The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring motivations for contributing to open source initiatives: The roles of contribution context and personal values
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 · Cited by 18,666
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619
A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0047358 · Cited by 8,686
The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews
Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345 · Cited by 6,003
Lakhani, K. R., & Wolf, R. G. (2003) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.443040 · Cited by 1,531
Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study
von Krogh, G., Spaeth, S., & Lakhani, K. R. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00050-7 · Cited by 1,025 · cited 1×
“As noted above, the open source software development process involves an intensive peer-review mechanism, through which contributors receive feedback from peers in the project team, from software users, and from interested outsiders (von Krogh et al., 2003).”
BackgroundValues, environmental attitudes, and buying of organic foods
Grunert, S. C., & Juhl, H. J. (1995) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/0167-4870(94)00034-8 · Cited by 766
The power of gifts: organizing social relationships in open source communities
Bergquist, M., & Ljungberg, J. (2001) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2575.2001.00111.x · Cited by 480 · cited 4×
“Software projects have ‘‘owners’’ who initiate projects and have the right to redistribute modified versions of the software ( Bergquist & Ljungberg, 2001 ).”
BackgroundInfluentialGift economies in the development of open source software: anthropological reflections
Zeitlyn, D. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00053-2 · Cited by 247
Cited by
The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption
Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2016) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23552 · Cited by 3,439
Carrots and Rainbows: Motivation and Social Practice in Open Source Software Development1
von Krogh, G., Haefliger, S., Spaeth, S., & Wallin, M. W. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41703471 · Cited by 698
Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community: a multidimensional perspective
Nov, O., Naaman, M., & Ye, C. (2010) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21278 · Cited by 263
Self-citationUnderstanding Human-Machine Networks: A Cross-Disciplinary Survey
Tsvetkova, M., Yasseri, T., Meyer, E. T., Pickering, J. B., Engen, V., Walland, P., Lüders, M., Følstad, A., & Bravos, G. (2018) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3039868 · Cited by 67
Governing Open Source Software Through Coordination Processes
Shaikh, M., & Henfridsson, O. (2017) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2017.04.001 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Oreg, S., & Nov, O.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2055-2073
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007323286
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 30.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
