Cited by 62

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Patients With Chronic Liver Disease Suggestive of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease May Be at Higher Risk for Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Lammert, Craig, Imler, Timothy, Teal, Evgenia, Chalasani, Naga·2019·Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

To date, there have been no studies that systematically examined if individuals with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) have an increased risk of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). We conducted a study to test if the frequency of suspected DILI from prescription agents is higher in individuals with chronic liver disease (CLD) suggestive of NAFLD.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.12.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Chalasani, 2015, Features and outcomes of 899 patients with drug-induced liver injury: the DILIN prospective study, Gastroenterology, 148, 1340, 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Aithal, 2011, Case definition and phenotype standardization in drug-induced liver injury, Clin Pharmacol Ther, 89, 806, 10.1038/clpt.2011.58 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Tarantino, 2007, A prospective study of acute drug-induced liver injury in patients suffering from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, Hepatol Res, 37, 410, 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2007.00072.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lammert, C., Imler, T., Teal, E., & Chalasani, N.
Venue
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
17
Issue
13
Pages
2814-2815
ISSN
1542-3565
Cited by
62
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review