Validation of the Sexual Grooming Model of Child Sexual Abusers
Abstract
Sexual grooming has been deemed an integral part of the child sexual abuse process. However, there has yet to be a universally accepted model for this process and, as a consequence, there is no clear understanding of which behaviors constitute sexual grooming. One proposed model of in-person sexual grooming outlined five stages of the process: 1) victim selection, 2) gaining access and isolating a child, 3) trust development, 4) desensitization to sexual content and physical contact, and 5) maintenance following the abuse. The present study sought to validate this Sexual Grooming Model (SGM) and identify behaviors that may be employed during each stage of the process. First, a thorough review of the literature was conducted to generate a comprehensive list of sexual grooming behaviors ( n = 77). Second, 18 experts in the field completed a survey which asked them to rate the extent to which each of the five stages and potential grooming behaviors were relevant to the sexual grooming process. Results provided support for the SGM and produced 42 behaviors that were considered to be grooming tactics within these stages. From this, the first validated, comprehensive model of in-person sexual grooming is proposed. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications and future directions in the field.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Between 30% and 45% of individuals who sexually abuse children utilize sexual grooming behaviors.
“Although a large number of individuals who sexually abuse children utilize sexual grooming behaviors (between 30% and 45% according to an estimation by Winters et al., 2020)”
From 3.2 Sexual Online Grooming of Children – A Short Overview of the Offender Literature (2025) · cites this paper as Winters et al., 2020
Winters, Kaylor et al. (2022) have proposed a universal definition of sexual grooming behaviors based on their five-stage sexual grooming model, which is an attempt at integrating prior grooming models.
“In line with this notion, Winters, Kaylor et al. (2022) have proposed a universal definition of sexual grooming behaviors based on their five-stage sexual grooming model, which is an attempt at integrating prior grooming models (Winters et al., 2020; for a detailed overview of sexual grooming models see Winters & Jeglic, 2022a):”
From 3.2 Sexual Online Grooming of Children – A Short Overview of the Offender Literature (2025) · cites this paper as Winters et al., 2020
The five-stage model has been validated using expert ratings of the relevance of single behaviors for sexual grooming of children.
“This five-stage model has been validated using expert ratings of the relevance of single behaviors for sexual grooming of children (Winters et al., 2020)”
From 3.2 Sexual Online Grooming of Children – A Short Overview of the Offender Literature (2025) · cites this paper as Winters et al., 2020
Cites
Finkelhor, D., Turner, H. A., Shattuck, A., & Hamby, S. L. (2015) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0676 · Cited by 1,264 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Greene-Colozzi, E. A., Winters, G. M., Blasko, B., & Jeglic, E. L. (2020) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1080/10538712.2020.1801938 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationIdentification of red flag child sexual grooming behaviors
Jeglic, E. L., Winters, G. M., & Johnson, B. N. (2023) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105998 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Sexual Grooming Model of Child Sex Trafficking
Winters, G. M., Schaaf, S., Grydehøj, R. F., Allan, C., Lin, A., & Jeglic, E. L. (2022) · Victims & Offenders · doi:10.1080/15564886.2021.1926031 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationExploring sexual grooming in female perpetrated child sexual abuse
Kaylor, L. E., Winters, G. M., & Jeglic, E. L. (2022) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1080/10538712.2021.1994505 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationThe prevalence of sexual grooming behaviors among survivors of childhood sexual abuse
Winters, G. M., Jeglic, E. L., Johnson, B. N., & Chou, C. (2024) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106842 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationRingenberg, T. R., Seigfried-Spellar, K., & Rayz, J. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.108071 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Factors related to delayed disclosure among victims of child sexual abuse in Singapore
Hemanth, P., Fang, L., Chong, S., & Tan, L. J. (2024) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106647 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Moosburner, M., Weber, C., Kuban, T., Wachs, S., Schmidt, A. F., Etzler, S., & Rettenberger, M. (2026) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380251316223 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Aktu, Y. (2024) · Child Abuse Review · doi:10.1002/car.70007 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
3.2 Sexual Online Grooming of Children – A Short Overview of the Offender Literature
Schmidt, A. F. (2025) · Sexual Online Grooming of Children · doi:10.5771/9783748903291-135 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Porcelli, C., Anderson, F., & Kloess, J. A. (2026) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380251411261
- Authors
- Winters, G. M., Jeglic, E. L., & Kaylor, L. E.
- Affiliations
- Fairleigh Dickinson University (US)
- John Jay College of Criminal Justice (US)
- Corresponding author
- Winters, Georgia M.
- Venue
- Journal of Child Sexual Abuse
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-10-02
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 855-875
- ISSN
- 1053-8712 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-0679
- OpenAlex
- W3091682146
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 5.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Child Sexual Abuse (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
- Keywords
- sexual grooming, child sexual abuse, grooming, victim selection, trust building, desensitization, expert validation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Deception, Male, Retrospective Studies, Risk-Taking, Sex Offenses, United States, Internet, Minors, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review