Bad vibrations? Cell phone dependency predicts phantom communication experiences
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other studies identified that PSU strongly predicted the extent to which users experienced imagined smartphone signals.
“Other studies identified that PSU strongly predicted the extent to which users experienced imagined smartphone signals (e.g., Kruger & Djerf, 2017;Li & Lin, 2019;Tanis et al., 2015).”
From Antecedents and consequences of problematic smartphone use: A systematic literature review of an emerging research area (2021) · cites this paper as Kruger & Djerf, 2017
Cites
Online Social Networking and Addiction—A Review of the Psychological Literature
Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2011) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph8093528 · Cited by 2,038 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recognizing that individuals higher in conscientiousness are less prone to addictive tendencies, including Internet addictions (Kuss & Griffiths, 2011; Wilson, Fornasier, & White, 2010), Drouin et al. (2012) found that those higher in conscientiousness were less likely to experience phantom…”
BackgroundThe role of impulsivity in actual and problematic use of the mobile phone
Billieux, J., Van der Linden, M., & Rochat, L. (2008) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1429 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Natural rewards, neuroplasticity, and non-drug addictions
Olsen, C. M. (2011) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.03.010 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Does impulsivity relate to perceived dependence on and actual use of the mobile phone?
Billieux, J., Van der Linden, M., d'Acremont, M., Ceschi, G., & Zermatten, A. (2007) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1289 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Phantom vibrations among undergraduates: Prevalence and associated psychological characteristics
Drouin, M., Kaiser, D. H., & Miller, D. A. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.013 · Cited by 104 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Drouin et al. (2012) found that those who checked for text messages more often and were more anxious when they did not receive immediate replies were more bothered by phantom vibrations.”
BackgroundInfluentialPhantom vibration syndrome among medical staff: a cross sectional survey
Rothberg, M. B., Arora, A., Hermann, J., Kleppel, R., Marie, P. S., & Visintainer, P. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c6914 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Busch, P. A., & McCarthy, S. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106414 · Cited by 657 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kruger, D. J., & Djerf, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kruger, Daniel J.
- ORCID
- Kruger, Daniel J.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 70
- Pages
- 360-364
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2579406103
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 14.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Michigan's
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- signal detection, psychological dependence, conscientiousness, neuroticism, emotional stability, personality traits, sex differences, age differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
