Cited by 91Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence AnalysisFluorine in Organic Chemistry

Critical new insights into the binding of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to albumin protein

Open access
Alesio, Jessica L., Slitt, Angela, Bothun, Geoffrey D.·2022·Chemosphere

Abstract

With an increasing number of health-related impacts of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) being reported, there is a pressing need to understand PFAS transport within both the human body and the environment. As proteins can serve as a primary transport mechanism for PFAS, understanding PFAS binding to proteins is essential for predictive physiological models where accurate values of protein binding constants are vital. In this work we present a critical analysis of three common models for analyzing PFAS binding to bovine serum albumin (BSA) based on fluorescence quenching: the Stern-Volmer model, the modified Stern-Volmer model, and the Hill equation. The PFAS examined include perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS), perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), and the replacement compound 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)propanoate (HFPO-DA or GenX). While all three models capture the general effects of hydrophobicity and steric limitations to PFAS binding, the Hill equation highlighted a unique relationship between binding cooperativity and the number of fluorinated carbons, with PFOA exhibiting the greatest binding cooperativity. The significance of steric limitations was confirmed by comparing results obtained by fluorescence quenching, which is an indirect method based on specific binding, to those obtained by equilibrium dialysis where PFAS binding directly correlated with traditional measures of hydrophobicity. Finally, the binding constants were correlated with PFAS physicochemical properties where van der Waals volume best described the steric limitations observed by fluorescence quenching.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131979

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cooperative binding models have linked and predicted protein associations using conventional hydrophobicity measures and their influence on biomacromolecule interactions.

    “Cooperative binding models have further correlated (and predicted) protein associations, relying on traditional measures of hydrophobicity and its effect on biomacromolecule interactions (124).”

    From Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment (2022) · cites this paper as [124]

    The Results and Discussion sections report that the Hill model accounts for cooperativity in PFAS–albumin binding and that binding constants correlate with log Kow, a measure of hydrophobicity (pages not specified in our copy). They do not show that a cooperative model predicted protein associations from hydrophobicity alone; the paper also identifies steric effects as important. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. MacManus-Spencer LA, Tse ML, Hebert PC, Bischel HN, Luthy RG, 2010. Binding of perfluorocarboxylates to serum albumin: A comparison of analytical methods. Anal. Chem 82, 974– 981. 20039637

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alesio, J. L., Slitt, A., & Bothun, G. D.
Affiliations
University of Rhode Island (US)
Corresponding author
Bothun, Geoffrey D.
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
287
Issue
Pt 1
Pages
131979
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3195727434
Cited by
91
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemosphere (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Journal of Media Literacy Education (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P42ES027706)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS, bovine serum albumin, protein binding, binding constant, fluorescence quenching, Stern-Volmer model, Hill equation, cooperative binding, hydrophobicity, van der Waals volume, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, GenX, perfluorinated carboxylic acids, perfluorinated sulfonic acids, equilibrium dialysis, PFAS transport
MeSH terms
Albumins, Environmental Pollutants, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Propionates, Alkanesulfonic Acids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review