Cited by 80Hallucinations in medical conditionsTactile and Sensory InteractionsPain Management and Treatment

Phantom vibration syndrome among medical staff: a cross sectional survey

Open access
Rothberg, M. B., Arora, A., Hermann, J., Kleppel, R., Marie, P. S., Visintainer, P.·2010·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of and risk factors for experiencing "phantom vibrations," the sensory hallucination sometimes experienced by people carrying pagers or cell phones when the device is not vibrating. DESIGN: Cross sectional survey. SETTING: Academic medical centre. PARTICIPANTS: 176 medical staff who responded to questionnaire (76% of the 232 people invited). Measurements Electronic survey consisting of 17 questions about demographics, device use, phantom vibrations experienced, and attempts to stop them. RESULTS: Of the 169 participants who answered the question, 115 (68%, 95% confidence interval 61% to 75%) reported having experienced phantom vibrations. Most (68/112) who experienced phantom vibrations did so after carrying the device between 1 month and 1 year, and 13% experienced them daily. Four factors were independently associated with phantom vibrations: occupation (resident v attending physician, prevalence ratio 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 1.97), device location (breast pocket v belt, prevalence ratio 1.66, 1.29 to 2.14), hours carried (per 6 hour increment, prevalence ratio 1.30, 1.07 to 1.58), and more frequent use in vibrate mode (per frequency category, prevalence ratio 1.18, 1.03 to 1.34). Of those who experienced phantom vibrations, 43 (39%, 30% to 48%) were able to stop them. Strategies for stopping phantom vibrations included taking the device off vibrate mode, changing the location of the device, and using a different device (success rates 75% v 63% v 50%, respectively, P=0.217). However, 39% (30% to 49%) of respondents did not attempt any strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Phantom vibration syndrome is common among those who use electronic devices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.c6914

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Over-responsiveness to innocuous sensations is particularly prevalent in those whose devices are particularly meaningful.

    “and that this over-responsiveness to innocuous sensations is particularly prevalent in those whose devices are particularly meaningful (e.g., Rothberg et al. 2010).”

    From Brain Drain: The Mere Presence of One’s Own Smartphone Reduces Available Cognitive Capacity (2017) · cites this paper as Rothberg et al. 2010

    The Discussion reports that phantom vibrations were most common among students and house staff and speculates that their pages may be more likely to require urgent attention. It does not measure how meaningful participants found their devices or establish that meaningfulness predicts phantom vibrations. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Laramie D. Emotional and behavioral aspects of mobile phone use [PhD thesis]. Alliant International University, 2007.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rothberg, M. B., Arora, A., Hermann, J., Kleppel, R., Marie, P. S., & Visintainer, P.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Rothberg, M. B.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2010-12-15
Volume
341
Issue
dec15 2
Pages
c6914-c6914
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2024788983
Cited by
79
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
sensory hallucinations, mobile phone use, pagers, healthcare workers, physicians, residents (medical training), device location, prevalence, risk factors, coping strategies
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hallucinations, Humans, Male, Medical Staff, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Syndrome, Vibration, Cell Phone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review