The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NAPL-water interfacial area as a function of fluid saturation measured with the interfacial partitioning tracer test method
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
NAPL-water interfacial area increases as water saturation decreases.
“Previous studies have established that the NAPL-water interfacial area increases as water saturation decreases.42–45”
From Contribution of Nonaqueous-Phase Liquids to the Retention and Transport of Per and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Porous Media (2021) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brusseau, M. L. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.065 · Cited by 306
Self-citationMcGuire, M. E., Schaefer, C., Richards, T., Backe, W. J., Field, J. A., Houtz, E., Sedlak, D. L., Guelfo, J. L., Wunsch, A., & Higgins, C. P. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es5006187 · Cited by 269 · cited 1×
“PFAS are emerging contaminants of critical concern, and they can co-occur at sites with NAPL source zones (e.g., Moody et al., 2003; McGuire et al., 2014).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Araujo, 2015, Measuring air-water interfacial area for soils using the mass balance surfactant-tracer method, Chemosphere, 134, 199, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.04.035 · DOI
- Araujo, 2020, Assessing XMT-measurement variability of air-water interfacial areas in natural porous media, Water Resour. Res., 56, 10.1029/2019WR025470 · DOI
- Brusseau, 2019, Estimating the relative magnitudes of adsorption to solid-water and air/oil-water interfaces for per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances, Environ. Pollut., 254, 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113102 · DOI · Paper page
- Brusseau, 2007, Measuring air-water interfacial areas with X-ray microtomography and interfacial partitioning tracer tests, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 1956, 10.1021/es061474m · DOI · Paper page
- Brusseau, 2008, Synchrotron X-ray microtomography and interfacial partitioning tracer test measurements of NAPL-water interfacial areas, Water Resour. Res., 44, W01411, 10.1029/2006WR005517 · DOI · Paper page
- Brusseau, 2009, Measurement and estimation of organic liquid/water interfacial areas for several natural porous media, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 3619, 10.1021/es8020827 · DOI · Paper page
- Brusseau, 2010, Interfacial partitioning tracer test measurements of organic-liquid/water interfacial areas: application to soils and the influence of surface roughness, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 7596, 10.1021/es101312n · DOI · Paper page
- Brusseau, 2019, Comprehensive retention model for PFAS transport in subsurface systems, Water Res., 148, 41, 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.035 · DOI · Paper page
- Cho, 2005, Characterization of pore scale NAPL morphology in homogeneous sands as a function of grain size and NAPL dissolution, Chemosphere, 61, 899, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.04.042 · DOI · Paper page
- Christensen, 2016, Steady state DNAPL dissolution in three-dimensional fractured sandstone network experiments, J. Environ. Eng., 141, 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000871 · DOI
- Dai, D., F.T. Barranco, and T.H. Illangasekare, Partitioning and interfacial tracers for differentiating NAPL entrapment configuration: column-scale investigation. Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 4894-4899. · DOI
- DiCarlo, 2000, Determination of water-oil interfacial area during 3-phase gravity drainage in porous media, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 221, 308, 10.1006/jcis.1999.6604 · DOI · Paper page
- Dobson, 2006, Determination of NAPL-water interfacial areas in well-characterized porous media, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 815, 10.1021/es050037p · DOI · Paper page
- Jain, 2003, Influence of wettability and saturation on liquid-liquid interfacial area in porous media, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 584, 10.1021/es020550s · DOI
- Jiang, 2020, Pore-scale modeling of fluid-fluid interfacial area in variably saturated porous media containing micro-scale surface roughness, Water Resour. Res., 56, 10.1029/2019WR025876 · DOI
- Kim, 1999, Consistency of the interfacial tracer technique: experimental evaluation, J. Contam. Hydrol., 40, 79, 10.1016/S0169-7722(99)00030-3 · DOI
- McDonald, 2016, Comparison of fluid-fluid interfacial areas measured with X-ray microtomography and interfacial partitioning tracer tests for the same samples, Water Resour. Res., 52, 5393, 10.1002/2016WR018775 · DOI
- Moody, 2003, Occurrence and persistence of perfluorooctanesulfonate and other perfluorinated surfactants in groundwater at a fire-training area at Wurtsmith air force base, Michigan, USA, J. Environ. Monit., 5, 341, 10.1039/b212497a · DOI · Paper page
- Narter, 2010, Comparison of interfacial partitioning tracer test and high-resolution microtomography measurements of fluid-fluid interfacial areas for an ideal porous medium, Water Resour. Res., 46, W08602, 10.1029/2009WR008375 · DOI
- Noordman, 2000, Assessment of the use of partitioning and interfacial tracers to determine the content and mass removal rates of nonaqueous phase liquids, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 4301, 10.1021/es990098l · DOI
- Piepenbrink, 2002, vol. 275, 17
- Saripalli, 1997, Measurement of specific fluid–fluid interfacial areas of immiscible fluids in porous media, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 932, 10.1021/es960652g · DOI
- Saripalli, 1997, Estimation of nonaqueous phase liquid-water interfacial areas in porous media following mobilization by chemical flooding, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 3384, 10.1021/es961082n · DOI
- Saripalli, 1998, Determination of specific areas of residual NAPLs in porous media using the interfacial tracers technique, J. Contam. Hydrol., 30, 375, 10.1016/S0169-7722(97)00052-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Schaefer, 2000, Experimental measurement of air-water interfacial area during gravity drainage and secondary imbibition in porous media, Water Resour. Res., 36, 885, 10.1029/2000WR900007 · DOI
- Schaefer, 2009, Dense nonaqueous phase liquid architecture and dissolution in discretely fractured sandstone blocks, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 1877, 10.1021/es8011172 · DOI
- Setarge, 1999, Partitioning and interfacial tracers to characterize non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPLs) in natural aquifer material, Phys. Chem. Earth, 24, 501, 10.1016/S1464-1909(99)00037-4 · DOI
- Zhong, 2016, The two-phase flow IPTT method for measurement of nonwetting-wetting liquid interfacial areas at higher nonwetting saturations in natural porous media, Water Resour. Res., 52, 5506, 10.1002/2016WR018783 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Van Glubt, S., & Brusseau, M. L. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c07355 · Cited by 55
Self-citationLiao, S., Arshadi, M., Woodcock, M. J., Saleeba, Z. S. S. L., Pinchbeck, D., Liu, C., Cápiro, N. L., Abriola, L. M., & Pennell, K. D. (2022) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c00858 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Brusseau, M. L., & Taghap, H.
- Venue
- Chemosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 260
- Pages
- 127562
- ISSN
- 0045-6535
- PMC
- PMC7654436
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review