Cited by 142

Batching smartphone notifications can improve well-being

Fitz, Nicholas, Kushlev, Kostadin, Jagannathan, Ranjan, Lewis, Terrel, Paliwal, Devang, Ariely, Dan·2019·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.016

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effectiveness of online message batching depends on individual and contextual factors.

    “This research design allows us to empirically verify the recent theoretical proposition that the effectiveness of online message batching depends on individual and contextual factors (Fitz et al., 2019; Kushlev and Dunn, 2015) and examine whether email batching is also effective in a real-world setting.”

    From For whom and under what circumstances does email message batching work? (2022) · cites this paper as Fitz et al., 2019

  • The effectiveness of online message batching may depend on individual and contextual factors.

    “empirically verifies the theoretical proposition that the effectiveness of online message batching may depend on individual and contextual factors”

    From For whom and under what circumstances does email message batching work? (2022) · cites this paper as Fitz et al., 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fitz, N., Kushlev, K., Jagannathan, R., Lewis, T., Paliwal, D., & Ariely, D.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
101
Pages
84-94
ISSN
0747-5632
Cited by
142
References
17
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review