CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Catch me if you search: When contextual web search results affect the detection of hallucinations

Nahar, Mahjabin, Lee, Eun-Ju, Park, Jin Won, Lee, Dongwon·2025·Computers in Human Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2025.108763
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2025.108763

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Aslett, 2024, Online searches to evaluate misinformation can increase its perceived veracity, Nature, 625, 548, 10.1038/s41586-023-06883-y · DOI
  2. Bandura, 1982, Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency, American Psychologist, 37, 122, 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bandura, 1989, Human agency in social cognitive theory, American Psychologist, 44, 1175, 10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Chen, 2022, Just a glance, or more? Pathways from counter-attitudinal incidental exposure to attitude (de)polarization through response behaviors and cognitive elaboration, Journal of Communication, 72, 83, 10.1093/joc/jqab046 · DOI
  5. Cho, 2010, Optimistic bias about online privacy risks: Testing the moderating effects of perceived controllability and prior experience, Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 987, 10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.012 · DOI
  6. Chong, 2022, Human confidence in artificial intelligence and in themselves: The evolution and impact of confidence on adoption of AI advice, Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107018 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Dietvorst, 2015, Algorithm aversion: people erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 114, 10.1037/xge0000033 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Ghenai, A. (2017). Health misinformation in search and social media. In Proceedings of the 2017 international conference on digital health (pp. 235–236). · DOI
  9. Langer, 1978, The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of “placebic” information in interpersonal interaction, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 635, 10.1037/0022-3514.36.6.635 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Li, 2022, Emotion, analytic thinking and susceptibility to misinformation during the COVID-19 outbreak, Computers in Human Behavior, 133, 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107295 · DOI
  11. Liang, 2013, Mindlessness and gaining compliance in computer-human interaction, Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1572, 10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.009 · DOI
  12. Liu, 2021, In AI we trust? Effects of agency locus and transparency on uncertainty reduction in human–AI interaction, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 26, 384, 10.1093/jcmc/zmab013 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Nahar, M., Seo, H., Lee, E.-J., Xiong, A., & Lee, D. (2024). Fakes of Varying Shades: How Warning Affects Human Perception and Engagement Regarding LLM Hallucinations. In First conference on language modeling.
  14. Oeldorf-Hirsch, 2018, The role of engagement in learning from active and incidental news exposure on social media, Mass Communication and Society, 21, 225, 10.1080/15205436.2017.1384022 · DOI
  15. Oh, 2020, Can liking, commenting, and sharing enhance persuasion? The interaction effect between modality interactivity and agency affordances on smokers, Health Communication, 35, 1593, 10.1080/10410236.2019.1654172 · DOI
  16. Orosz, 2024, Strategies to combat misinformation: Enduring effects of a 15-minute online intervention on critical-thinking adolescents, Computers in Human Behavior, 159, 10.1016/j.chb.2024.108338 · DOI
  17. Peng, 2022, How online searches fuel health anxiety: Investigating the link between health-related searches, health anxiety, and future intention, Computers in Human Behavior, 136, 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107384 · DOI
  18. Pennycook, 2019, Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning, Cognition, 188, 39, 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Renier, 2021, To err is human, not algorithmic–robust reactions to erring algorithms, Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106879 · DOI
  20. Rotter, 1966, Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement, Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 10.1037/h0092976 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Sammons, M., Vydiswaran, V. V., & Roth, D. (2010). Ask not what textual entailment can do for you.... In Proceedings of the 48th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 1199–1208).
  22. Seo, H., Lee, S., Lee, D., & Xiong, A. (2024). Reliability Matters: Exploring the Effect of AI Explanations on Misinformation Detection With a Warning. Vol. 18, In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media (pp. 1395–1407). · DOI
  23. Shin, 2019, Role of fairness, accountability, and transparency in algorithmic affordance, Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 277, 10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.019 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Southwell, 2007, Translating user control availability into perception: The moderating role of prior experience, Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 554, 10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.025 · DOI
  25. Su, 2022, “I enjoy thinking critically, and I’m in control”: Examining the influences of media literacy factors on misperceptions amidst the COVID-19 infodemic, Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107111 · DOI
  26. Tordesillas, 1999, Thinking too much or too little? The effects of introspection on the decision-making process, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 625, 10.1177/0146167299025005007 · DOI
  27. Tu, 2024, Empowering social media users: Nudge toward self-engaged verification for improved truth and sharing discernment, Journal of Communication, 74, 225, 10.1093/joc/jqae007 · DOI
  28. Vogt, 2022, Genetic and environmental factors of non-ability-based confidence, Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13, 734, 10.1177/19485506211036610 · DOI
  29. Williams-Ceci, 2024, Misinformation does not reduce trust in accurate search results, but warning banners may backfire, Scientific Reports, 14, 10977, 10.1038/s41598-024-61645-8 · DOI
  30. Yang, 2021, “Others are more vulnerable to fake news than I am”: Third-person effect of COVID-19 fake news on social media users, Computers in Human Behavior, 125, 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106950 · DOI
  31. Zhang, D., Vakili Tahami, A., Abualsaud, M., & Smucker, M. D. (2022). Learning trustworthy web sources to derive correct answers and reduce health misinformation in search. In Proceedings of the 45th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (pp. 2099–2104). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 7

Metadata

Authors
Nahar, M., Lee, E.-J., Park, J. W., & Lee, D.
ORCID
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-12
Volume
173
Pages
108763
ISSN
0747-5632
DOI
10.1016/j.chb.2025.108763
Cited by
7
References
16
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion (RS-2021-II211343)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (RS-2022-NR070855)
  • National Science Foundation (2131144, 2114824)
  • Seoul National University
  • Korea Ministry of Science and ICT

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review