Cited by 104COVID-19 and Mental HealthImpact of Technology on AdolescentsCommunication and COVID-19 Impact

Fear of COVID-19, loneliness, smartphone addiction, and mental wellbeing among the Turkish general population: a serial mediation model

Open access
Kayis, A. Rifat, Satici, Begum, Deniz, M. Engin, Satici, Seydi Ahmet, Griffiths, Mark D.·2022·Behaviour & Information Technology

Abstract

The novel coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has become a major health problem worldwide. The impact of COVID-19 has also been associated with psychological and social problems. The main objective of the present study was to examine the associations between fear of COVID-19 and mental wellbeing, through a serial mediation analysis that included loneliness and smartphone addiction. Utilising convenience sampling from 73 of 81 cities in Turkey via the web-based survey the present study comprised 773 participants (556 females and 217 males; aged between 18 and 66 years) were collected. Self-report data were collected including psychometric measures assessing fear of COVID-19, loneliness, smartphone addiction, and mental wellbeing. Fear of COVID-19 was found to have both a direct and indirect effect on mental wellbeing. In addition, results supported a serial mediation model where fear of COVID-19 was found to influence mental wellbeing via loneliness and smartphone addiction in a sequential manner. The findings suggest that higher fear of COVID-19 is associated with lower mental wellbeing by negatively affecting individuals’ emotion and behaviour.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0144929x.2021.1933181

Cites

99 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fear of COVID-19 and anxiety regarding COVID-19 infection are significant positive predictors of smartphone addiction.

    “Research has shown that the fear of COVID-19 and anxiety regarding COVID-19 infection are identified as significant positive predictors of smartphone addiction [10,11].”

    From COVID-19 Victimization Experience and College Students’ Mobile Phone Addiction: A Moderated Mediation Effect of Future Anxiety and Mindfulness (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

    Section 4.3 (p. 7) reports that fear of COVID-19 significantly and positively predicted smartphone addiction (B = 0.237, p < .001). The paper measured fear of COVID-19, but the cited passages do not establish anxiety about infection as a separate significant predictor. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Akta ş , H., and N. Y ı lmaz. 2017. ' Smartphone Addiction in Terms of the Elements of Loneliness and Shyness of University Youth. ' International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research 3 (1): 85 -100. doi:10.24289/ijsser. 283590. · DOI
  2. (2003). ' In Who ' s Afraid of? , edited by M. Gymnich, 109 -139. Göttingen: Bonn University Press.
  3. Keldal, G. 2015. ' Turkish Version of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study. ' Journal of Happiness &amp; Well-Being 3 (1): 103 -115.
  4. Nunnally, J. C., and I. H. Bernstein. 1994. Psychometric Theory . 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  5. Öhman, A. 2008. ' Fear and Anxiety. ' In Handbook of Emotions , edited by M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, and L. F. Barrett, 709 -729. New York: The Guilford Press.
  6. Panicker, J., and R. Sachdev. 2014. ' Relations among Loneliness, Depression, Anxiety, Stress and Problematic Internet Use. ' International Journal of Research in Applied, Natural and Social Sciences 2 (9): 1 -10.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kayis, A. R., Satici, B., Deniz, M. E., Satici, S. A., & Griffiths, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychological Counselling, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, Turkey
  • Department of Psychological Counselling, Artvin Coruh University, Artvin, Turkey
  • Yıldız Technical University (TR)
  • Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Corresponding author
Griffiths, Mark D.
Venue
Behaviour & Information Technology
Published
2021-05-26
Volume
41
Issue
11
Pages
2484-2496
ISSN
  • 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-3001
OpenAlex
W3164210675
Cited by
104
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 8
FWCI
15.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour and Information Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
Keywords
fear of COVID-19, loneliness, smartphone addiction, psychological well-being, serial mediation, psychological impact of COVID-19

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review