Cited by 16Cybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesDeception detection and forensic psychologyPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Assessing differences in grooming stages and strategies in decoy, victim, and law enforcement conversations

Ringenberg, Tatiana R., Seigfried-Spellar, Kathryn, Rayz, Julia·2024·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2023.108071

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ringenberg, T. R., Seigfried-Spellar, K., & Rayz, J.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Ringenberg, Tatiana R.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
152
Pages
108071
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389085677
Cited by
16
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
online child sexual exploitation, grooming, law enforcement, chat conversations, risk assessment, triage tool

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review