Cited by 32Child Welfare and AdoptionChild Abuse and TraumaChild Abuse and Related Trauma

Child maltreatment in the time of COVID-19: changes in the Florida foster care system surrounding the COVID-19 safer-at-home order

Open access
Musser, Erica D., Riopelle, Cameron, Latham, Robert·2021·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Background Media outlets have suggested that rates of child maltreatment may increase during the global COVID-19 pandemic. The few empirical studies that have examined pandemic related changes in rates of child maltreatment have relied predominantly on reports of suspected maltreatment.Objective This study examines rates of documented, substantiated child maltreatment resulting in foster care placement, as well as demographic correlates of child maltreatment within the foster care system, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Participants and setting Data were available for all youth in the FL foster care system from January 1, 2001 through June 30, 2020 (i.e., > 304,000 youth; > 1.1 million total placements).Methods This study utilizes data from the Florida State Automated Child Welfare Information System (SACWIS).Results Results revealed a decrease in the number of youths placed in the FL foster care system during the COVID-19 pandemic with the greatest reduction in April, 2020 during the Safer-at-Home Order (24 % fewer youth in 2020 than 2019). In contrast, the percentage of placements into foster care due to maltreatment increased by 3.34 %. Demographic-linked differences were observed in placement rates and exposure to maltreatment.Conclusions While prior work suggests that reports of child maltreatment have decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, this study demonstrates that overall rates of substantiated maltreatment resulting in foster care placement have increased for White youth, while rates of placement of due to inadequate supervision, emotional neglect, and/or parental substance use have decreased for Black youth. Implications for policy and future research are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.104945

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children who lose caregivers to the pandemic may face intensified trauma and may have an immediate need for kinship or foster care at a time when pandemic restrictions may limit access to protective services.

    “Children who lose caregivers to the pandemic may face intensified trauma and may have an immediate need for kinship or foster care at a time when pandemic restrictions may limit access to protective services.12–15”

    From COVID-19–Associated Orphanhood and Caregiver Death in the United States (2021) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Discussion reports fewer Florida foster-care placements during the Safer-At-Home order and threats to child-welfare resources, including foster-parent reluctance and reduced accessibility of therapeutic services. It does not address children who lost caregivers to the pandemic, their trauma, or an immediate need for kinship or foster care. No page number is provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Musser, E. D., Riopelle, C., & Latham, R.
Affiliations
  • Florida International University (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Musser, Erica D.
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
116
Issue
Pt 2
Pages
104945
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121722511
Cited by
32
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7
FWCI
7.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florida International University Digital Commons (Florida International University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH117280-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child Abuse and Related Trauma
Keywords
child abuse, COVID-19 pandemic, foster care placement, substantiated maltreatment, racial disparities, Black youth, white youth, inadequate supervision, emotional neglect, parental substance use
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adolescent, Child, Child Abuse, Child Welfare, Child, Preschool, Female, Florida, Foster Home Care, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Parents, White People, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review