Cited by 222Child Abuse and TraumaChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Welfare and Adoption

Managing emotion in a maltreating context: A pilot study examining child neglect

Shipman, Kimberly, Edwards, Anna, Brown, Amy, Swisher, Lisa, Jennings, Ernestine·2005·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Objective The primary goal of this pilot study was to examine emotion management skills (i.e., emotional understanding, emotion regulation) in children who had experienced neglect and a control group to determine the ways that neglect may interfere with children's emotional development. Method Participants included children 6--12 years of age and their mothers (neglect group, N=24; control, N=24). Participants completed questionnaires and an interview that assessed children's emotional understanding and emotion regulation. Results Findings indicated that neglected children, compared to their non-maltreated peers, demonstrated lower understanding of negative emotions (i.e., anger, sadness) and fewer adaptive emotion regulation skills. Further, neglected children expected less support and more conflict from mothers in response to displays of negative emotion and reported that they were more likely to attempt to inhibit the expression of negative emotion. Conclusions Findings suggest that neglect may interfere with the normal acquisition of emotional understanding and emotion regulation skills, highlighting the importance of addressing these skills in the context of clinical intervention with neglected children.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.01.006

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shipman, K., Edwards, A., Brown, A., Swisher, L., & Jennings, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Denver (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
  • Oklahoma State University (US)
Corresponding author
Shipman, Kimberly
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
29
Issue
9
Pages
1015-1029
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052320046
Cited by
222
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R03MH060281, 1R03 MH60281-01A1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
child neglect, emotion regulation, emotional understanding, emotional development, maltreated children, maternal support, maternal conflict, negative emotion expression, children's emotional development
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Child Development, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Mother-Child Relations, Pilot Projects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review