CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 313Child Abuse and TraumaPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A validation study of the Dutch Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form: Factor structure, reliability, and known-groups validity

Open access
Thombs, Brett D., Bernstein, David P., Lobbestael, Jill, Arntz, Arnoud·2009·Child Abuse & Neglect
DOI 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.03.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.03.001

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Aslan, 1999, The reliability, validity and factor structure of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire among a group of university students, Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 10, 275
  2. Basurte, 2004, Actas Espanolas De Psiquiatria, 32, 149
  3. Woller, 2007, Influence of personality variables on perceived help and stress by group therapy and fellow patients in multimodal psychodynamic inpatient psychotherapy, Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie, 53, 163

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 313

Related

Metadata

Authors
Thombs, B. D., Bernstein, D. P., Lobbestael, J., & Arntz, A.
Affiliations
  • Jewish General Hospital (CA)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Thombs, Brett D.
ORCID
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
33
Issue
8
Pages
518-523
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.03.001
OpenAlex
W2078870036
Cited by
313
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship@McGill (McGill) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form, childhood trauma, Dutch translation, factor structure, internal consistency, known-groups validity, child physical abuse, childhood emotional abuse, child sexual abuse, childhood physical neglect, childhood emotional neglect, item validity, psychiatric patients
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child Abuse, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review