Presentation, expectations, and experience: Sources of student perceptions of automated writing evaluation

A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · Cited by 23,066 · see citing works

The Power of Feedback

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · see citing works

The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods

Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x09351676 · Cited by 5,774 · see citing works

Focus on Formative Feedback

Shute, V. J. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307313795 · Cited by 4,631 · see citing works

What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013) · Journal of Education · doi:10.1177/002205741319300303 · Cited by 2,790 · see citing works

Mindsets That Promote Resilience: When Students Believe That Personal Characteristics Can Be Developed

Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.722805 · Cited by 2,334 · see citing works

Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration

Ertmer, P. A. (1999) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02299597 · Cited by 2,189 · see citing works

Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001 · Cited by 2,107 · see citing works

What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009) · Cited by 1,690 · see citing works

A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445 · Cited by 1,609 · see citing works

Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis

(2007) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203936399 · Cited by 1,571 · see citing works

Technological pedagogical content knowledge – a review of the literature

Voogt, J. M., Fisser, P., Roblin, N. P., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2012) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x · Cited by 1,103 · see citing works

Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix

McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., McCarthy, P. M., & Cai, Z. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511894664 · Cited by 898 · see citing works

Modeling and remodeling writing

Hayes, J. R. (2012) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088312451260 · Cited by 893 · see citing works

The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review

Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002 · Cited by 839 · see citing works

Automatically Assessing Lexical Sophistication: Indices, Tools, Findings, and Application

Kyle, K. D., & Crossley, S. A. (2014) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.194 · Cited by 562 · see citing works

Handbook of Automated Essay Evaluation

(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203122761 · Cited by 491 · see citing works

Analyzing Revision

Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981) · College Composition & Communication · doi:10.2307/356602 · Cited by 481 · see citing works

Best practices in writing instruction

(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-2158 · Cited by 462 · see citing works

Responding to Student Writing

Sommers, N. I. (1982) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357622 · Cited by 445 · see citing works

Untitled work

(2006) · The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment (Boston College) · Cited by 424 · see citing works

Coherence, Cohesion, and Writing Quality

Witte, S. P., & Faigley, L. L. (1981) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/356693 · Cited by 420 · see citing works

Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?

Strijbos, J.-W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008 · Cited by 369 · see citing works

Uncovering the Problem-Solving Process: Cued Retrospective Reporting Versus Concurrent and Retrospective Reporting.

van Gog, T., PAAS, F. G. W. C., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Witte, P. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.11.4.237 · Cited by 359 · see citing works

Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: their origin and impact on revision work

Kaufman, J. H., & Schunn, C. D. (2010) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9133-6 · Cited by 335 · see citing works

Rethinking the role of automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback in ESL writing instruction

Li, J., Link, S., & Hegelheimer, V. H. (2014) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2014.10.004 · Cited by 327 · see citing works

Feedback Interventions

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. S. (1998) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772989 · Cited by 314 · see citing works

The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion

Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2015) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0651-7 · Cited by 313 · see citing works

The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing

Stevenson, M., & Phakiti, A. (2014) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.007 · Cited by 275 · see citing works

On the relation between automated essay scoring and modern views of the writing construct

Deane, P. (2012) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.002 · Cited by 274 · see citing works

Improving the writing skills of college students

Kellogg, R. T., & Raulerson, B. A. (2007) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03194058 · Cited by 270 · see citing works

Feedback to writing, assessment for teaching and learning and student progress

Parr, J. M., & Timperley, H. S. (2010) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.05.004 · Cited by 245 · see citing works

A hierarchical classification approach to automated essay scoring

McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., & Dai, J. (2014) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.09.002 · Cited by 243 · see citing works

Automated Writing Assessment in the Classroom

Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2008) · Pedagogies: An International Journal · doi:10.1080/15544800701771580 · Cited by 243 · see citing works

Utility in a Fallible Tool: A Multi-Site Case Study of Automated Writing Evaluation.

Grimes, D., & Warschauer, M. (2010) · The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment (Boston College) · Cited by 241 · see citing works

Small-Group Reflections: Parallels Between Teacher Discourse and Student Behavior in Peer-Directed Groups

Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., & Ing, M. (2006) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1501_8 · Cited by 232 · see citing works

Revising Strategies in Twelfth Grade Students’ Transactional Writing

Bridwell, L. S. (1980) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte198015795 · Cited by 228 · see citing works

State-of-the-art automated essay scoring: Competition, results, and future directions from a United States demonstration

Shermis, M. D. (2014) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.04.001 · Cited by 227 · see citing works

Natural language processing in an intelligent writing strategy tutoring system

McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & Roscoe, R. D. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0258-1 · Cited by 203 · see citing works

Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance.

Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/a0017841 · Cited by 199 · see citing works

The Development of Writing Proficiency as a Function of Grade Level: A Linguistic Analysis

Crossley, S. A., Weston, J. L., Sullivan, S. T. M., & McNamara, D. S. (2011) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088311410188 · Cited by 191 · see citing works

The debate on automated essay grading

Hearst, M. A. (2000) · IEEE Intelligent Systems and their Applications · doi:10.1109/5254.889104 · Cited by 176 · see citing works

Comparison of Human and Machine Scoring of Essays: Differences by Gender, Ethnicity, and Country

Bridgeman, B., Trapani, C. S., & Attali, Y. (2012) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1080/08957347.2012.635502 · Cited by 144 · see citing works

Writing pal: Feasibility of an intelligent writing strategy tutor in the high school classroom.

Roscoe, R. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2013) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0032340 · Cited by 144 · see citing works

Self-regulated strategy instruction in college developmental writing

MacArthur, C. A., Philippakos, Z. A., & Ianetta, M. (2015) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000011 · Cited by 135 · see citing works

The Writing Pal Intelligent Tutoring System: Usability Testing and Development

Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., Weston, J. L., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2014) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2014.09.002 · Cited by 123 · see citing works

Large-scale assessment, locally-developed measures, and automated scoring of essays: Fishing for red herrings?

Condon, W. (2012) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.11.001 · Cited by 113 · see citing works

L2 Writing Practice: Game Enjoyment as a Key to Engagement

Allen, L. K., Crossley, S. A., Snow, E. L., & McNamara, D. S. (2014) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44373 · Cited by 102 · see citing works

Motivating revision of drafts through formative feedback

McGarrell, H., & Verbeem, J. (2007) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/ccm030 · Cited by 102 · see citing works

Self-Regulated Strategy Development for Students With Writing Difficulties

Mason, L. H., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2011) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405841.2011.534922 · Cited by 100 · see citing works

Which do students prefer to evaluate their essays: peers or computer program

Lai, Y. (2010) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00959.x · Cited by 92 · see citing works

Does Automated Feedback Help Students Learn to Write?

Kellogg, R. T., Whiteford, A. P., & Quinlan, T. (2010) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.42.2.c · Cited by 88 · see citing works

The E-rater® Automated Essay Scoring System

Burstein, J. C., Tetreault, J., & Madnani, N. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203122761.ch4 · Cited by 57 · see citing works

Implementation and Applications of the Intelligent Essay Assessor

Foltz, P. W., Streeter, L. A., Lochbaum, K. E., & Landauer, T. K. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203122761.ch5 · Cited by 54 · see citing works

Implementation and Applications of the Intelligent Essay Assessor

Bridgeman, B. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203122761-13 · Cited by 47 · see citing works

Developing pedagogically-guided algorithms for intelligent writing feedback

Roscoe, R. D., Varner, L. K., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2013) · International Journal of Learning Technology · doi:10.1504/ijlt.2013.059131 · Cited by 40 · see citing works

Does Automated Feedback Improve Writing Quality

Wilson, J., Olinghouse, N. G., & Andrada, G. N. (2014) · Learning disabilities · Cited by 35 · see citing works

Analysis of Student Revisions on a State Writing Test

Crawford, L., Lloyd, S., & Knoth, K. (2008) · Assessment for Effective Intervention · doi:10.1177/1534508407311403 · Cited by 33 · see citing works

Discourse Coherence and LSA

Foltz, P. W. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203936399.ch9 · Cited by 32 · see citing works

Using Automatic Scoring Models to Detect Changes in Student Writing in an Intelligent Tutoring System

Crossley, S. A., Roscoe, R. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2013) · The Florida AI Research Society · Cited by 27 · see citing works

Automated Detection of Essay Revising Patterns: Applications for Intelligent Feedback in a Writing Tutor.

Roscoe, R. D., Snow, E. L., Allen, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2015) · Cited by 26 · see citing works

Partial Verbal Redundancy in Multimedia Presentations for Writing Strategy Instruction

Roscoe, R. D., Jacovina, M. E., Harry, D., Russell, D. G., & McNamara, D. S. (2015) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3149 · Cited by 24 · see citing works

Linguistic Features of Humor in Academic Writing

(2016) · Advances in Language and Literary Studies · doi:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.3p.248 · Cited by 9 · see citing works

STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF PROJECT ESSAY GRADE (PEG) SOFTWARE

(2013) · Issues in Information Systems · doi:10.48009/1_iis_2013_89-98 · Cited by 3 · see citing works

STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF PROJECT ESSAY GRADE (PEG) SOFTWARE

Curran, M., Draus, P. J., & Maruschock, G. R. (2013) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 3 · see citing works

FACULTY PERCEPTIONS OF PROJECT ESSAY GRADE (PEG) SOFTWARE

Curran, M. J., Maruschock, G. R., & Maier, T. (2014) · Issues in Information Systems · doi:10.48009/1_iis_2014_71-80 · Cited by 1 · see citing works

Chatting and Cheating. Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT

Cotton, D., Cotton, P., & Shipway, J. R. (2023) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/mrz8h · Cited by 3,079 · see citing works

Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148 · Cited by 3,087 · see citing works

AI-generated feedback on writing: insights into efficacy and ENL student preference

Escalante, J., Pack, A., & Barrett, A. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00425-2 · Cited by 589 · see citing works

Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing

Steiss, J., Tate, T., Graham, S., Cruz, J., Hebert, M., Wang, J., Moon, Y., Tseng, W., Warschauer, M., & Olson, C. B. (2024) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894 · Cited by 509 · see citing works

A systematic review of AI-based automated written feedback research

Shi, H., & Aryadoust, V. (2024) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344023000265 · Cited by 222 · see citing works

Educational Applications of the ChatGPT AI System: A Systematic Review Research

İPEK, Z. H., Gözüm, A. İ. C., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2023) · Educational Process International Journal · doi:10.22521/edupij.2023.123.2 · Cited by 209 · see citing works

Automated Writing Evaluation and Feedback: Multiple Metrics of Efficacy

Wilson, J., & Roscoe, R. D. (2020) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633119830764 · Cited by 176 · see citing works

A review of AWE feedback: types, learning outcomes, and implications

Fu, Q.-K., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Cheng, G. (2022) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2022.2033787 · Cited by 173 · see citing works

Effectiveness of automated writing evaluation systems in school settings: A systematic review of studies from 2000 to 2020

Nunes, A., Cordeiro, C., Limpo, T., & Castro, S. L. (2021) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12635 · Cited by 167 · see citing works

The Effectiveness of Automated Writing Evaluation on Writing Quality: A Meta-Analysis

Zhai, N., & Ma, X. (2022) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331221127300 · Cited by 169 · see citing works

Automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback: a systematic investigation of college students’ acceptance

Zhai, N., & Ma, X. (2021) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2021.1897019 · Cited by 113 · see citing works

How effectively can EFL students use automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) in research writing?

Guo, Q., Feng, R., & Hua, Y. (2021) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2021.1879161 · Cited by 112 · see citing works

Teacher implementation of Self-Regulated Strategy Development with an automated writing evaluation system: Effects on the argumentative writing performance of middle school students

Palermo, C., & Thomson, M. M. (2018) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.07.002 · Cited by 107 · see citing works

The impact of automated writing evaluation on second language writing skills of Chinese EFL learners: a randomized controlled trial

Wei, P., Wang, X., & Dong, H. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1249991 · Cited by 89 · see citing works

Examining EFL learners’ individual antecedents on the adoption of automated writing evaluation in China

Li, R., Meng, Z., Tian, M., Zhang, Z., Ni, C., & Wei, X. L. (2019) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1540433 · Cited by 87 · see citing works

Grading exams using large language models: A comparison between human and AI grading of exams in higher education using ChatGPT

Flodén, J. (2024) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.4069 · Cited by 110 · see citing works

Automated Essay Scoring and Revising Based on Open-Source Large Language Models

Song, Y., Zhu, Q., Wang, H., & Zheng, Q. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2024.3396873 · Cited by 82 · see citing works

eRevis(ing): Students’ revision of text evidence use in an automated writing evaluation system

Wang, E. L., Matsumura, L. C., Correnti, R. J., Litman, D. J., Zhang, H., Howe, E., Magooda, A., & Quintana, R. (2020) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100449 · Cited by 73 · see citing works

Using automated corrective feedback tools in language learning: a review study

Shadiev, R., & Feng, Y. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2153145 · Cited by 71 · see citing works

UTILIZING GRAMMARLY IN EVALUATING ACADEMIC WRITING: A NARRATIVE RESEARCH ON EFL STUDENTS’ EXPERIENCE

Nova, M. (2018) · Premise Journal of English Education · doi:10.24127/pj.v7i1.1332 · Cited by 84 · see citing works

Automated Feedback and Automated Scoring in the Elementary Grades: Usage, Attitudes, and Associations with Writing Outcomes in a Districtwide Implementation of MI Write

Wilson, J., Huang, Y., Palermo, C., Beard, G., & MacArthur, C. A. (2021) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-020-00236-w · Cited by 71 · see citing works

Attitudes Surrounding an Imperfect AI Autograder

Hsu, S., Li, T. W., Zhang, Z., Fowler, M., Zilles, C. B., & Karahalios, K. G. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445424 · Cited by 69 · see citing works

EFL students’ perception on the use of Grammarly and teacher feedback

Fahmi, M. A., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2021) · JEES (Journal of English Educators Society) · doi:10.21070/jees.v6i1.849 · Cited by 75 · see citing works

The impact of critical feedback choice on students' revision, performance, learning, and memory

Cutumisu, M., & Schwartz, D. L. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.029 · Cited by 49 · see citing works

Formative computer-based feedback in the university classroom: Specific concept maps scaffold students' writing

Lachner, A., Burkhart, C., & Nückles, M. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.008 · Cited by 47 · see citing works

EFL Learners’ English Writing Feedback and Their Perception of Using ChatGPT

Mun, C.-Y. (2024) · STEM Journal · doi:10.16875/stem.2024.25.2.26 · Cited by 74 · see citing works

Toward Asset-based Instruction and Assessment in Artificial Intelligence in Education

Ocumpaugh, J. L., Roscoe, R. D., Baker, R. S., Hutt, S. J., & Aguilar, S. J. (2024) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-023-00382-x · Cited by 45 · see citing works

Chinese University Students’ Attitudes and Perceptions in Learning English Using ChatGPT

Liu, B. (2023) · International Journal of Education and Humanities · doi:10.58557/(ijeh).v3i2.145 · Cited by 40 · see citing works

Modeling the Continuance Intention to Use Automated Writing Evaluation Among Chinese EFL Learners

Li, R. (2021) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211060782 · Cited by 33 · see citing works

Investigating the Effects of Perceived Feedback Source on Second Language Writing Performance: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Reynolds, B. L., Kao, C.-W., & Huang, Y.-Y. (2021) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-021-00597-3 · Cited by 34 · see citing works

Understanding Chinese University EFL Learners' Perceptions of AI in English Writing

Liang, J., Huang, F., & Teo, T. P. (2024) · International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.4018/ijcallt.358918 · Cited by 39 · see citing works

Collaborating with Mature English Language Learners to Combine Peer and Automated Feedback: a User-Centered Approach to Designing Writing Support

Liaqat, A., Munteanu, C., & Epp, C. D. (2020) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-020-00204-4 · Cited by 34 · see citing works

An AI-based English Grammar Checker vs. Human Raters in Evaluating EFL Learners’ Writing

Park, J. (2019) · Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning · Cited by 27 · see citing works

Effectiveness of the Automated Writing Evaluation Program on Improving Undergraduates’ Writing Performance

Geng, J., & Razali, A. B. (2022) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v15n7p49 · Cited by 26 · see citing works

The Platformization of Writing Instruction: Considering Educational Equity in New Learning Ecologies

Stornaiuolo, A., Higgs, J., Nichols, T. P., LeBlanc, R. J., & de Roock, R. S. (2023) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x241227431 · Cited by 31 · see citing works

Automated Writing Instruction and Feedback: Instructional Mode, Attitudes, and Revising

Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., Johnson, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2018) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931218621471 · Cited by 26 · see citing works

Exploring undergraduate students' perceptions of AI vs. human scoring and feedback

Thomas, M., Yildirim-erbasli, S., & Hariharan, S. (2026) · Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101052 · Cited by 24 · see citing works

Contrasting Writing Practice Formats in a Writing Strategy Tutoring System

Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2018) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633118763429 · Cited by 20 · see citing works

ChatGPT and L2 Chinese writing: evaluating the impact of model version and prompt language on automated corrective feedback

Yang, C. T.-Y., & Chen, H. H.-J. (2025) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2025.2453205 · Cited by 19 · see citing works

Elucidating university students’ intentions to seek automated writing feedback from Grammarly: toward perceptual and systemic predictors

Yu-peng, L., & Yu, Z. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03861-1 · Cited by 23 · see citing works

Electronic feedback on second language writing

Chang, C. Y.-H., Cunningham, K. J., Satar, M., & Strobl, C. (2018) · Writing & Pedagogy · doi:10.1558/wap.32515 · Cited by 17 · see citing works

Predictors of middle school students’ perceptions of automated writing evaluation

Wilson, J., Zhang, F., Palermo, C., Cordero, T. M. C., Myers, M. C., Eacker, H., Potter, A., & Coles, J. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104985 · Cited by 17 · see citing works

Embracing Errors for Learning: Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Factors in Feedback Provision and Processing in Dyadic Interactions

Aben, J. E. J., Dingyloudi, F., Timmermans, A. C., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3_7 · Cited by 15 · see citing works

EFL teachers and feedback fatigue: AI to the rescue?

Hyland, K. (2025) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444825101018 · Cited by 20 · see citing works

UKRAINIAN PHD STUDENTS' ATTITUDES TOWARD AI LANGUAGE PROCESSING TOOLS IN THE CONTEXT OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES

Kramar, N., Bedrych, Y., & Shelkovnikova, Z. (2024) · Advanced Education · doi:10.20535/2410-8286.305061 · Cited by 12 · see citing works

Write to improve: exploring the impact of an automated feedback tool on Bahraini learners of English

Wali, F. A., & Huijser, H. (2018) · Learning and Teaching in Higher Education Gulf Perspectives · doi:10.18538/lthe.v15.n1.293 · Cited by 11 · see citing works

Literacy: From the Perspective of Text and Discourse Theory

McNamara, D. S., Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., Balyan, R., & McCarthy, K. S. (2019) · Journal of language and Education · doi:10.17323/jle.2019.10196 · Cited by 10 · see citing works

The Design Implementation Framework

Stone, M. L., Kent, K. M., Roscoe, R. D., Corley, K. M., Allen, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2017) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2639-1.ch004 · Cited by 10 · see citing works

Please Join Me/Us/Them on My/Our/Their Journey to Justice in STEM

Roscoe, R. D. (2022) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2022.2050084 · Cited by 9 · see citing works

The emotional and motivational costs of poorly delivered academic feedback

Akolgo, D. R., Robiullah, A., & Ramirez, G. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1585447 · Cited by 9 · see citing works

Effects of familiarity with digital assessment in online education

Figaredo, D. D., & Gil‐Jaurena, I. (2024) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2024.2372260 · Cited by 8 · see citing works

That’s Not What We Expected: Examining Technology Expectations and Malfunctions on Frustration

Ferreri, N., & Mayhorn, C. B. (2021) · Ergonomics in Design The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications · doi:10.1177/10648046211007709 · Cited by 8 · see citing works

Human Systems Engineering and Educational Technology

Roscoe, R. D., Branaghan, R. J., Cooke, N. J., & Craig, S. D. (2017) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2639-1.ch001 · Cited by 8 · see citing works

Students’ perceptions of automated writing evaluation in autonomous learning

Wang, X. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13378-y · Cited by 7 · see citing works

Identifying and understanding individual differences in frustration with technology

Ferreri, N., & Mayhorn, C. B. (2022) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2022.2095458 · Cited by 6 · see citing works

Automated strategy feedback can improve the readability of physicians’ electronic communications to simulated patients

Roscoe, R. D., Balyan, R., McNamara, D. S., Banawan, M., & Schillinger, D. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103059 · Cited by 6 · see citing works

Examining frustration and performance when priming user expectations and providing a technology malfunction

Ferreri, N., & Mayhorn, C. B. (2020) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181320641444 · Cited by 6 · see citing works

Can Learners Navigate Imperfect Generative Pedagogical Chatbots? An Analysis of Chatbot Errors on Learning

Li, T. W., Song, Y., Sundaram, H., & Karahalios, K. G. (2025) · ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S) · doi:10.1145/3698205.3729550 · Cited by 5 · see citing works

The Effect of Feedback on Informative Text Writing: AI or Teacher?

Baz, M. A., & Hasırcı, S. (2025) · Open Praxis · doi:10.55982/openpraxis.17.3.871 · Cited by 12 · see citing works

Effects of User Experience in Automated Information Processing on Perceived Usefulness of Digital Contact-Tracing Apps: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Schrills, T., Kojan, L., Gruner, M., Valdez, A. S. C., & Franke, T. (2024) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/53940 · Cited by 5 · see citing works

Technology as a Lever for Adolescent Writing

Collins, P., Tate, T. P., & Warschauer, M. (2019) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732219836440 · Cited by 11 · see citing works

EFL Writing Assessment: Peer Assessment vs. Automated Essay Scoring

Lu, M., Deng, Q., & Yang, M. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-38778-5_3 · Cited by 5 · see citing works

Untitled work

(2019) · UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) · Cited by 5 · see citing works

Integrating Corrective Feedback in EFL Classrooms

Rkiki, A., Nadif, B., Sakale, S., & Bidari, S. (2025) · The Journal of Quality in Education · doi:10.37870/joqie.v15i25.472 · Cited by 4 · see citing works

An AWE-Based Diagnosis of L2 English Learners’ Written Errors

Lei, J.-I. (2020) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v13n10p111 · Cited by 4 · see citing works

Classroom Applications of Automated Writing Evaluation

Palermo, C., & Thomson, M. M. (2018) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-6361-7.ch008 · Cited by 4 · see citing works

The effects of AI-assisted feedback on students’ perceptions, emotions, and learning outcomes in L2 writing: a three-level meta-analysis

Liu, C., & Liang, M. (2026) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2026.104018 · Cited by 7 · see citing works

I want to talk to a real person: theorising avoidance in the acceptance and use of automated technologies

Christy, K. R., Jensen, J. D., Britt, B., Scherr, C. L., Jones, C., & Brown, N. R. (2017) · Health Systems · doi:10.1080/20476965.2017.1406568 · Cited by 3 · see citing works

Assessing Foreign Language Narrative Writing Through Automated Writing Evaluation

Lin, C.-A., Lin, Y.-L., & Tsai, P. (2020) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-3062-7.ch006 · Cited by 3 · see citing works

Automated Essay Feedback Generation in the Learning of Writing: A Review of the Field

Lagakis, P., & Demetriadis, S. (2022) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96296-8_40 · Cited by 3 · see citing works

Understanding User Experience with AI-Assisted Writing Service

Kim, G., Kim, J., & Kim, H. K. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35894-4_19 · Cited by 4 · see citing works

Human Systems Engineering and Educational Technology

Roscoe, R. D., Branaghan, R. J., Cooke, N. J., & Craig, S. D. (2018) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-5472-1.ch104 · Cited by 3 · see citing works

The effectiveness of Grammarly application and teacher feedback for undergraduate EFL students' writing skills

Miranty, D., Widiati, U., Cahyono, B. Y., & Sharif, T. I. S. T. (2025) · Innoeduca International Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation · doi:10.24310/ijtei.111.2025.20521 · Cited by 8 · see citing works

Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Girişimcilik Dersini Seçme Nedenleri ve Dersten Beklentileri

Marangoz, M., & Dolu, Z. T. (2021) · İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi · doi:10.25204/iktisad.947015 · Cited by 2 · see citing works

Potential Pitfalls of False Positives

Dey, I., Gnesdilow, D., Passonneau, R. J., & Puntambekar, S. (2024) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-64315-6_45 · Cited by 2 · see citing works

Meta-Analysis of Using AI-Based Feedback Systems in Developing College Students’ Academic Writing Skills

Qassrawi, R. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-2532-1_20 · Cited by 2 · see citing works

Automatic Integrated Scoring Model for English Composition Oriented to Part‐Of‐Speech Tagging

Chen, F. (2021) · Complexity · doi:10.1155/2021/5544257 · Cited by 2 · see citing works

Individual Differences in Frustration and Performance with Online Shopping Activities

Ferreri, N., & Mayhorn, C. B. (2021) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181321651054 · Cited by 2 · see citing works

Ai Generated vs. Peer Feedback in Esl Writing:Effects on Writing Skill, Self-Efficacy, And EnjoymentPreprint

Fang, Y. G., Tan, Y., Zuo, C., & Boubaker, A. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5115438 · Cited by 2 · see citing works

Factors Influencing Students' Perceptions of Automated Feedback and Their Impact on Revision

Dey, I., Gnesdilow, D., Smith, R., Kim, C., Passonneau, R. J., & Puntambekar, S. (2025) · Proceedings. · doi:10.22318/icls2025.149514 · Cited by 1 · see citing works

Chinese Language Learners’ Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Perceptions of a Pinyin Text-to-Speech System

Soon, G. Y., Warris, S. N., & Marimuthu, R. (2020) · New language learning and teaching environments · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-34212-8_15 · Cited by 1 · see citing works

PROBING INTO STUDENTS’ USE OF AUTOMATED FEEDBACK IN ESSAY REVISION: A CASE STUDY OF TWO CHINESE EFL LEARNERS

Jian, W., & Tengyao, Z. (2022) · The Journal of English Literacy Education The Teaching and Learning of English as a Foreign Language · doi:10.36706/jele.v9i2.18349 · Cited by 1 · see citing works

Bibliometrically and systematically analyzing automated writing evaluation for English learning

Wu, T., & Yu, Z. (2023) · Forum for Linguistic Studies · doi:10.59400/fls.v5i3.1907 · Cited by 1 · see citing works

Perbedaan Kemampuan Koordinasi Gerak, Umur, Jenis Kelamin dan Lokasi Sekolah Siswa

Nugraha, Y. S., Damrah, D., & Bakhtiar, S. (2022) · Jurnal Basicedu · doi:10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2154

Perceptions of Computer-Mediated Feedback in English as a Second /Foreign Language Writing: A Review Study from 2010 to 2020

Tianran, W. (2022) · The Proceedings of the International Academic Conference on Teaching, Learning and Education. · doi:10.33422/4th.icmef.2022.10.400

Technology Integration in Christian Religious Education Teacher Professional Development to Produce Scientific Writing

Simanjuntak, J. M. (2023) · Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Kristen (JUPAK) · doi:10.52489/jupak.v4i1.161

Artificial Intelligence Language Models: The Path to Development or Regression for Education?

Gonçalves, B. F., & Gonçalves, V. (2024) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44131-8_6

Automated Writing Evaluation for Second Language Placement TestingPreprint

Link, S., Yang, H., Li, Z., & Koltovskaia, S. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4897693

Integrating Automated Writing Evaluation into EFL Writing PracticePreprint

Alshehri, M. G. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4793625/v1

Enhancing English as a Foreign Language Learners’ Writing Performance and Experience With an Artificial Intelligence Powered Tool

Yang, S. (2024) · Educational communications and technology: issues and innovations · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-76293-2_9

Automatic Essay Scoring Feedback

Hrubik, J., & Morgan, D. N. (2023) · Middle Grades Research Journal · doi:10.1108/mgrj-07-2023-0005

Longitudinal Evaluation of Student Writing Improvement Using Human-in-the-Loop Open-SLLMs for Automated Scoring and Revision

Sunitha, G., Vaishnavi, M. S., Joshitha, V., Rajesh, M., Phani, V. A., & Amala, K. (2025) · International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence and Computing (ICAAIC) · doi:10.1109/icaaic64647.2025.11330583

Junior high school students’ engagement with automated feedback in EFL writing: a case from China

Lin, Y., & Guo, Y. (2026) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2025-0122

Understanding User Experience in AI-Based Evaluation Systems: A Systematic Literature Review

Park, H., Chung, G., Kim, C., & Kim, H. K. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-29653-5_21

Developing L2 writing student self-assessment literacy through AI-generated feedback and AI chain-of-thought: An action research study with lower-proficiency university EFL learners

Ye, P., Yu, S., LEE, I. B. H., & LIANG, C. (2026) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105716

The role of psychological contract in sustaining learner engagement with AWE systems

Hu, X., Hu, J., Chen, S., & Li, Z. (2026) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2026.101101

Leveraging generative AI to enhance teacher feedback for EFL writing: an action research study

Yu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2026) · Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-026-09498-9

Toward More Effective Automated Writing Evaluation Through Relational Trust

Goldshtein, M., Chiou, E. K., & Roscoe, R. D. (2026) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-026-09999-y

The Cost of Algorithmic Assessment: How AI Grading Undermines Academic Motivation and Amplifies AI Reliance Intentions

Namkoong, J., & Burnham, T. A. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16101718

Automated Writing Evaluation: Users’ Perception and Expectations

UiTM Cawangan Terengganu, D. C., & Mat, A. C. (2024) · International Journal of Information and Education Technology · doi:10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.2.2039 · Cited by 4 · see citing works

Teacher and the Machine: Perceptions of Computer-Generated Writing Feedback

Mackay, A. (2022) · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)

Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes?

Chen, C.-F. E., & Cheng, W.-Y. E. C. (2008) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44145 · Cited by 304 · see citing works

A Systematic Review of Automated Writing Evaluation Feedback: Validity, Effects and Students’ Engagement

Liu, W. (2024) · Language Teaching Research Quarterly · doi:10.32038/ltrq.2024.45.05 · Cited by 22 · see citing works

Can Automated Writing Evaluation Programs Help Students Improve Their English Writing?

Wang, P. (2013) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature · doi:10.7575/ijalel.v.2n.1p.6 · Cited by 28 · see citing works