A systematic review of fantasy driven vs. contact driven internet-initiated sexual offences: Discrete or overlapping typologies?
Abstract
Within the literature individuals who use the internet to facilitate the sexual abuse of a minor are generally classified as being fantasy or contact driven. Classification is based upon the intended location for sexual climax: fantasy driven individuals aim to reach sexual climax online, whereas contact driven individuals target minors to achieve physical sex offline. This review systematically investigates whether there is an empirical basis for the distinction between these two proposed discrete types. Comparison of tactics and behaviour are considered to examine whether the contact vs. fantasy distinction is useful. A two-stage literature selection process, considered against pre-determined inclusion criteria, identified a total of twenty-two studies. As methodological heterogeneity limited the ability to conduct pooled analysis, a narrative synthesis of data employing an interpretive approach was conducted. This showed that the contact and fantasy distinction is ambiguous, given that both groups engage in online behaviours that provide them with online sexual gratification that can also lead to offline contact. Furthermore, no clear pattern of behaviour was found to define contact and fantasy individuals idiosyncratically. The European Online Grooming Project typology is thus proposed as a better representation of this behaviour; intimacy seeking, adaptable and hypersexualized groups. The distinction between these groups focuses primarily on the intensity of the relationship, acknowledging that sexual abuse can occur with or without offline contact. This review also highlights the need for larger, methodologically robust studies that examine the behaviour of online child sexual offenders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Empirically, the proposed distinction is ambiguous as both groups (at least) initially engage in subjectively sexually rewarding online behaviors that only under specific circumstances may lead to offline sexual abuse.
“Empirically, it turned out that the proposed distinction is ambiguous as both groups (at least) initially engage in subjectively sexually rewarding online behaviors that only under specific circumstances may lead to offline sexual abuse.”
From 3.2 Sexual Online Grooming of Children – A Short Overview of the Offender Literature (2025) · cites this paper as Broome et al., 2018
Decoys respond openly to sexual solicitations, appear compliant, and might be more likely to continue within an uncomfortable conversation compared to a child.
“Since decoys aim to obtain as much incriminating information as possible, they respond openly to sexual solicitations (Briggs et al., 2011), appear compliant (Broome et al., 2018), and might be more likely to continue within an uncomfortable conversation (Williams et al., 2013) compared to a child.”
From Offender strategies for engaging children in online sexual activity (2021) · cites this paper as Broome et al., 2018
A systematic review failed to find an empirical basis for the division between contact-driven and fantasy-driven offenders, as the distinctions between the two sub-groups were ambiguous, given that both groups engage in online behavior that provides them with sexual gratification.
“However, a systematic review failed to find an empirical basis for this division as the distinctions between the two sub-groups were ambiguous, given that both groups engage in online behavior that provides them with sexual gratification (Broome et al., 2018).”
From Offender strategies for engaging children in online sexual activity (2021) · cites this paper as Broome et al., 2018
Offenders can use a scattergun approach, sending messages to hundreds of different children at the same time, and await the most gullible to take the bait.
“By using a scattergun approach (Broome et al., 2018) and sending messages to hundreds of different children at the same time (FBI, 2015; Ulricehamn tidning, 2017), the offender can await the most gullible to take the bait.”
From Offender strategies for engaging children in online sexual activity (2021) · cites this paper as Broome et al., 2018
Both fantasy-driven and contact-driven offenders engage in online sexual gratification.
“Similar to the overlap between fantasy-driven and contact-driven offenders, showing that both groups engage in online sexual gratification (Broome et al., 2018), all offenders in this study tried to engage in online sexual activity while only a few arranged an offline meeting with the child.”
From Offender strategies for engaging children in online sexual activity (2021) · cites this paper as Broome et al., 2018
Reviews specifically on prevalence rates and risk factors of cybergrooming victimization were narrative rather than systematic.
“Although research syntheses on various aspects of cybergrooming exist (e.g., Broome et al., 2018; Whittle et al., 2013a), reviews specifically on prevalence rates and risk factors of cybergrooming victimization were narrative rather than systematic, while reviews on outcomes have not been conducted at all.”
From Cybergrooming Victimization Among Young People: A Systematic Review of Prevalence Rates, Risk Factors, and Outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as Broome et al., 2018
Reviews on outcomes of cybergrooming victimization have not been conducted at all.
“Although research syntheses on various aspects of cybergrooming exist (e.g., Broome et al., 2018; Whittle et al., 2013a), reviews specifically on prevalence rates and risk factors of cybergrooming victimization were narrative rather than systematic, while reviews on outcomes have not been conducted at all.”
From Cybergrooming Victimization Among Young People: A Systematic Review of Prevalence Rates, Risk Factors, and Outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as Broome et al., 2018
Scoping or systematic reviews were conducted less frequently, focusing on cybergrooming strategies and perpetrator typologies.
“Scoping or systematic reviews were conducted less frequently, focusing on cybergrooming strategies (Ringenberg et al., 2022) and perpetrator typologies (Broome et al., 2018; Del Castillo et al., 2021).”
From Cybergrooming Victimization Among Young People: A Systematic Review of Prevalence Rates, Risk Factors, and Outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as Broome et al., 2018
No clear SOG pattern distinguishing between both types could be identified.
“More importantly, no clear SOG pattern distinguishing between both types could be identified (Broome et al., 2018);”
From 3.2 Sexual Online Grooming of Children – A Short Overview of the Offender Literature (2025) · cites this paper as Broome et al., 2018
Broome and colleagues (2018) argued that an older typology proposed by the European Online Grooming Project (Webster et al., 2012) might be more useful.
“Broome and colleagues (2018) argued that an older typology proposed by the European Online Grooming Project (Webster et al., 2012) might be more useful:”
From 3.2 Sexual Online Grooming of Children – A Short Overview of the Offender Literature (2025) · cites this paper as Broome et al., 2018
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823 · see citing works
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194 · see citing works
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042 · see citing works
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859 · see citing works
Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1
Prensky, M. (2001) · On the Horizon · doi:10.1108/10748120110424816 · Cited by 11,104 · see citing works
Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants
(2012) · Corwin Press eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483387765.n6 · Cited by 7,114 · see citing works
Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-5664 · Cited by 4,074 · see citing works
Vandenbroucke, J. P., Elm, E. V., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., Poole, C., Schlesselman, J. J., Egger, M., & initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010-w1 · Cited by 3,543 · see citing works
Essential elements of questionnaire design and development
Rattray, J. E., & Jones, M. C. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x · Cited by 1,487 · see citing works
Clarifying differences between review designs and methods
Gough, D., Thomas, J., & Oliver, S. (2012) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-1-28 · Cited by 1,063 · see citing works
(2012) · Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench. · Cited by 526 · see citing works
Sexual grooming of children: Review of literature and theoretical considerations
Craven, S., Brown, S., & Gilchrist, E. (2006) · Journal of Sexual Aggression · doi:10.1080/13552600601069414 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Trends in Youth Internet Victimization: Findings From Three Youth Internet Safety Surveys 2000–2010
Jones, L. M., Mitchell, K. J., & David Finkelhor, B. (2011) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.09.015 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Ybarra, M. L., Espelage, D. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2007) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.010 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Wolak, J., David Finkelhor, B., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.05.006 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Online Victimization of Youth: Five Years Later
Wolak, J., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2006) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e525892015-001 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Contact Sexual Offending by Men With Online Sexual Offenses
Seto, M. C., Hanson, R. K., & Babchishin, K. M. (2010) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063210369013 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Juveniles Who Commit Sex Offenses Against Minors
Finkelhor, D., Ormrod, R. K., & Chaffin, M. J. (2009) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e630532009-001 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Briggs, P., Simon, W. T., & Simonsen, S. (2011) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063210384275 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
A review of online grooming: Characteristics and concerns
Whittle, H., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C., Beech, A., & Collings, G. (2013) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.09.003 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Pedophilia, Hebephilia, and the DSM-V
Blanchard, R., Lykins, A. D., Wherrett, D. K., Kuban, M. E., Cantor, J. M., Blak, T., DICKEY, R. W., & Klassen, P. E. (2008) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9399-9 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
A review of young people's vulnerabilities to online grooming
Whittle, H., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C., Beech, A., & Collings, G. (2013) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.008 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Black, P. J., Wollis, M., Woodworth, M., & Hancock, J. T. (2015) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.12.004 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Seto, M. C., Wood, J. M., Babchishin, K. M., & Flynn, S. (2011) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1037/h0093925 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Malesky, L. A. (2007) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1300/j070v16n02_02 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Identifying sexual grooming themes used by internet sex offenders
Williams, R., Elliott, I. A., & Beech, A. R. (2013) · Deviant Behavior · doi:10.1080/01639625.2012.707550 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Gifford, A. (2002) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(02)00061-6 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Child Pornography and Likelihood of Contact Abuse
Long, M. L., Alison, L. J., & McManus, M. (2012) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063212464398 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
DeHart, D., Dwyer, G., Seto, M. C., Moran, R., Letourneau, E., & Schwarz-Watts, D. (2017) · Journal of Sexual Aggression · doi:10.1080/13552600.2016.1241309 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
(2003) · Cited by 102 · see citing works
The Psychological Profiles of Internet, Contact, and Mixed Internet/Contact Sex Offenders
Elliott, I. A., Beech, A. R., & Mandeville‐Norden, R. (2012) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063212439426 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Understanding grooming discourse in computer-mediated environments
Lorenzo-Dus, N., Izura, C., & Pérez-Tattam, R. (2016) · Discourse, Context & Media · doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2016.02.004 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationQualitative and mixed methods in systematic reviews
Gough, D. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0151-y · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Sexual offenders contacting children online: An examination of transcripts of sexual grooming
Winters, G. M., Kaylor, L. E., & Jeglic, E. L. (2017) · Journal of Sexual Aggression · doi:10.1080/13552600.2016.1271146 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Interpreting the Intentions of Internet Predators: An Examination of Online Predatory Behavior
Marcum, C. D. (2007) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1300/j070v16n04_06 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Rapid skill acquisition and online sexual grooming of children
Quayle, E., Allegro, S., Hutton, L., Sheath, M., & Lööf, L. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.005 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Kloess, J. A., Seymour-Smith, S., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C. E., Long, M. L., Shipley, D., & Beech, A. R. (2017) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063215612442 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
“Cause ur special”: Understanding trust and complimenting behaviour in online grooming discourse
Lorenzo-Dus, N., & Izura, C. (2017) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.004 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationOnline Sexual Solicitation of Minors
Schulz, A., Bergen, E., Schuhmann, P., Hoyer, J., & Santtila, P. O. (2015) · Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0022427815599426 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Child Pornography Possessors and Child Contact Sex Offenders
Faust, E., Bickart, W., Renaud, C. A., & Camp, S. D. (2014) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063214521469 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Miranda, A. O., & Corcoran, C. L. (2000) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/107906320001200302 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Factors associated with contact child sexual abuse in a sample of indecent image offenders
McManus, M., Long, M. L., Alison, L. J., & Almond, L. (2014) · Journal of Sexual Aggression · doi:10.1080/13552600.2014.927009 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Are Crimes by Online Predators Different From Crimes by Sex Offenders Who Know Youth In-Person?
Wolak, J., & David Finkelhor, B. (2013) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.06.010 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Gámez-Guadix, M., De Santisteban, P., & Alcazar, M. Á. (2018) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063217724766 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Bergen, E., Davidson, J., Schulz, A., Schuhmann, P., Johansson, A., Santtila, P., & Jern, P. (2014) · Victims & Offenders · doi:10.1080/15564886.2013.873750 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Sheehan, V., & Sullivan, J. (2010) · Journal of Sexual Aggression · doi:10.1080/13552601003698644 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Correlates and Moderators of Child Pornography Consumption in a Community Sample
Ray, J. V., Kimonis, E. R., & Seto, M. C. (2013) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063213502678 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Characterizing Pedophile Conversations on the Internet using Online Grooming
Gupta, A., Kumaraguru, P., & Sureka, A. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1208.4324 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Shelton, J. L. E., Eakin, J. D., Hoffer, T. A., Muirhead, Y. E., & Owens, J. N. (2016) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2016.07.002 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Linguistic analysis of chat transcripts from child predator undercover sex stings
Drouin, M. A., Boyd, R. L., Hancock, J. T., & James, A. S. (2017) · Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology · doi:10.1080/14789949.2017.1291707 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Behavioural Differences Between Online Sexual Groomers Approaching Boys and Girls
van Gijn-Grosvenor, E. L., & Lamb, M. E. (2016) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1080/10538712.2016.1189473 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Evidence searching for evidence-based psychology practice.
Falzon, L., Davidson, K. W., & Bruns, D. L. (2010) · Professional Psychology Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0021352 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Logistic models for classifying online grooming conversation
Pranoto, H., Gunawan, F. E., & Soewito, B. (2015) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.536 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Barber, C. S., & Bettez, S. C. (2014) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Online interactions involving suspected paedophiles who engage male children
Grosskopf, A. (2010) · doi:10.52922/ti279750 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
McAlinden, A. (2013) · Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Adults' Sexual Interest in Children and Adolescents Online: A Quasi-Experimental Study
Bergen, E., Antfolk, J., Jern, P., Alanko, K., & Santtila, P. O. (2013) · Åbo Akademi University Research Portal · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Queensland police stings in online chat rooms
Krone, T. (2005) · Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice · Cited by 18 · see citing works
National Incident-Based Reporting System, 2001
United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation (2004) · ICPSR Data Holdings · doi:10.3886/icpsr03829 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
National Incident-Based Reporting System, 2001
United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation (2004) · ICPSR Data Holdings · doi:10.3886/icpsr03829.v2 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Offender strategies for engaging children in online sexual activity
Joleby, M., Lunde, C., Landström, S., & Jonsson, L. S. (2021) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105214 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“However, a systematic review failed to find an empirical basis for this division as the distinctions between the two sub-groups were ambiguous, given that both groups engage in online behavior that provides them with sexual gratification (Broome et al., 2018).”
InfluentialLorenzo-Dus, N., Kinzel, A., & Cristofaro, M. D. (2019) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.010 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationParental guardianship and online sexual grooming of teenagers: A honeypot experiment
Kamar, E., Maimon, D., Weisburd, D., & Shabat, D. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107386 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
A Preventive Intervention to Reduce Risk of Online Grooming Among Adolescents
Calvete, E., Orue, I., & Gámez-Guadi, M. (2022) · Psychosocial Intervention · doi:10.5093/pi2022a14 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“Through the processes involved in online grooming, such as progressive sexualization, the abusive adult could subtly manipulate the minor to normalize the sending and sharing of sexual material (Broome et al., 2018).”
Broome, L. J., Izura, C., & Davies, J. (2020) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104647 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationSchittenhelm, C., Kops, M., Moosburner, M., Fischer, S. M., & Wachs, S. (2025) · Adolescent Research Review · doi:10.1007/s40894-024-00248-w · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“Although research syntheses on various aspects of cyber-grooming exist (e.g., Broome et al., 2018; Whittle et al., 2013a), reviews specifically on prevalence rates and risk factors of cybergrooming victimization were narrative rather than systematic, while reviews on outcomes have not been…”
Waring, S., & Giles, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.629236 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Conceptualizing an AI-based Police Robot for Preventing Online Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse:
Sunde, N., & Sunde, I. M. (2021) · Nordic Journal of Studies in Policing · doi:10.18261/issn.2703-7045-2021-02-01 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Child sexual abuse material in child-centred institutions: situational crime prevention approaches
Krone, T., Spiranovic, C. A., Prichard, J., Watters, P., Wortley, R., Gelb, K. R., & Hunn, C. (2020) · Journal of Sexual Aggression · doi:10.1080/13552600.2019.1705925 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Soldino, V., & Seigfried‐Spellar, K. C. (2024) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106696 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Schmidt, F., Bucci, S., & Varese, F. (2023) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106323 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
An analysis of child sexual grooming legislation in the United States
Kaylor, L. E., Winters, G. M., Jeglic, E. L., & Cilli, J. (2022) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2022.2043313 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Users of Online Child Sexual Abuse Material
Huikuri, S. (2023) · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11896-023-09611-4 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Child Sexual Exploitation: Introduction to a Global Problem
Seigfried‐Spellar, K. C., & Soldino, V. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78440-3_53 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Giles, S., & Alison, L. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.606731 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Moosburner, M., Weber, C., Kuban, T., Wachs, S., Schmidt, A. F., Etzler, S., & Rettenberger, M. (2026) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380251316223 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Giles, S., Alison, L. J., Humann, M., Tejeiro, R. A., & Rhodes, H. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1285132 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Reichel, R., Daser, A., Gnielka, F. M., Schmidt, A. F., BLOKLAND, A. A. J., & Lehmann, R. (2024) · Journal of Sexual Aggression · doi:10.1080/13552600.2024.2418100 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Henshaw, M., Darjee, R., & Clough, J. A. (2020) · Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819434-8.00005-2 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Rogers, M., Seigfried‐Spellar, K. C., Bates, S., & Rux, K. (2021) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.14820 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Online Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse
Quayle, E. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108848916.018 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Berens, K. A., Bruer, K. C., Schick, K. D., Evans, A. D., & Price, H. L. (2023) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106407 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
An investigation of the linguistic and deceptive characteristics of online grooming types
Broome, L. J., Izura, C., & Davies, J. (2024) · Journal of Sexual Aggression · doi:10.1080/13552600.2023.2300470 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationFromPlayboyto Prison: When Pornography Use Becomes a Crime
Garman, J. D., Sample, L. L., & Steele, S. A. (2019) · Deviant Behavior · doi:10.1080/01639625.2019.1647923 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Child Sexual Exploitation: Introduction to a Global Problem
Seigfried‐Spellar, K. C., & Soldino, V. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90307-1_53-1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Šupa, M. (2021) · Kriminologijos studijos · doi:10.15388/crimlithuan.2021.9.1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Helgheim, É. P. B., & Frøyland, L. R. (2025) · Nordic Journal of Criminology · doi:10.18261/njc.26.2.7 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Winters, G. M., & Jeglic, E. L. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-07222-2_5 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Fujiwara, Y., Miyadera, T., & Kuhara, E. (2023) · The Japanese journal of psychology · doi:10.4992/jjpsy.94.21052 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Identity deception detection: requirements and a model
van der Walt, E., & Eloff, J. H. P. (2019) · Information and Computer Security · doi:10.1108/ics-01-2019-0017 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Broome, L. J., Izura, C., & Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2018) · Data in Brief · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2018.04.076 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citation3.2 Sexual Online Grooming of Children – A Short Overview of the Offender Literature
Schmidt, A. F. (2025) · Sexual Online Grooming of Children · doi:10.5771/9783748903291-135 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Adolescence et cybergrooming, une violence méconnue en France
Romano, H., Fierdepied, S., & Ribadier, A. (2025) · Neuropsychiatrie de l Enfance et de l Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.neurenf.2025.12.001 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The online sexual offender: what we know to date
DEL CASTILLO, G., GANDOLFI, C. E., MOSILLO, M., FORNI, G., PIETRONIGRO, A., TIWANA, N., & PELLAI, A. (2021) · Minerva Pediatrics · doi:10.23736/s2724-5276.20.05621-2 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Online Sexual Deviance and Pedophilia
Quayle, E. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119771401.ch14 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Psychology and Criminal Behaviour
(2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108848916.012
Transnational child sex offending: understanding threat to disrupt and target
Wefers, S. (2021) · Sheffield Hallam University · doi:10.7190/shu-thesis-00427
“What do mothers know about child sexual abuse?”: A qualitative investigation
Baykal, N. B., Memur, H. N. K., & Öksüz, S. (2022) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106754
Representación discursiva del ciberacoso sexual a menores: del chat a la sentencia judicial
Pérez-Sabater, C., Montes, A. G., & Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2024) · Revista de llengua i dret · doi:10.58992/rld.i82.2024.4231
Self-citationWinters, G. M., & Jeglic, E. L. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73131-0_5
Females who engage in online child sexual exploitation: a critical narrative review
Fortunato, E., Slikboer, R., Henshaw, M., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2025) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2025.2540384 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Nock), G. S. (., Dixon, L., & Tyler, N. (2025) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2025.102094
Hamilton, K., & Brennan, M. (2025) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1080/10538712.2025.2581870
Pienczykowski, B., & Madella, P. (2025) · Corpus Pragmatics · doi:10.1007/s41701-025-00218-0
Identity manipulation in online grooming: Gendered strategies among male suspects
Hermoso, J. S., & Soldino, V. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2026.109056
Ciardha, C. Ó. (2026) · doi:10.1002/9781394289868.ch12
- Authors
- Broome, L. J., Izura, C., & Lorenzo-Dus, N.
- Affiliations
- Swansea University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Broome, Laura Jayne
- Venue
- Child Abuse & Neglect
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 79
- Pages
- 434-444
- ISSN
- 0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2793573567
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 0.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Social Justice Studies
- Keywords
- online child sexual abuse, offender typology, hypersexualization, online grooming, sexual offenses against minors
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Employment, Erotica, Fantasy, Female, Humans, Male, Sexual Behavior, Sex Offenses, Internet, Narration, Criminals, Human Trafficking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review