Cited by 30Chronic Disease Management StrategiesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesFrailty in Older Adults

Magnitude and Impact of Multimorbidity on Clinical Outcomes in Older Adults with Cardiovascular Disease

Open access
Tisminetzky, Mayra, Goldberg, Robert, Gurwitz, Jerry H.·2016·Clinics in Geriatric Medicine

Abstract

The authors aim to synthesize the current literature on the magnitude and impact of multimorbidity on clinical outcomes in older adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Most studies reported a significant association between the number of morbidities and the risk of dying. Multimorbidity was assessed either by counting the number of conditions or by use of the Charlson or Elixhauser indices. There are limited data available on the magnitude and impact of multimorbidity on clinical outcomes in patients with CVD and essentially no data on universal health outcomes (eg, health-related quality of life, symptom burden, and function).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cger.2016.01.014

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of comorbid diseases affects treatment response and prognosis for hard clinical outcomes such as cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, hospitalization, and health-care utilization.

    “The presence of comorbid diseases is well established to affect both the response to treatment and the prognosis for hard clinical outcomes, such as cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, as well as hospitalization and health-care utilization”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tisminetzky, M., Goldberg, R., & Gurwitz, J. H.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Gurwitz, Jerry H.
Venue
Clinics in Geriatric Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
227-246
ISSN
0749-0690 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2337199893
Cited by
30
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinics in Geriatric Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R21AG045320, R24AG045050)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL105268, R01HL035434)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
multimorbidity, cardiovascular disease, older adults, mortality risk, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Elixhauser comorbidity index, health-related quality of life, symptom burden, functional status, clinical outcomes
MeSH terms
Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Patient Care Management, Comorbidity, Patient Outcome Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review