Cited by 107Social Media and PoliticsHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionDigital Communication and Language

The impacts of identity verification and disclosure of social cues on flaming in online user comments

Cho, Daegon, Kwon, K. Hazel·2015·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.046

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cho, D., & Kwon, K. H.
Affiliations
  • Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Cho, Daegon
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
51
Pages
363-372
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W423846274
Cited by
107
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
28.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
Keywords
flaming, online anonymity, identity verification, online comments, transaction costs, moderates, South Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review