Cited by 140Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingChild Abuse and TraumaMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

Validation of the Sexual Grooming Model of Child Sexual Abusers

Winters, Georgia M., Jeglic, Elizabeth L., Kaylor, Leah E.·2020·Journal of Child Sexual Abuse

Abstract

Sexual grooming has been deemed an integral part of the child sexual abuse process. However, there has yet to be a universally accepted model for this process and, as a consequence, there is no clear understanding of which behaviors constitute sexual grooming. One proposed model of in-person sexual grooming outlined five stages of the process: 1) victim selection, 2) gaining access and isolating a child, 3) trust development, 4) desensitization to sexual content and physical contact, and 5) maintenance following the abuse. The present study sought to validate this Sexual Grooming Model (SGM) and identify behaviors that may be employed during each stage of the process. First, a thorough review of the literature was conducted to generate a comprehensive list of sexual grooming behaviors ( n = 77). Second, 18 experts in the field completed a survey which asked them to rate the extent to which each of the five stages and potential grooming behaviors were relevant to the sexual grooming process. Results provided support for the SGM and produced 42 behaviors that were considered to be grooming tactics within these stages. From this, the first validated, comprehensive model of in-person sexual grooming is proposed. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications and future directions in the field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10538712.2020.1801935

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Between 30% and 45% of individuals who sexually abuse children utilize sexual grooming behaviors.

    “Although a large number of individuals who sexually abuse children utilize sexual grooming behaviors (between 30% and 45% according to an estimation by Winters et al., 2020)”
  • Winters, Kaylor et al. (2022) have proposed a universal definition of sexual grooming behaviors based on their five-stage sexual grooming model, which is an attempt at integrating prior grooming models.

    “In line with this notion, Winters, Kaylor et al. (2022) have proposed a universal definition of sexual grooming behaviors based on their five-stage sexual grooming model, which is an attempt at integrating prior grooming models (Winters et al., 2020; for a detailed overview of sexual grooming models see Winters & Jeglic, 2022a):”
  • The five-stage model has been validated using expert ratings of the relevance of single behaviors for sexual grooming of children.

    “This five-stage model has been validated using expert ratings of the relevance of single behaviors for sexual grooming of children (Winters et al., 2020)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Winters, G. M., Jeglic, E. L., & Kaylor, L. E.
Affiliations
  • Fairleigh Dickinson University (US)
  • John Jay College of Criminal Justice (US)
Corresponding author
Winters, Georgia M.
Venue
Journal of Child Sexual Abuse
Published
2020-10-02
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
855-875
ISSN
  • 1053-8712 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-0679
OpenAlex
W3091682146
Cited by
140
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Sexual Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
sexual grooming, child sexual abuse, grooming, victim selection, trust building, desensitization, expert validation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Deception, Male, Retrospective Studies, Risk-Taking, Sex Offenses, United States, Internet, Minors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review