Cited by 107Writing and Handwriting EducationInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Teacher implementation of Self-Regulated Strategy Development with an automated writing evaluation system: Effects on the argumentative writing performance of middle school students

Palermo, Corey, Thomson, Margareta Maria·2018·Contemporary Educational Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.07.002

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Automated essay scoring tools like MI Write can help students improve their writing motivation, writing self-efficacy, and writing skills.

    “Several studies have demonstrated that automated essay scoring tools like MI Write can help students to improve their writing motivation (Wilson & Czik, 2016), writing self-efficacy (Wilson & Roscoe, 2020) and writing skills (Palermo & Thomson, 2018)”

    From Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence (2022) · cites this paper as Palermo & Thomson, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palermo, C., & Thomson, M. M.
Affiliations
North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Palermo, Corey
Venue
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
54
Pages
255-270
ISSN
0361-476X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2856745662
Cited by
107
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5
FWCI
20.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Contemporary Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
self-regulated strategy development, automated writing evaluation, argumentative writing, writing instruction, junior high school students, writing quality, teacher implementation, low-intensity intervention, social validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review