Cited by 34Cybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesLegal and Social Justice StudiesStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

Parental guardianship and online sexual grooming of teenagers: A honeypot experiment

Kamar, Eden, Maimon, David, Weisburd, David, Shabat, Dekel·2022·Computers in Human Behavior

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107386

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kamar, E., Maimon, D., Weisburd, D., & Shabat, D.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Georgia State University (US)
Corresponding author
Kamar, Eden
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
137
Pages
107386
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4290724698
Cited by
34
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6
FWCI
6.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Social Justice Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
online sexual grooming, parental supervision, adolescents, chat rooms, cyber victimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review