Cited by 698Child Abuse and TraumaChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Welfare and Adoption

Childhood maltreatment, emotional dysregulation, and psychiatric comorbidities

Open access
Dvir, Yael, Ford, Julian D., Hill, Michael, Frazier, Jean A.·2014·Harvard Review of Psychiatry

Abstract

Affect dysregulation, defined as the impaired ability to regulate or tolerate negative emotional states, has been associated with interpersonal trauma and posttraumatic stress. Affect-regulation difficulties play a role in many psychiatric conditions, including anxiety and mood disorders, and especially major depression in youth and bipolar disorder throughout the life span. Exposure to traumatic events and interpersonal trauma in childhood is associated with wide-ranging psychosocial, developmental, and medical impairments in children, adolescents, and adults, with emotional dysregulation being a core feature that may help to account for this heightened risk. In order to understand how the developmental effects of childhood maltreatment contribute to emotional dysregulation and psychiatric sequelae, we review emotional regulation and its developmental neurobiology, and examine the research evidence of associations between childhood trauma, emotional dysregulation, and psychiatric comorbidities in children, adolescents, and adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hrp.0000000000000014

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dvir, Y., Ford, J. D., Hill, M., & Frazier, J. A.
Affiliations
Ford Motor Company (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Dvir, Yael
Venue
Harvard Review of Psychiatry
Published
2014-05
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
149-161
ISSN
1067-3229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967100996
Cited by
698
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Harvard Review of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD004147)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
child abuse, emotional dysregulation, emotion regulation, psychiatric comorbidity, interpersonal trauma, post-traumatic stress, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorders, mood disorders, developmental neuroscience, trauma exposure
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Child Development, Emotions, Humans, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Comorbidity, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review