The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structuring peer assessment: Comparing the impact of the degree of structure on peer feedback content
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Peer feedback on wikis, for example, was shown to facilitate the improvement of writing essays and peer feedback content quality (Al Abri etal., 2021; Gielen & De Wever, 2015; Xiao & Lucking, 2008).”
From Online peer feedback in higher education: A synthesis of the literature (2024) · cites this paper as Gielen & De Wever, 2015
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The selected studies on online peer feedback have identified comprehension outcomes such as conceptual understanding, elaboration (Gielen & De Wever, 2015), and ability to justify (Zhan, 2020).”
From Online peer feedback in higher education: A synthesis of the literature (2024) · cites this paper as Gielen & De Wever, 2015
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Peer feedback activities in asynchronous discussion environments were found to promote students' conceptual understanding, while structured peer assessment was shown to improve the quality and focus of peer feedback elaborations (Gielen”
From Online peer feedback in higher education: A synthesis of the literature (2024) · cites this paper as Gielen & De Wever, 2015
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Peer feedback activities in asynchronous discussion environments were found to promote students' conceptual understanding, while structured peer assessment was shown to improve the quality and focus of peer feedback elaborations (Gielen”
From Online peer feedback in higher education: A synthesis of the literature (2024) · cites this paper as Gielen & De Wever, 2015
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Gielen and De Wever (2015) contend that peer assessment becomes significantly more effective when peer feedback is scripted.”
From The Exam Autopsy: An Integrated Post-Exam Assessment Model (2019) · cites this paper as Gielen and De Wever (2015)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“They collected data from 168 first-year undergraduate students who completed a wiki assignment in three cycles of three weeks each.”
From The Exam Autopsy: An Integrated Post-Exam Assessment Model (2019) · cites this paper as Gielen & De Wever, 2015
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“This study also confirms earlier findings that practice is an important component in peer assessment implementations (Gielen and De Wever 2015; Liu and Carless 2006).”
From Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: its effects on peer feedback quality and evolution in students’ perceptions about peer assessment skills (2018) · cites this paper as Gielen and De Wever 2015
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905
Hapeman, D. E., & Agresti, A. (1991) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1991.10484817 · Cited by 9,407
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152 · cited 4×
“Inspired by a large body of research (Shute, 2008; Strijbos, et al., 2012; Kulhavy & Wager, 1993; Van den Berg, et al., 2003; Cho & McArthur, 2010; Black & William, 1998; Kluger & Denisi, 1996), this study opted to distinguish elaborations between using informative and suggestive elaborations to…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
Shute, V. J. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307313795 · Cited by 4,631
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment
Biggs, J. (1996) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/bf00138871 · Cited by 4,084
Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410609519 · Cited by 2,744
Client-Centered Therapy: Its Current Practice, Implications and Theory
Rogers, C. R. (1951) · Cited by 2,416
Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment
Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. A. (2013) · Cited by 2,402
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Sluijsmans, D. (2002). Student involvement in assessment: The training of peer assessment skills, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen (unpublished doctoral dissertation).
- Strijbos, J. W., Van Goozen, B., & Prins, F. (2012, August). Developing a coding scheme for analysing peer feedback messages. In Paper presented at the EARLI-SIG 1 assessment and evaluation conference, Brussels, Belgium.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chen, J., Wang, M., Kirschner, P. A., & Tsai, C. (2018) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654318791584 · Cited by 490
Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., & Schellens, T. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0339-8 · Cited by 126
Usher, M., & Barak, M. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1405238 · Cited by 129
Online peer feedback in higher education: A synthesis of the literature
Kerman, N. T., Banihashem, S. K., Karami, M., Er, E., van Ginkel, S., & Noroozi, O. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12273-8 · Cited by 109
Huang, C., Tu, Y., Han, Z., Jiang, F., Wu, F. Q., & Jiang, Y. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104910 · Cited by 105
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101897 · Cited by 83
Effects of digital video-based feedback environments on pre-service teachers’ feedback competence
Prilop, C. N., Weber, K. E., & Kleinknecht, M. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.011 · Cited by 90
Usher, M. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2487495 · Cited by 114
Challenges of Student Equity and Engagement in a HyFlex Course
Binnewies, S., & Wang, Z. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-6982-7_12 · Cited by 75
Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Biemans, H. J. A., Smits, M., Vervoort, M. T. W., & Verbaan, C.-L. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11683-y · Cited by 83
What aspects of online peer feedback robustly predict growth in students' task performance?
Zong, Z., Schunn, C. D., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106924 · Cited by 61
Hwang, G.-J., Zou, D., & Wu, Y. (2023) · Educational technology research and development · doi:10.1007/s11423-022-10184-y · Cited by 55
Jacobsen, L. J., & Weber, K. E. (2025) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai6020035 · Cited by 58
A systematic review of the key components of online peer feedback practices in higher education
Gao, X., Noroozi, O., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H. J. A., & Banihashem, S. K. (2024) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100588 · Cited by 61
Jacobsen, L. J., & Weber, K. E. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/cr257 · Cited by 57
Hwang, G., & Chang, S. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13001 · Cited by 57
From plans to actions: A process model for why feedback features influence feedback implementation
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2021) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-021-09546-5 · Cited by 65
Outcomes of Introducing Early Learners to Interprofessional Competencies in a Classroom Setting
Lockeman, K. S., Lanning, S. K., Dow, A. W., Zorek, J. A., DiazGranados, D., Ivey, C. K., & Soper, S. (2017) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1080/10401334.2017.1296361 · Cited by 55
Hämäläinen, R., Wever, B. D., Nissinen, K. J., & Cincinnato, S. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.013 · Cited by 51
Haro, A. V., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Banihashem, S. K. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2215822 · Cited by 67
Connecting feedback to self-efficacy: Receiving and providing peer feedback in teacher education
Prilop, C. N., Weber, K. E., Prins, F. J., & Kleinknecht, M. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101062 · Cited by 57
Lee, Y.-F., Lin, C.-J., Hwang, G., Fu, Q.-K., & Tseng, W.-H. (2021) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1916763 · Cited by 47
Alemdağ, E., & Yıldırım, Z. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104574 · Cited by 51
The Effect of Peer Assessment on the Evaluation Process of Students
Alzaid, J. M. (2017) · International Education Studies · doi:10.5539/ies.v10n6p159 · Cited by 44
Scaffolding peer-assessment skills: Risk of interference with learning domain-specific skills?
Könings, K. D., van Zundert, M. J., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.11.007 · Cited by 46
Leveraging social networks in the adoption of mobile technologies for collaboration
Reychav, I., Ndicu, M. J., & Wu, D. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.011 · Cited by 39
Exploration of a group assessment model to foster student teachers’ critical thinking
Zhang, S., Li, H., Wen, Y., Zhang, Y., Guo, T., & He, X. (2023) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101239 · Cited by 39
Providing Formative Peer Feedback
Panadero, E., Jönsson, A., & Alqassab, M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316832134.020 · Cited by 41
Geng, X., & Su, Y.-S. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105211 · Cited by 43
Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., Schellens, T., & Raes, A. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0329-x · Cited by 38
Accounting students’ experiences of peer assessment: A tool to develop lifelong learning
Malan, M., & Stegmann, N. (2018) · South African Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1080/10291954.2018.1487503 · Cited by 27
Bartholomew, S. R., Zhang, L., Bravo, E. G., & Strimel, G. (2019) · The Design Journal · doi:10.1080/14606925.2018.1560876 · Cited by 27
Dmoshinskaia, N., Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2020) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-020-09884-y · Cited by 28
Bong, J. Y., & Park, M. S. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1727413 · Cited by 24
Geng, X., Zhan, Y., You, H., & Zhao, L. (2024) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101553 · Cited by 23
Weber, K. E., Prilop, C. N., & Kleinknecht, M. (2019) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100318 · Cited by 23
Prilop, C. N., & Weber, K. E. (2023) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2023.104099 · Cited by 26
Barahona, C., Nussbaum, M., Martín, V., Meneses, A., Arriagada, S., Serio, Á. D., & Hilliger, I. (2022) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-022-10173-1 · Cited by 28
The effects of gender and training on peer feedback characteristics
Ocampo, J. C. G., Panadero, E., Zamorano, D., Sánchez‐Iglesias, I., & Díez, F. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2286432 · Cited by 25
Learning by evaluating (LbE) through adaptive comparative judgment
Bartholomew, S. R., Mentzer, N., Jones, M., Sherman, D., & Baniya, S. (2020) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-020-09639-1 · Cited by 20
Students’ Perception of Peer Review in an EFL Classroom
Harutyunyan, L., & de Brusa, M. F. P. (2011) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v11n4p138 · Cited by 19
Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis
Hornstein, J., Keller, M. V., Greisel, M., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10017-3 · Cited by 18
“…messages can be measured using various criteria (e.g., coding according to correctness and usefulness of feedback; Dmoshinskaia et al., 2021; category system with “peer-feedback style,” “verification type,” “verification focus,” “elaboration type,” “elaboration focus”; M. Gielen & De Wever, 2015).”
Noroozi, O., & Wever, B. D. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2 · Cited by 23
Schee, B. A. V., & Birrittella, T. D. (2021) · Marketing Education Review · doi:10.1080/10528008.2021.1887746 · Cited by 18
A Qualitative Analysis on the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Team-Based Learning
Lerchenfeldt, S., Kamel-ElSayed, S. A., Patiño, G. A., Loftus, S., & Thomas, D. M. (2023) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-023-01813-z · Cited by 17
Video-Based Feedback for Collaborative Reflection among Mentors, University Tutors and Students
Liesa, E., Mayoral, P., Giralt-Romeu, M., & Angulo, S. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13090879 · Cited by 17
Lahza, H. F., Demartini, G., Noroozi, O., Gašević, D., Sadiq, S., & Khosravi, H. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105260 · Cited by 16
Billingsley, W. H., Torbay, R., Fletcher, P., Thomas, R. N., Steel, J. R. H., & Süß, J. G. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3218284 · Cited by 16
Zhang, Y., Schunn, C. D., & Wu, Y. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101411 · Cited by 15
Effects of the visual analytics of peer feedback on teachers’ TPACK development in a lesson study
Wang, A., Yu, S., Wang, M., & Chen, L. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2204354 · Cited by 14
Morawski, M., & Budke, A. (2019) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci9030178 · Cited by 17
Peer Review: A Tool to Enhance the Quality of Academic Written Productions
de Brusa, M. F. P., & Harutyunyan, L. (2019) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v12n5p30 · Cited by 13
The effects of teacher’ feedback
Rochera, M. J., Engel, A., & Salvador, C. C. (2021) · Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED) · doi:10.6018/red.476901 · Cited by 12
Xiong, Y., Schunn, C. D., & Wu, Y. (2023) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12861 · Cited by 13
AI assistance in peer feedback provision: Pedagogically sound, but minimally adopted
Pozdniakov, S., Brazil, J., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., Gašević, D., Sadiq, S., & Khosravi, H. (2026) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105591 · Cited by 11
University Students’ Perceptions of Peer Assessment in Oral Presentations
Zahinos, D. G., Sánchez, M. J. F., Tráver, M. T. B., & Herrera, S. S. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14030221 · Cited by 17
The Exam Autopsy: An Integrated Post-Exam Assessment Model
Owen, L. R. (2019) · International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2019.130104 · Cited by 9
Wang, A., Yu, S.-Q., Wang, M.-H., Wu, L., Wang, D., & Huang, L. (2023) · System (Linköping) · doi:10.1016/j.system.2023.103055 · Cited by 10
Mentzer, N., Lee, W., Jackson, A., & Bartholomew, S. R. (2023) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-023-09853-7 · Cited by 13
Kristanto, Y. D. (2018) · REID (Research and Evaluation in Education) · doi:10.21831/reid.v4i2.20951 · Cited by 9
van Blankenstein, F. M., O’Sullivan, J., Saab, N., & Paul Steendijk, A. (2021) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02755-z · Cited by 10
Xie, Q., & Chang, Z. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105167 · Cited by 11
Consistency in providing peer feedback: the role of individual and situational factors
Gao, X., Schunn, C. D., Noroozi, O., Gulikers, J. T. M., Banihashem, S. K., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2517617 · Cited by 9
Augmenting Assessment with Learning Analytics
Knight, S. (2020) · The enabling power of assessment · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41956-1_10 · Cited by 9
Contreras, N., Liesa, E., Mayoral, P., & de Nicolás, M. A. (2025) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2025.2514638 · Cited by 7
Students experiences of peer-support during a Master’s thesis process
Kaakinen, P., Suhonen, M., Lutovac, S., & Kaasila, R. (2017) · Clinical Nursing Studies · doi:10.5430/cns.v5n1p22 · Cited by 7
van Blankenstein, F. V., Truțescu, G.-O., van der Rijst, R. M., & Saab, N. (2019) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-019-09482-5
Computerunterstütztes kollaboratives Lernen
Vogel, F., & Fischer, F. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-54368-9_3 · Cited by 9
Formative Feedback For Improved Student Performance Through Adaptive Comparative Judgment
Bartholomew, S. R., Strimel, G., Garcia, E., Yoshikawa, E., & Zhang, L. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--30531 · Cited by 6
Zhang, H., Costley, J., Courtney, M. G. R., Shulgina, G., & Fanguy, M. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13032-z · Cited by 6
Jakopovic, P. M., Lemke, J., Karpf, A., & Stamatis, K. M. (2023) · The Teacher Educator · doi:10.1080/08878730.2023.2270948 · Cited by 8
A comparison of preservice teacher perceptions of instructor video and text-based feedback
Kormos, E. (2022) · SN Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43545-022-00413-9 · Cited by 4
Ocampo, J. C. G., Panadero, E., Sánchez‐Iglesias, I., & Díez, F. (2025) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101455 · Cited by 4
Wang, A., Wu, L., & Wang, D. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt52272.2021.00041 · Cited by 4
Using cross-course peer grading with content expertise, anonymity, and perceived justice
Schee, B. A. V., Stovall, T., & Andrews, D. (2022) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/14697874221096751 · Cited by 4
Chen, H.-L., & Liu, C. (2023) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-023-00856-8 · Cited by 4
Rifah, L., & Sabilah, F. (2022) · Journal on English as a Foreign Language · doi:10.23971/jefl.v12i1.3113 · Cited by 3
Sentiment analysis of peer feedback in higher education
Pinargote-Ortega, M., Bowen-Mendoza, L. E., Meza, J., & Ventura, S. (2024) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0187956 · Cited by 3
Evaluating the impact of transparency on peer review quality in MOOCs
Perdue, M., & Sandland, J. G. (2022) · IEEE Learning With MOOCS (LWMOOCS) · doi:10.1109/lwmoocs53067.2022.9928020 · Cited by 3
Sentiment Analysis Techniques for Peer Feedback: A Review
Pinargote-Ortega, M., Bowen-Mendoza, L. E., Meza, J., & Ventura, S. (2023) · International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment · doi:10.1109/icedeg58167.2023.10122085 · Cited by 3
Support Student Integration of Multiple Peer Feedback on Research Writing in Thesis Circles
Hsiao, Y. P., & Rajagopal, K. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_3 · Cited by 4
Kooperationsskripts beim technologieunterstützten Lernen
Kiemer, K., Wekerle, C., & Kollar, I. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-54368-9_29 · Cited by 3
Computerunterstütztes kollaboratives Lernen
Vogel, F., & Fischer, F. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_3-1 · Cited by 3
Fostering argumentation with online learning systems in higher education
Haro, A. V. (2022) · doi:10.18174/569585 · Cited by 4
Hornstein, J., Greisel, M., & Kollar, I. (2025) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-025-09745-4 · Cited by 5
Enabling Peer Feedback in Teacher Education: The Use of Virtual Reality-Based Microteaching
Jacobsen, L. J., Weber, K. E., Prilop, C. N., Huang, Y., Geske, A., & Richter, E. (2025) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331251390698 · Cited by 6
Using Sentiment Analysis to Investigate Peer Feedback by Native and Non-Native English Speakers
Exline, B., Duffin, M., Harbison, B., da Gomez, C., & Joyner, D. A. (2025) · ACM Global Computing Education Conference (CompEd) · doi:10.1145/3736181.3747156 · Cited by 2
Leveraging Epistemic Network Analysis to Understand Peer Feedback in Online Courses
Siggard, R. R., & Lundgren, L. M. (2024) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-024-10165-1 · Cited by 2
The Use of Peer Assessment as an Inclusive Learning Strategy in Higher Education Institutions
Meletiadou, E. (2021) · Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-8579-5.ch001 · Cited by 2
The Promotion of Self-Regulated Learning Through Peer Feedback in Initial Teacher Education
García, E. C., & Seguí, L. P. (2020) · International Journal of Technology-Enabled Student Support Services · doi:10.4018/ijtesss.2020010101 · Cited by 2
Adaptive Comparative Judgment and Psychological Safety in Accounting Education
Bartholomew, S. R., Jones, M. D., Hawkins, S. R., & Orton, J. (2021) · Journal of Education and Training · doi:10.5296/jet.v9i1.19046 · Cited by 2
Marion, C., Laferrière, T., & Tremblay-Gagnon, D. (2022) · Revue internationale du CRIRES innover dans la tradition de Vygotsky · doi:10.51657/ric.v6i1.51446 · Cited by 7
Opio-Göres, M., Kollar, I., & Dorner, B. (2025) · Social Work Education · doi:10.1080/02615479.2024.2443493 · Cited by 1
Ocampo, J. C. G., Panadero, E., Zamorano, D., & Sánchez‐Iglesias, I. (2025) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2025.100987 · Cited by 1
de Oliveira, T., Stringhini, D., Craibas, J. J. S., & Corrêa, D. G. M. (2019) · RENOTE · doi:10.22456/1679-1916.95702 · Cited by 1
Liao, R.-Y., Chang, C.-T., & Chen, C.-Y. (2020) · International Research in Education · doi:10.5296/ire.v8i2.17405 · Cited by 1
Exploring the impact of the rubric on peer feedback content quality in online learning
Li, X., Zhou, X., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · International Conference on Distance Education and Learning (ICDEL) · doi:10.1145/3543321.3543344 · Cited by 1
Louwerse, J., Sprokkereef, D., & Rozendaal, J. (2024) · Tijdschrift OnderwijsPraktijk Studies · doi:10.54657/tops.13409 · Cited by 1
Learning by evaluating as an interview primer to inform design thinking
Thorne, S., Mentzer, N., Bartholomew, S. R., Strimel, G., & Ware, J. (2024) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-024-09933-2 · Cited by 1
Kooperationsskripts beim technologieunterstützten Lernen
Kiemer, K., Wekerle, C., & Kollar, I. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_29-1 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Gielen, M., & De Wever, B.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Gielen, Mario
- ORCID
- De Wever, Bram
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 52
- Pages
- 315-325
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W564614949
- Semantic Scholar
- 2b3df5d809754895451651688f22d4faf40099f0
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 24.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Ghent University (BOF11/STA/026)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- peer assessment, peer feedback, wiki-based learning, higher education, elaboration, verification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
