Cited by 1,278Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Mechanisms of Memory

Squire, Larry R.·1986·Science

Abstract

Recent studies of animals with complex nervous systems, including humans and other primates, have improved our understanding of how the brain accomplishes learning and memory. Major themes of recent work include the locus of memory storage, the taxonomy of memory, the distinction between declarative and procedural knowledge, and the question of how memory changes with time, that is, the concepts of forgetting and consolidation. An important recent advance is the development of an animal model of human amnesia in the monkey. The animal model, together with newly available neuropathological information from a well-studied human patient, has permitted the identification of brain structures and connections involved in memory functions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.3086978

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to human cognitive psychology, memory is categorized into declarative memory and non-declarative memory.

    “According to human cognitive psychology, memory is categorized into declarative memory and non-declarative memory (Squire, 1986).”

    From EvolMem: A Cognitive-Driven Benchmark for Multi-Session Dialogue Memory (2026) · cites this paper as Squire, 1986

  • Human memory includes non-declarative systems that rely on distinct mechanisms and support habits and implicit knowledge.

    “From a cognitive psychology perspective, however, human memory also includes non-declarative systems that rely on distinct mechanisms and support habits and implicit knowledge (Squire, 1986).”

    From EvolMem: A Cognitive-Driven Benchmark for Multi-Session Dialogue Memory (2026) · cites this paper as Squire, 1986

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Squire, L. R.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Squire, Larry R.
Venue
Science
Published
1986-06-27
Volume
232
Issue
4758
Pages
1612-1619
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1969735301
Cited by
1,278
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 28
FWCI
38.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH24600)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
memory mechanisms, memory storage, declarative memory, procedural memory, forgetting, memory consolidation, amnesia, primate brain
MeSH terms
Alcohol Amnestic Disorder, Amnesia, Amnesia, Retrograde, Amygdala, Animals, Haplorhini, Brain, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Hippocampus, Humans, Learning, Memory, Memory Disorders, Memory, Short-Term, Models, Neurological, Retention, Psychology, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review