Cited by 220Online and Blended LearningVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesOnline Learning and Analytics

Online learner engagement: Conceptual definitions, research themes, and supportive practices

Martin, Florence, Borup, Jered·2022·Educational Psychologist

Abstract

Online learning has increased in prominence across all levels of education, despite reported learner engagement being lower online than during in-person learning. Most learner engagement research and frameworks have focused on in-person learning environments but new frameworks and strategies for online learner engagement are emerging. In this article, we integrate scholarship from educational technology with scholarship from educational psychology and the learning sciences to argue for a reconceptualization of online learner engagement that considers both critical dimensions of learner engagement and the environmental affordances that influence them. We review literature on cognitive, affective, and behavioral engagement, translating it to online contexts. We introduce five research themes and accompanying frameworks from online learning research that have shaped understanding of learner engagement in online learning environments (i.e., engagement through communication, interaction, presence, collaboration, and community). With this new perspective that synthesizes the dimensions of learner engagement and online environmental affordances, we expand online learner engagement scholarship. Finally, leveraging this reconceptualization, we share an exemplar framework and strategies for supporting online learner engagement followed by recommendations for future research and practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00461520.2022.2089147

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The positive effects of SI are consistent with prior research indicating that social expectations, peer endorsement, and collective support can shape users' acceptance of new technologies.

    “Similarly, the positive effects of SI are consistent with prior research indicating that social expectations, peer endorsement, and collective support can shape users’ acceptance of new technologies [61,103,104,105,106].”
  • Martin and Borup (2022) found that affective engagement can increase when others in a student's course community facilitate communication, develop relationships, and instill an excitement for learning.

    “Martin and Borup (2022) found that affective engagement can increase when others in a student’s course community facilitate communication, develop relationships, and instill an excitement for learning.”
  • Research presents a struggle to find a clear centralized definition of engagement for online learning, and some have proposed that engagement be clearly defined by the researcher.

    “Research presents a struggle to find a clear centralized definition of engagement for online learning (Martin & Borup, 2022), and some have proposed that engagement be clearly defined by the researcher (Christenson et al., 2012).”
  • Affective engagement can increase when others in a student's course community facilitate communication, develop relationships, and instill an excitement for learning.

    “Martin and Borup (2022) found that affective engagement can increase when others in a student's course community facilitate communication, develop relationships, and instill an excitement for learning.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, F., & Borup, J.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
  • George Mason University (US)
Corresponding author
Martin, Florence
Venue
Educational Psychologist
Published
2022-07-03
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
162-177
ISSN
  • 0046-1520 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6985
OpenAlex
W4285083760
Cited by
220
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 14
FWCI
97.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Psychologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
cognitive engagement, emotional engagement, behavioral engagement, virtual learning environments, environmental affordances, online collaboration, online communities, student interaction, engagement framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review