Cited by 17Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsProtein Structure and DynamicsS100 Proteins and Annexins

High-throughput identification of calcium-regulated proteins across diverse proteomes

Open access
Locke, Timothy M., Fields, Rose, Gizinski, Hayden, Otto, George M., MacEwen, Melissa J.S., Rusnac, Domnita-Valeria, He, Peixian, Shechner, David M., McGann, Chris D., Berg, Matthew D., Villen, Judit, Sancak, Yasemin, Schweppe, Devin K.·2024·Cell Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Calcium ions play important roles in nearly every biological process, yet whole-proteome analysis of calcium effectors has been hindered by lack of high-throughput, unbiased, and quantitative methods to identify proteins-calcium engagement. To address this, we adapted protein thermostability assays in the budding yeast, human cells, and mouse mitochondria. Based on calcium-dependent thermostability, we identified 2884 putative calcium-regulated proteins across human, mouse, and yeast proteomes. These data revealed calcium engagement of novel signaling hubs and cellular processes, including metabolic enzymes and the spliceosome. Cross-species comparison of calcium-protein engagement and mutagenesis experiments identified residue-specific cation engagement, even within well-known EF-hand domains. Additionally, we found that the dienoyl-CoA reductase DECR1 binds calcium at physiologically-relevant concentrations with substrate-specific affinity, suggesting direct calcium regulation of mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation. These unbiased, proteomic analyses of calcium effectors establish a key resource to dissect cation engagement and its mechanistic effects across multiple species and diverse biological processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114879

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Locke, T. M., Fields, R., Gizinski, H., Otto, G. M., MacEwen, M. J. S., Rusnac, D.-V., He, P., Shechner, D. M., McGann, C. D., Berg, M. D., Villen, J., Sancak, Y., & Schweppe, D. K.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
  • Sancak, Yasemin
  • Schweppe, Devin K.
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-11
Volume
43
Issue
11
Pages
114879
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403530186
Cited by
17
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R35GM150919-01)
  • W. M. Keck Foundation
  • Pew Charitable Trusts
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › S100 Proteins and Annexins
Keywords
EF-hand domain, DECR1, mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation, spliceosome, metabolic enzymes, cation binding, cross-species comparison, yeast, human cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review