Cited by 34Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesImpact of Technology on AdolescentsCyberloafing and Workplace Behavior

When facebook and finals collide - procrastinatory social media usage predicts enhanced anxiety☆

Sternberg, Nurit, Luria, Roy, Chandhok, Susannah, Vickers, Brian, Kross, Ethan, Sheppes, Gal·2020·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106358

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sternberg, N., Luria, R., Chandhok, S., Vickers, B., Kross, E., & Sheppes, G.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
  • Sternberg, Nurit
  • Sheppes, Gal
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
109
Pages
106358
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3014699500
Cited by
34
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
Blavatnik Interdisciplinary Cyber Research Center (2017117)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
Keywords
procrastination, social media use, Facebook, anxiety, goal pursuit, digital distraction, causal evidence, ecological momentary assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review