Cited by 119Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingCybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesChild Abuse and Trauma

Offense processes of online sexual grooming and abuse of children via internet communication platforms

Open access
Kloess, Juliane A., Hamilton-Giachritsis, Catherine E., Beech, Anthony R.·2019·Sexual Abuse

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to provide an inclusive and realistic account of the offense processes of naturally occurring, sexually exploitative interactions between offenders and victims that took place via Internet communication platforms, and develop an offense process diagram of online sexual grooming and abuse. Five case series, comprising 29 transcripts of 22 interactions, were analyzed using the qualitative approach of thematic analysis. Police reports were reviewed for descriptive and case-specific information. The five offenders were men aged between 27 and 52 years ( M = 33.6, SD = 5.6), and the number of children they communicated with ranged from one to 12 ( M = 4.6, SD = 4.5). Victims were aged between 11 and 15 ( M = 13.0, SD = 1.2), and were both female ( n = 17) and male ( n = 6). Findings revealed that offenders employed either an indirect or a direct approach to conversations with victims and initiating contact with them. The approach offenders employed was also reflected in the types of strategies they used. Only two offenders were found to engage in aspects of sexual grooming as part of an indirect approach; the majority of the interactions by the other three offenders, that lacked features of sexual grooming altogether, were found to be of a direct approach. These findings are discussed in relation to current issues surrounding terminology and definition of sexual grooming, as well as theoretical and practical implications, concluding with suggestions for future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1079063217720927

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some individuals intentionally utilized websites designed for and popular among children and young people, such as public chat rooms of a particular topic, to identify and approach potential victims.

    “Some individuals described intentionally utilizing websites designed for and popular among children and young people, such as public chat rooms of a particular topic (area), to identify and approach potential victims (Kloess et al., 2019).”

    From Unraveling the Complexities of Offender Strategies as Part of Online Sexual Grooming and Technology-Assisted Child Sexual Abuse: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Kloess et al., 2019

    The Initial Contact/Approach section reports that an offender accessed a public chat room geared toward adolescents aged 13–19, and the Discussion says most offenders accessed platforms geared toward or popular among children. The paper does not establish that they deliberately chose those sites to identify victims, nor does it describe the chat room as devoted to a particular topic. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Others reported a preference for targeting victims on websites which offered a video chat function due to the opportunities this presents for facilitating sexual interactions.

    “Others reported a preference for targeting victims on websites which offered a video chat function due to the opportunities this presents for facilitating sexual interactions (De Santisteban et al., 2018; Kloess et al., 2019).”

    From Unraveling the Complexities of Offender Strategies as Part of Online Sexual Grooming and Technology-Assisted Child Sexual Abuse: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Kloess et al., 2019

    The Initial Contact/Approach section (page unavailable) describes offenders using websites with video-chat functions, and the Discussion (page unavailable) reports attempts to engage victims in sexual activity via webcam. The paper does not say offenders reported preferring those websites for that reason. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Flattery often directly preceded a sexual request.

    “Flattery also often directly preceded a sexual request (Kloess etal., 2019; Powell etal., 2021; Seymour-Smith & Kloess, 2021).”

    From Unraveling the Complexities of Offender Strategies as Part of Online Sexual Grooming and Technology-Assisted Child Sexual Abuse: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Kloess et al., 2019

    The Grooming section says offenders used flattery to prepare victims before online sexual activity, and the Discussion links flattery with introducing sexual topics. Neither passage establishes that flattery often occurred directly before a sexual request; the paper also describes flattery after sexual activity. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Four included articles described that individuals often presented themselves as a trustworthy confidante as a method of building a deeper emotional connection with the victim and sustaining engagement.

    “Four of the included articles described how individuals often presented themselves as a trustworthy confidante as a method of building a deeper, emotional connection with the victim, and sustaining engagement (De Santisteban et al., 2018; Kloess etal., 2019; Powell etal., 2021; Whittle etal., 2015).”

    From Unraveling the Complexities of Offender Strategies as Part of Online Sexual Grooming and Technology-Assisted Child Sexual Abuse: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Kloess et al., 2019

    The Grooming section describes an offender in Case 2 presenting as a friend and offering advice and encouragement. It also says that making victims feel special helped establish a relationship and appeared aimed at continued engagement. But it identifies the friend-and-adviser role in one case, not as something offenders often did, and does not specifically describe them as trustworthy confidantes. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Individuals typically requested the child's contact information, including telephone number, instant messaging account details, and less commonly email address, to migrate communication.

    “Individuals typically fulfilled this desire by requesting the child's contact information, including their telephone number (De Santisteban etal., 2018; Kloess etal., 2019; Shannon, 2008), instant messaging account details (Kloess etal., 2017, 2019; Shannon, 2008), and, less commonly, their email address (Kloess et al., 2017).”

    From Unraveling the Complexities of Offender Strategies as Part of Online Sexual Grooming and Technology-Assisted Child Sexual Abuse: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Kloess et al., 2019

    The Initial Contact/Approach section (page not provided) reports exchanges of email addresses to move conversations to private instant messaging and an offender asking whether victims had an instant messaging account. It does not establish that offenders typically requested telephone numbers or instant messaging account details. The ‘less commonly’ email claim is cited to Kloess et al. (2017), not this paper. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cooper, A., & Griffin-Shelley, E. (2002). Introduction. The Internet: The next sexual revolution. In Cooper, A. (Ed.), Sex and the Internet: A guidebook for clinicians (pp. 1- 15). New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.
  2. Robson, C. (2011). Real world research. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  3. Whittle, H. C., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C. E., & Beech, A. R. (2014b). "Under his spell": Victims' perspectives of being groomed online. Social Sciences, 3, 404-426. doi:10.3390/socsci30x000x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kloess, J. A., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C. E., & Beech, A. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
Kloess, Juliane A.
Venue
Sexual Abuse
Published
2017-07-17
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
73-96
ISSN
  • 1079-0632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-286X
OpenAlex
W2729455610
Cited by
118
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Sexual Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
online sexual grooming, child sexual abuse, victim-offender relationship, indirect approach, direct approach, child sexual exploitation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Communication, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pedophilia, Crime Victims, Internet, Criminals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review