Cited by 104Impact of Technology on AdolescentsPersonal Information Management and User BehaviorTactile and Sensory Interactions

Phantom vibrations among undergraduates: Prevalence and associated psychological characteristics

Drouin, Michelle, Kaiser, Daren H., Miller, Daniel A.·2012·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.013

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drouin, M., Kaiser, D. H., & Miller, D. A.
Affiliations
Indiana University – Purdue University Fort Wayne (US)
Corresponding author
Drouin, Michelle
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
1490-1496
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982029836
Cited by
104
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
22.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
mobile phone use, conscientiousness, undergraduate students, young adults, prevalence, psychological characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review