What aspects of online peer feedback robustly predict growth in students' task performance?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a strong association between feedback quality and comment length.
“previous research has found a strong association between feedback quality and comment length Zong et al. (2021).”
From Impact of AI assistance on student agency (2024) · cites this paper as Zong et al. (2021)
Cites
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · see citing works
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564 · cited 2× · see citing works
“rapid progress (Ericsson, 2004; Ericsson et al., 1993)? Third, theories need to be expanded to account for variation in quantitative and qualitative variation in effect sizes.”
BackgroundNicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846 · see citing works
How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?
Thompson, S. G., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1187 · Cited by 3,026 · see citing works
Ericsson, K. A. (2004) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022 · Cited by 2,988 · cited 2× · see citing works
“rapid progress (Ericsson, 2004; Ericsson et al., 1993)? Third, theories need to be expanded to account for variation in quantitative and qualitative variation in effect sizes.”
BackgroundThe ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.965823 · Cited by 2,911 · see citing works
Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities
Topping, K. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170598 · Cited by 2,173 · see citing works
Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it
Barnett, A. G. (2004) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyh299 · Cited by 1,988 · see citing works
Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses.
Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000098 · Cited by 1,162 · see citing works
A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random‐effects meta‐analyses
Langan, D., Higgins, J. P. T., Jackson, D., Bowden, J., Veroniki, A. A., Kontopantelis, E., Viechtbauer, W., & Simmonds, M. (2019) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1316 · Cited by 1,074 · see citing works
Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N. (2018) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617739704 · Cited by 1,040 · see citing works
Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033546 · Cited by 1,007 · see citing works
Harbord, R. M., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2008) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0800800403 · Cited by 897 · see citing works
Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory
Chen, K., & Jang, S. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.011 · Cited by 860 · see citing works
To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002 · Cited by 843 · see citing works
Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004 · Cited by 712 · see citing works
Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307309920 · Cited by 647 · see citing works
Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007 · Cited by 615 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In terms of underlying mechanisms for the benefit of receiving peer feedback, any form of feedback that has been received can provide an important learning opportunity (Gielen et al., 2010), particularly when students act on the feedback they receive (Wu & Schunn, 2021).”
BackgroundThe nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance
Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Self-citationInnovative Assessment in Higher Education
Nicol, D., & Milligan, C. (2006) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203969670 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system
Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2005) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Self-citationShabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v3n4p237 · Cited by 458 · see citing works
The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies
Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3 · Cited by 446 · see citing works
Improving Measurements of Self-Regulated Learning
Winne, P. H. (2010) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2010.517150 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Feedback Strategies for Interactive Learning Tasks
Narciss, S. (2007) · doi:10.4324/9780203880869.ch11 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis
Li, H., Xiong, Y., Hunter, C. V., Guo, X., & Tywoniw, R. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: their origin and impact on revision work
Kaufman, J. H., & Schunn, C. D. (2010) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9133-6 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Self-citationHuisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
An Overview of the World of MOOCs
Baturay, M. H. (2015) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Huisman, B., Saab, N., van den Broek, P., & van Driel, J. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Marsh, H. W., Jayasinghe, U. W., & Bond, N. W. (2008) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.63.3.160 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course
Tseng, S.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.007 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Online peer assessment: effects of cognitive and affective feedback
Lu, J., & Law, N. W. Y. (2011) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9177-2 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider
van Popta, E., Kral, M., Camp, G., Martens, R. L., & Simons, P. R.-J. (2017) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.10.003 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.010 · Cited by 259 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…peer review has been broadly shown to improve student learning outcomes (Wright & Jenkins-Guarnieri, 2012; Double et al., 2019; Huisman et al., 2019; Li et al., 2020), as well as supporting social-affective development and metacognitive awareness (Sluijsmans et al., 2001; van Gennip et al., 2010).”
BackgroundCho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2011) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021950 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Panadero, E., & Alqassab, M. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186 · Cited by 232 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…aspects of peer review in instruction have exploded (Double et al., 2019), resulting in several recent systematic reviews (van Popta et al., 2017; Panadero & Alqassab, 2019) and meta-analyses (e.g., Wright & Jenkins-Guarnieri, 2012; Huisman et al., 2019; Double et al., 2019; Li et al., 2020),…”
BackgroundStudent perspectives on formative peer assessment: an attempt to deepen learning?
Vickerman, P. (2008) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930801955986 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments
Strijbos, J.-W., & Sluijsmans, D. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.002 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Peer assessment in the digital age: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratings
Li, H., Xiong, Y., Zang, X., Kornhaber, M. L., Lyu, Y., Chung, K. S., & Suen, H. K. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.999746 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Explanation feedback is better than correct answer feedback for promoting transfer of learning.
Butler, A. C., Godbole, N. R., & Marsh, E. J. (2012) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031026 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Correnti, R. J. (2016) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000103 · Cited by 165 · cited 11× · see citing works
“Document submission, peer reviewing, comment quality evaluation, and demographic data collection were all managed by the widely-used online peer reviewing system called SWoRD/Peerceptiv (Cho & Schunn, 2007; Patchan et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationPeer assessment in problem based learning
Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Moerkerke, G., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Dochy, F. J. R. C. (2001) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/s0191-491x(01)00019-0 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2020) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831220945266 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Self-citationCurran, V. R., Gustafson, D. L., Simmons, K. P., Lannon, H., Wang, C., Garmsiri, M., Fleet, L. J., & Wetsch, L. R. (2019) · Journal of Adult and Continuing Education · doi:10.1177/1477971419827318 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
An L2 writing group: Task and social dimensions
Nelson, G. L., & Murphy, J. M. (1992) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(92)90002-7 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
From feedback to revisions: Effects of feedback features and perceptions
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2019) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101826 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Self-citationNicol, D., & Milligan, C. D. (2006) · doi:10.4324/9780203969670-16 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.019 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Clark, R. J. (2018) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1320374 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Self-citationGiving or receiving feedback: which is more beneficial to students’ learning?
Ion, G., Martí, A. S., & Morell, I. A. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1484881 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Effect of teacher modeling and feedback on EFL students’ peer review skills in peer review training
Min, H. (2016) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.004 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback
Misiejuk, K., Wasson, B., & Egelandsdal, K. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106658 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Wright, S. L., & Jenkins‐Guarnieri, M. A. (2011) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.563279 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Peer Feedback in Learning English Writing: Advantages and Disadvantages
Bijami, M., Kashef, S. H., & Sharafi-Nejad, M. (2013) · Journal of Studies in Education · doi:10.5296/jse.v3i4.4314 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
The Reliability and Validity of Peer Review of Writing in High School AP English Classes.
Schunn, C. D., Godley, A., & Martino, S. D. (2016) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.525 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citationWu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101897 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationThe role of technology-facilitated peer assessment and supporting strategies: a meta-analysis
Zheng, L., Zhang, X., & Cui, P. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1644603 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Teacher and student race as a predictor for negative feedback during instruction.
Scott, T. M., Gage, N. A., Hirn, R. G., & Han, H. (2018) · School Psychology · doi:10.1037/spq0000251 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Student attitudes that predict participation in peer assessment
Zou, Y., Schunn, C. D., Wang, Y., & Zhang, F. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1409872 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationAutomated Assessment of the Quality of Peer Reviews using Natural Language Processing Techniques
Ramachandran, L., Gehringer, E. F., & Yadav, R. K. (2017) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0132-x · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Curran, F. C., Fisher, B. W., Viano, S. L., & Kupchik, A. (2019) · American Journal of Education · doi:10.1086/705499 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Wichmann, A., Funk, A., & Rummel, N. (2017) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0348-7 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Nguyen, H. V., Xiong, W., & Litman, D. J. (2017) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0136-6 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Tsivitanidou, O., Constantinou, C. P., Labudde, P., Rönnebeck, S., & Ropohl, M. (2017) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0341-1 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Leijen, D. A. J., & Leontjeva, A. (2012) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2012.04.02.4 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Davey, K. R. (2011) · Education for Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.ece.2011.08.004 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Philippakos, Z. A. T., MacArthur, C. A., & Munsell, S. (2018) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.897 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Zhang, F., Schunn, C. D., & Baikadi, A. (2017) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-017-9420-6
Self-citationDeiglmayr, A. (2017) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0355-8
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Impact of AI assistance on student agency
Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., Gašević, D., & Siemens, G. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104967 · Cited by 548 · see citing works
“While longer comments do not guarantee higher quality, research suggests a positive association between feedback quality and comment length (Zong et al., 2021).”
BackgroundGuo, K., Pan, M., Li, Y., & Lai, C. (2024) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100962 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Incorporating <scp>AI</scp> and learning analytics to build trustworthy peer assessment systems
Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13233 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Peer feedback to support collaborative knowledge improvement: What kind of feedback feed-forward?
Tan, J. S. H., & Chen, W. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104467 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
EFL student engagement with giving peer feedback in academic writing: A longitudinal study
Zhang, F., Schunn, C., Chen, S., Li, W., & Li, R. (2023) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101255 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationA systematic review of the key components of online peer feedback practices in higher education
Gao, X., Noroozi, O., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H. J. A., & Banihashem, S. K. (2024) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100588 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Understanding the what and when of peer feedback benefits for performance and transfer
Yu, Q., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107857 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationAlemdağ, E., & Yıldırım, Z. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104574 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Online self‐regulated learning and academic procrastination: A moderated mediation model
Ma, M., Li, M., Wang, Q., Qiu, A., & Wang, T. (2022) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22730 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Teacher, peer, or AI? Comparing effects of feedback sources in higher education
Weidlich, J., Gotsch, F., Schudel, K., Marusic-Würscher, C., Mazzarella, J., Bolten, H., Bütler, D., Luger, S., Wohlfender, B., & Merki, K. M. (2025) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100300 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Bellhäuser, H., Liborius, P., & Schmitz, B. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813381 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Schunn, C. D., & Wu, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00458-1 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationMolins, L. L., & Cano, E. (2023) · Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research · doi:10.7821/naer.2023.1.1127 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Tran, T. Y., & Ma, Q. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101418 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Zong, Z., Schunn, C. D., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1968792 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationZhang, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102210 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationStudent perceptions of feedback in reciprocal or nonreciprocal peer tutoring or mentoring
Byl, E., & Topping, K. J. (2023) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101304 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Xiong, Y., Schunn, C. D., & Wu, Y. (2023) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12861 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationTan, J. S. H., Chen, W., Su, J., & Su, G. (2023) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-023-09390-4 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
When do students provide more peer feedback? The roles of performance and prior feedback experiences
Zong, Z., Schunn, C. D., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-023-09640-w · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationThe good, bad, and ugly of comment prompts: Effects on length and helpfulness of peer feedback
Mu, H., & Schunn, C. D. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00502-8 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationLiao, M., Zhu, K., & Wang, G. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1288503 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Shulgina, G., Fanguy, M., Zhang, H., Courtney, M. G. R., Baldwin, M., & Costley, J. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105104 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Xiaomeng, Z., & Ravindran, L. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101422 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Sedrakyan, G., Borsci, S., Abdi, A., van den Berg, S. M., Veldkamp, B. P., & van Hillegersberg, J. (2023) · Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning · doi:10.1108/jrit-02-2023-0014 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Schunn, C. D., & Wu, Y. (2025) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102397 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationSedrakyan, G., van den Berg, S. M., Veldkamp, B. P., & van Hillegersberg, J. (2023) · International Journal of Information and Education Technology · doi:10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.5.1867 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Zong, Z., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-023-09401-4 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, W., Lyu, Q., & Su, J. (2024) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-024-09667-7 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Lai, C., Pan, M., Guo, K., & Cui, Y. (2026) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105675 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The role of platform design in online peer feedback: a comparison of two digital environments
Jongsma, M. V., Meeter, M., van Muijlwijk‐Koezen, J. E., & Scholten, D. J. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13598-2 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Gorham, T., Majumdar, R., & Ogata, H. (2025) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-025-00387-0 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Hua, C. (2023) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688231195143 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Li, C., Chen, Y., Zhou, S., Shi, J., Yang, S., & Li, M. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16229657 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Özbek, T., Daumiller, M. H., Roshany-Tabrizi, A., Mömke, T., & Kollar, I. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100540 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The effect of web-based peer feedback on students’ writing achievement
Acarol, K. (2024) · Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning · doi:10.31681/jetol.1314382 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Marion, C., Laferrière, T., & Tremblay-Gagnon, D. (2022) · Revue internationale du CRIRES innover dans la tradition de Vygotsky · doi:10.51657/ric.v6i1.51446 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Deng, W., & Wang, L. (2023) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v18i08.39243 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Unfolding the Network of Peer Grades: A Latent Variable Approach
Mignemi, G., Chen, Y., & Moustaki, I. (2025) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1017/psy.2025.10021 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Liu, H., Zong, Z., & Feng, Y. (2025) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105494 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationSantos, A. C., Torres, A. C., Nobre, A., & Mouraz, A. (2025) · International Journal of School & Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/21683603.2025.2567885 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Academic ability generates better quality feedback: Evidence from PeerWise assessments
Huang, W., Stephens, J. M., & Brown, G. (2026) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101566 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Zong, Z., & Schunn, C. D. (2025) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104825 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationSomasse, G. B., & Wrobel, M. (2024) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--44302
Statistical Analysis of Peer Grading: A Latent Variable Approach
Mignemi, G., Chen, Y., & Moustaki, I. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-64447-4_45
La Retroalimentación por Pares a través del Diálogo Vista por el Alumnado
García, C. C., Campos, M. D. G., & García, L. M. (2024) · Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa · doi:10.15366/riee2024.17.2.003
Bellini, C. G. P., Serpa, M. L., & Pereira, R. D. C. D. F. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15040511 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Cheong, C. M., Zhu, X., & Lu, Q. (2025) · ECNU Review of Education · doi:10.1177/20965311251346498
Malott, K. M., Wahesh, E., Haley, A. S., Havlik, S. A., & McClatchy, L. (2025) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-025-09836-7
Urbanek, M. T., Vinton, D., & Moon, A. C. (2025) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/d5rp00118h
Shulgina, G., Адамович, К., Zhang, H., Fanguy, M., Baldwin, M., & Costley, J. (2025) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/14697874251389104
Enhancing online mathematics learning through self-regulated and peer-support strategies
Abdulrahman, A. A., Husain, S. K. S., Letchumanan, M., Yunos, F., & Osman, S. B. (2026) · STEM Education · doi:10.3934/steme.2026018
Zhang, E., Zhang, Z., Li, X., Li, J., & Liu, H. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70288
Yang, J., & Schunn, C. D. (2026) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-026-09813-3
Self-citationSuhartoyo, E., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Hamat, A., Ismiatun, F., Afrilyasanti, R., & Ubaidillah, M. F. (2026) · Multidisciplinary Science Journal · doi:10.31893/multiscience.2026808
What have researchers examined? Capturing the conceptual diversity of peer feedback quality measures
Zhang, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2026) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101642
Self-citationAccept, elaborate, modify, or no uptake?: Which peer feedback features matter?
Gao, X., Schunn, C. D., Gulikers, J. T. M., Banihashem, S. K., Biemans, H. J. A., & Noroozi, O. (2026) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2026.102491
Self-citationPeer feedback quality matters for post-feedback outcomes: A meta-analysis
Alemdağ, E., Lipnevich, A. A., Bardach, L., & Lindner, M. A. (2026) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2026.100848
Pinto, D., Freires, T., Carvalho, A. E., & Torres, A. C. (2026) · Cognitive technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-0658-2_5
- Authors
- Zong, Z., Schunn, C. D., & Wang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schunn, Christian D.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 124
- Pages
- 106924
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3176997313
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 12.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- online peer feedback, peer comments, comment quality, learning outcomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
