Cited by 20Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityUsability and User Interface Design

A snapshot of the first encounters of visually disabled users with the Web

Open access
Vigo, Markel, Harper, Simon·2014·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.045

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vigo, M., & Harper, S.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Vigo, Markel
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
34
Pages
203-212
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136189662
Cited by
20
References
51
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
11.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Eusko Jaurlaritza
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
visually impaired users, assistive technology, web navigation, novice users, user adaptation, task efficiency, user autonomy, web accessibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review