Cited by 102Social Robot Interaction and HRIEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorFace Recognition and Perception

Sensitivity to the proportions of faces that vary in human likeness

Green, Robert D., MacDorman, Karl F., Ho, Chin-Chang, Vasudevan, Sandosh·2008·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.019

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Green, R. D., MacDorman, K. F., Ho, C.-C., & Vasudevan, S.
Affiliations
Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Corresponding author
MacDorman, Karl F.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
2456-2474
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991405702
Cited by
102
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
facial proportions, human-likeness, facial attractiveness, human perception, Android, video game design, virtual reality, human-robot interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review