Cited by 85Child Abuse and TraumaChild Welfare and AdoptionMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

Childhood experiences of sexual abuse and later parenting practices among non-offending mothers of sexually abused and comparison girls

Kim, Kihyun, Trickett, Penelope K., Putnam, Frank W.·2010·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Objective The primary goal of this study was to explore the relationship between childhood sexual abuse and parenting practices among non-offending mothers of sexually abused girls. Guided by a developmental-ecological perspective of parenting, several models with different potential pathways starting from the mothers' childhood experiences of sexual abuse and culminating in their parenting practices (e.g., direct, spurious, indirect effect) were hypothesized and explored in the context of the mothers' past and current psychosocial risks and resources. Two dimensions of parenting were considered: providing positive structure (i.e., ratings of how consistent, fair, easygoing), and using punitive discipline. Methods This study utilized a sample from a longitudinal, multigenerational study in which sexually abused girls, demographically similar comparison girls, and the mothers of both groups of girls participated. For the current study, the data regarding the mothers of the two groups of girls was of primary importance. Results The results from a series of model comparison tests supported the spurious effect of mothers' childhood sexual abuse on the positive structure dimension. A direct, inverse relationship was found as the most accurate model with the punitive discipline dimension. Overall, childhood experience of punitive discipline, current dissociative symptoms, and satisfaction with social support were indicated as possible correlates of parenting practices among the mot…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.01.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 73 · Cited by 85

Authors
Kim, K., Trickett, P. K., & Putnam, F. W.
Affiliations
  • Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Kihyun
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
610-622
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975294043
Cited by
85
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH048330)
  • National Cancer Institute (90CA1549)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
child sexual abuse, parenting practices, punitive discipline, positive parenting, dissociative symptoms, social support, intrafamilial child sexual abuse, family intervention programs
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Child, Preschool, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Mothers, Social Support, Parenting, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review