Cited by 96Microbial Fuel Cells and BioremediationAlgal biology and biofuel productionBiofuel production and bioconversion

Economic assessment of an integrated bioethanol–biodiesel–microbial fuel cell facility utilizing yeast and photosynthetic algae

Powell, E.E., Hill, G.A.·2009·Chemical Engineering Research and Design

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cherd.2009.06.018

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Powell, E. E., & Hill, G. A.
Affiliations
University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Corresponding author
Powell, E.E.
Venue
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
87
Issue
9
Pages
1340-1348
ISSN
0263-8762 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988422513
Cited by
96
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Process Safety and Environmental Protection (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
Keywords
microbial fuel cells, photosynthetic microalgae, Chlorella vulgaris, column photobioreactor, biodiesel production, yeast fermentation, CO2 sequestration, economic feasibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review