brain structures exemplified by hippocampus, J. Neurosci. Methods, 205, 110, 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.12.008 · DOI
  14. Arranz, 2014, Hyaluronan deficiency due to Has3 knock-out causes altered neuronal activity and seizures via reduction in brain extracellular space, J. Neurosci., 34, 6164, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3458-13.2014 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Pérez-Pinzón, 1995, Extracellular potassium, volume fraction, and tortuosity in rat hippocampal CA1, CA3, and cortical slices during ischemia, J. Neurophysiol., 74, 565, 10.1152/jn.1995.74.2.565 · DOI
  16. Varela, 2016, Targeting neurotransmitter receptors with nanoparticles in vivo allows single-molecule tracking in acute brain slices, Nat. Commun., 7, 10947, 10.1038/ncomms10947 · DOI
  17. Wang, 2021, Real-time dissecting the dynamics of drug transportation in the live brain, Nano Lett., 21, 642, 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04216 · DOI
  18. Wegner, 2015, Quantum dots: bright and versatile in vitro and in vivo fluorescence imaging biosensors, Chem. Soc. Rev., 44, 4792, 10.1039/C4CS00532E · DOI
  19. Dahan, 2003, Diffusion dynamics of glycine receptors revealed by single-quantum dot tracking, Science, 302, 442, 10.1126/science.1088525 · DOI
  20. Groc, 2020, Linking glutamate receptor movements and synapse function, Science, 368, eaay4631, 10.1126/science.aay4631 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Groc, 2004, Differential activity-dependent regulation of the lateral mobilities of AMPA and NMDA receptors, Nat. Neurosci., 7, 695, 10.1038/nn1270 · DOI
  22. Murphy-Royal, 2015, Surface diffusion of astrocytic glutamate transporters shapes synaptic transmission, Nat. Neurosci., 18, 219, 10.1038/nn.3901 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Rosendale, 2021, A bottom-up approach to red-emitting molecular-based nanoparticles with natural stealth properties and their use for single-particle tracking deep in brain tissue, Adv. Mater., 33, e2006644, 10.1002/adma.202006644 · DOI
  24. Park, 2012, Influence of synaptic vesicle position on release probability and exocytotic fusion mode, Science, 335, 1362, 10.1126/science.1216937 · DOI
  25. Neef, 2014, Modes and regulation of endocytic membrane retrieval in mouse auditory hair cells, J. Neurosci., 34, 705, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3313-13.2014 · DOI
  26. Larsen, 2019, Developmental maturation of activity-induced K(+) and pH transients and the associated extracellular space dynamics in the rat hippocampus, J. Physiol., 597, 583, 10.1113/JP276768 · DOI
  27. Hrabetova, 2018, Unveiling the extracellular space of the brain: from super-resolved microstructure to in vivo function, J. Neurosci., 38, 9355, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1664-18.2018 · DOI
  28. Mazel, 1998, Diffusion heterogeneity and anisotropy in rat hippocampus, Neuroreport, 9, 1299, 10.1097/00001756-199805110-00008 · DOI
  29. Griffiths, 2019, Age-dependent sexual dimorphism in hippocampal cornu ammonis-1 perineuronal net expression in rats, Brain Behav., 9, e01265, 10.1002/brb3.1265 · DOI
  30. Levet, 2020, SpineJ: a software tool for quantitative analysis of nanoscale spine morphology, Methods, 174, 49, 10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.01.020 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Grassi, D., Idziak, A., Lee, A., Calaresu, I., Sibarita, J.-B., Cognet, L., Nägerl, U. V., & Groc, L.
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-05
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
112478
ISSN
2211-1247
Cited by
25
References
7
Language
en
Funders
  • Conseil Régional Aquitaine
  • Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0019, RGP0041/2019)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-14-OHRI-0001-01, ANR-15-CE16-0004-03)
  • Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
  • Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  • Université de Bordeaux (845542)
  • European Research Council (951294)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review