Cited by 122Fluid Dynamics and MixingAlgal biology and biofuel productionGranular flow and fluidized beds

Verification and validation of CFD simulations for local flow dynamics in a draft tube airlift bioreactor

Luo, Hu-Ping, Al-Dahhan, Muthanna H.·2011·Chemical Engineering Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ces.2010.11.038

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luo, H.-P., & Al-Dahhan, M. H.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Luo, Hu-Ping
Venue
Chemical Engineering Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
66
Issue
5
Pages
907-923
ISSN
0009-2509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091499162
Cited by
122
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemical Engineering Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Granular flow and fluidized beds
Keywords
airlift bioreactor, photobioreactors, particle tracking, residence time, recirculation, wall functions, grid resolution, tracer trajectories, mixing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review