Cited by 86Impact of Technology on AdolescentsDigital Communication and LanguageChild Development and Digital Technology

Practice makes perfect: The longitudinal effect of adolescents’ instant messaging on their ability to initiate offline friendships

Koutamanis, Maria, Vossen, Helen G.M., Peter, Jochen, Valkenburg, Patti M.·2013·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.033

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koutamanis, M., Vossen, H. G. M., Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Koutamanis, Maria
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
2265-2272
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142159624
Cited by
86
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
19.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
instant messaging, adolescents, social skills, online-offline relationship, social media use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review