Cited by 68Groundwater and Isotope GeochemistryGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisGeological and Geochemical Analysis

Characterization of lithium cycling in the Salar de Olaroz, Central Andes, using a geochemical and isotopic approach

Open access
Garcia, M.G., Borda, L.G., Godfrey, L.V., López Steinmetz, R.L., Losada-Calderon, A.·2020·Chemical Geology

Abstract

The Salar de Olaroz is one of the main Li operations in Argentina. In order to identify sources and to understand the dynamics of Li in this salt pan, chemical and isotopic analysis (δ7Li and 87Sr/86Sr) of brines, thermal and river waters, as well as ignimbrites and sediments that outcrop in the basin were performed. The Li concentrations in shallow brines (i.e., ∼0.6 m below surface) range from 260 to 890 mg L−1 (average = 841 mg L−1, n = 16), while in deep brines (i.e, 200–450 m b.s.) concentrations are higher (average = 993 mg L−1, n = 16) and range from 690 to 1490 approximately. δ7Li values range from +5.9 to +7.2 ‰ and from +8.1 to +10.2 ‰ in shallow and deep brines respectively, while δ7Li values of the regional rocks and sediments vary between -13.8 and +0.5‰. The 87Sr/86Sr values indicate that the chemical composition of brines in Olaroz is the result of mixing between solutes that are originated from bedrock weathering by shallow meteoric water and water that has a hydrothermal contribution. Due to evaporation, Li concentrations in shallow brines increase by two or three orders of magnitude when compared with the values determined in the main tributaries and in the discharge of thermal waters. This process does not produce measurable isotopic fractionation of Li, thus the isotopic signature of shallow brines and halite crystals in contact with these waters are similar. As brine density increases, water descends through layers of silt and as the brine ages at depth,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.119340

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TDS as low as 6 g L-1 have been found in some salars such as Jama, whereas TDS up to 381 g L-1 were found at Olaroz.

    “TDS as low as 6 g L -1 have been found in some salars such as Jama, whereas TDS up to 381 g L -1 were found at Olaroz, define the maximum measured values (García et al., 2019).”
  • The Paleozoic basement is considered to be the primary source of Li.

    “The Paleozoic basement is also considered to be the primary source of Li (Egenhoff and Lucassen, 2003;Peralta Arnold et al., 2017;García et al., 2019;Meixner et al., 2019).”
  • Other studies have reported Li isotopic data showing that volcanic and Paleozoic basement rocks represent the primary source for Li in the Andean plateau.

    “As already mentioned in section 5.1.,other studies have reported Li isotopic data showing that volcanic and Paleozoic basement rocks represent the primary source for Li in the Andean plateau (Egenhoff and Lucassen, 2003;Peralta Arnold et al., 2017;García et al., 2019;Meixner et al., 2019).”
  • Recent investigations on isotopic systematics show that the primary sources of Li in the Andes, including what is supplied by hydrothermal springs, are restricted varieties of lithologies of the Paleozoic basement that underlies the plateau.

    “However, as discussed in section 5.1, thanks to recent investigations on isotopic systematics, it is now apparent that the primary sources of Li in the Andes, including what is supplied by hydrothermal springs, are restricted varieties of lithologies of the Paleozoic basement that underlies the plateau (Egenhoff and Lucassen, 2003;Peralta Arnold et al., 2017;García et al., 2019;Meixner et al., 201”
  • At Salar de Olaroz, the maximum measured Li is 1,213 mg/L whereas the average Li value resulting from mining operations is 841 mg/L.

    “the case of Salar de Olaroz in Fig. 10 c and in Table 4, where max Li measured is of 1,213 mg L -1 whereas the average Li value that result from mining operations is of 841 mg L -1 ; Garcia et al., 2019”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garcia, M. G., Borda, L. G., Godfrey, L. V., López Steinmetz, R. L., & Losada-Calderon, A.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Chemical Geology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
531
Pages
119340
ISSN
0009-2541 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981458405
Cited by
68
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemical Geology (publishedVersion)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (SECyT-UNC 05/I754)
  • Consejo Interinstitucional de Ciencia y Tecnología
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (PIO N\u00BA 14020140100010CO)
  • Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología - Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
  • Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2015-0313, PICT-V-2014-3654)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Keywords
lithium cycling, lithium brines, lithium isotopes, strontium isotopes, evaporite brines, lithium adsorption, clay minerals, iron oxyhydroxide, hydrothermal fluids, meteoric water, evaporite dissolution, lithium recovery, salt pans, halite, ignimbrites, evaporite diagenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review