The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collaboration factors, teamwork satisfaction, and student attitudes toward online collaborative learning
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 53,488
Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research
Prince, M. (2004) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x · Cited by 7,334 · cited 2×
“The distinction between collaborative learning and cooperative learning is ‘‘the emphasis on student interactions rather than on learning as an individual or private activity’’ (Prince, 2004, p. 1).”
BackgroundHow many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis
Green, S. B. (1991) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7 · Cited by 3,916 · cited 10×
“Group dynamics can be conceptualized as falling into the following categories: participation, communication, collaboration, trust, and cohesion (Greenlee & Karanxha, 2010). Those categories are interrelated and are highly correlated to each others. Frequency and quality of communication can encourage team members to e…”
BackgroundInfluentialSun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007 · Cited by 2,726
Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (1975) · Cited by 2,314
Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness
Maznevski, M. L., & Chudoba, K. M. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.5.473.15200 · Cited by 1,773
The evolution of research on collaborative learning
Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M. J., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. L. (1995) · HAL · Cited by 1,409
Effects of Anonymity and Evaluative Tone on Idea Generation in Computer-Mediated Groups
Connolly, T., Jessup, L. M., & Valacich, J. S. (1990) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.6.689 · Cited by 849
Johnson, S. D., Aragon, S. R., Shaik, N., & Palma‐Rivas, N. (2000) · The Journal of Interactive Learning Research · doi:10.5555/344452.344454 · Cited by 620
Learning on Demand: Online Education in the United States, 2009.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010) · Cited by 521
Cited by
Baber, H. (2020) · Journal of Education and e-Learning Research · doi:10.20448/journal.509.2020.73.285.292 · Cited by 716
Online learner engagement: Conceptual definitions, research themes, and supportive practices
Martin, F., & Borup, J. (2022) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2022.2089147 · Cited by 220
Towards a generalized competency model of collaborative problem solving
Sun, C., Shute, V. J., Stewart, A., Yonehiro, J., Duran, N., & D'Mello, S. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103672 · Cited by 189
Zheng, L., Zhong, L., & Niu, J. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1883549 · Cited by 75
Issa, T., & Hall, M. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38759 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Ku, H.-Y., Tseng, H. W., & Akarasriworn, C.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 922-929
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031545757
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 73.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collaboration factors, teamwork satisfaction, and student attitudes toward online collaborative learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.019
- The paper
- Ku, H.-Y., Tseng, H. W., & Akarasriworn, C. (2013). Collaboration factors, teamwork satisfaction, and student attitudes toward online collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
