Cited by 210Social and Intergroup PsychologyBehavioral Health and InterventionsPsychology of Social Influence

The mere perception of elaboration creates attitude certainty: Exploring the thoughtfulness heuristic.

Barden, Jamie, Petty, Richard E.·2008·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Attitude theory has long proposed a mechanism through which antecedents of message elaboration produce attitude strength consequences. However, little direct evidence exists for the intervening process. The proposed thoughtfulness heuristic holds that perceiving that more thought has taken place leads to greater attitude certainty. Two roles were established for this heuristic: first as a mediator of the impact of antecedents of elaboration on attitude certainty and second as a way to influence attitude certainty independent of actual elaboration. In Studies 1 and 2, antecedents of elaboration (need for cognition, distraction) impacted attitude certainty because they impacted the actual amount of processing, which in turn affected perceptions of the amount of processing. In Studies 3 and 4, a manipulation of perceived thought impacted certainty independent of actual thought (i.e., after thinking had already occurred). Furthermore, the thoughtfulness heuristic was shown to influence behavioral intentions, establishing perceived amount of processing as both a mediator and an independent cause of attitude strength consequences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0012559

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Methods to increase certainty include helping people feel knowledgeable about their new attitude and making them feel that their new attitude is the 'moral' one to have.

    “Methods to increase certainty include helping people feel knowledgeable about their new attitude 156 and making them feel that their new attitude is the 'moral' one to have 157 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barden, J., & Petty, R. E.
Affiliations
  • Howard University (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2008-09
Volume
95
Issue
3
Pages
489-509
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2155109332
Cited by
210
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
25.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords
attitude certainty, attitude strength, message elaboration, need for cognition, distraction, behavioral intention, attitude change
MeSH terms
Attention, Attitude, Conflict, Psychological, Culture, Humans, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Persuasive Communication, Problem Solving, Mental Recall, Thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review