CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Five facets of social presence in online distance education

Sung, Eunmo, Mayer, Richard E.·2012·Computers in Human Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.014
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.014

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Aragon, 2003, Creating social presence in online environments, New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100, 57, 10.1002/ace.119 · DOI
  2. Argyle, 1965, Eye contact, distance and affiliation, Sociometry, 28, 289, 10.2307/2786027 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bentler, 1980, Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures, Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588, 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · DOI
  4. Biocca, 2003, Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria, Presence: Teleoperators & Virutal Environments, 12, 456, 10.1162/105474603322761270 · DOI
  5. Breckler, 1990, Applications of covariance structure modeling in psychology: Cause for concern?, Psychological Bulletin, 107, 260, 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.260 · DOI
  6. Cobb, 2009, Social presence and online learning: A current view from a research perspective, Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8, 241
  7. Curran, 1996, The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis, Psychological Methods, 1, 16, 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16 · DOI · Paper page
  8. de Bruyn, 2004, Monitoring online communication: Can the development of convergence and social presence indicate an interactive learning environment?, Distance Education, 25, 67, 10.1080/0158791042000212468 · DOI
  9. Gunawardena, 1995, Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences, International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1, 147
  10. Gunawardena, 1997, Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment, The American Journal of Distance Education, 11, 8, 10.1080/08923649709526970 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Hughes, 2007, Assessing social presence in online discussion groups: A replication study, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44, 17, 10.1080/14703290601090366 · DOI
  12. Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (2004). LISREL 8.7. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc. · DOI
  13. Kehrwald, 2010, Being online: Social presence and subjectivity in online learning, London Review of Education, 8, 39, 10.1080/14748460903557688 · DOI
  14. Kim, 2011, Developing an instrument to measure social presence in distance higher education, British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 763, 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01107.x · DOI
  15. Leh, 2001, Computer-mediated communication and social presence in a distance learning environment, International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7, 109
  16. MacCallum, 1992, Model modification in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance, Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490, 10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.490 · DOI
  17. McInnerney, 2004, Online learning: Social interaction and the creation of a sense of community, Educational Technology & Society, 7, 73
  18. Rice, 1993, Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media, Human Communication Research, 19, 451, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00309.x · DOI
  19. Richardson, 2003, Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 68
  20. Rifkind, 1992, Immediacy as a predictor of teacher effectiveness in the instructional television, Journal of Interactive Television, 1, 31
  21. Rourke, 2001, Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing, Journal of Distance Education, 14, 50
  22. Rovai, 2001, Building classroom community at a distance: A case study, Educational Technology Research and Development Journal, 49, 33, 10.1007/BF02504946 · DOI
  23. Rovai, 2002, Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks, Internet and Higher Education, 5, 319, 10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00130-6 · DOI
  24. Russo, 2005, Learning with invisible others: Perceptions of online presence and their relationship to cognitive and affective learning, Educational Technology & Society, 8, 54
  25. Schimke, 2007, The relationship between social presence and group identification within online communities and its impact on the success of online communities, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4564, 160, 10.1007/978-3-540-73257-0_18 · DOI
  26. Song, 2004, Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics, Internet and Higher Education, 7, 59, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.003 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Tu, 2002, The measurement of social presence in an online learning environment, International Journal on E-Learning, 1, 34
  28. Tu, 2002, Relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes, The Journal of Distance Education, 16, 131, 10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_2 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Vonderwell, 2003, An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study, Internet and Higher Education, 6, 77, 10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00164-1 · DOI
  30. Walther, 1992, Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective, Communication Research, 19, 52, 10.1177/009365092019001003 · DOI
  31. Woods, 2002, How much communication is enough in online courses? Exploring the relationship between frequency of instructor-initiated personal email and learners’ perceptions of and participation in online learning, International Journal of Instructional Media, 29, 377
  32. Yen, 2011, A multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis of the scores for online presence: Do they measure the same thing across cultural groups?, Educational Computing Research, 44, 219, 10.2190/EC.44.2.e · DOI
  33. Yoon, 2003, In search of meaningful online learning experiences, New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100, 19, 10.1002/ace.116 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
1738-1747
ISSN
0747-5632
DOI
10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.014
Cited by
255
References
7
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review