Cited by 39Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsChild Abuse and TraumaPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Emotion Regulation Processes and Psychoform and Somatoform Dissociation in Adolescents and Young Adults with Cumulative Maltreatment

Open access
Henschel, Sébastien, Doba, Karyn, Nandrino, Jean-Louis·2019·Journal of Trauma & Dissociation

Abstract

The relationship between childhood trauma and dissociative experiences is widely acknowledged. However, the association between emotion regulation difficulties (ERD), anxiety/depression and dissociation in adolescents and young adults with cumulative maltreatment (CM) remains unclear. The present study examined the role of ERD at both intrapersonal and interpersonal levels and anxiety/depression symptoms in the development of psychoform or somatoform dissociation in adolescents and young adults with CM. We assessed 58 participants with CM and 55 participants without childhood trauma history between the age of 12 and 22 years old. Participants completed self-reports of ERD, anxiety/depression, psychoform dissociation and somatoform dissociation. The results revealed that adolescents and young adults exposed to CM displayed high levels of psychoform and somatoform dissociation, ERD and anxiety/depression symptoms. It was also found that intrapersonal and interpersonal ERD predicted psychoform dissociation, whereas anxiety/depression predicted somatoform dissociation in adolescents and young adults with CM. Intrapersonal and interpersonal ERD and anxiety/depression are therapy targets for clinical interventions in adolescents and young adults with CM and dissociative symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15299732.2018.1502714

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henschel, S., Doba, K., & Nandrino, J.-L.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Doba, Karyn
Venue
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
Published
2018-08-03
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
197-211
ISSN
  • 1529-9732 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-9740
OpenAlex
W2887382911
Cited by
39
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Trauma & Dissociation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • LillOA (Université de Lille (University Of Lille)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • LillOA (Université de Lille (University Of Lille)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
emotional dysregulation, somatoform dissociation, childhood trauma, adolescents, young adults, anxiety, depression, interpersonal emotion regulation, intrapersonal emotion regulation, dissociative symptoms
MeSH terms
Emotional Regulation, Adolescent, Anxiety, Child, Child Abuse, Depression, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Somatoform Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review